Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Kalindi Damodar Garde v. Manohar Laxman Kulkarni

07 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, sons born before their father's adoption are entitled to inherit his property as class I heirs, overruling prior Hindu law interpretations.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 adoption inheritance rights natural born sons

Prem Chand Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

07 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari · 2020 INSC 155

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent prosecution based on the same facts after acquittal is barred under Section 300 CrPC and quashed the later FIR and related orders.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Section 300 CrPC discharge application general power of attorney

Prem Chand Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

07 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that a subsequent prosecution based on the same facts after acquittal violates Section 300 CrPC and quashed the later FIR and related orders.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Section 300 CrPC discharge application general power of attorney

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

07 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that unutilised MODVAT credit and sales tax recoverable amounts do not qualify as deductions under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act as they do not constitute sums payable and actually paid by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43B Income Tax Act MODVAT credit Excise Duty unutilised credit

Union of India v. Deepak Niranjan Nath Pandit

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that courts should not interfere with lawful government transfer orders on grounds of personal hardship absent mala fide or illegality, and set aside the High Court's interim stay on the transfer.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant transfer order Article 226 extraordinary jurisdiction administrative discretion

C.S. Venkatesh v. A.S.C. Murthy

07 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract and that the sale deed was an outright sale, thereby dismissing the suit for specific performance and restoring the trial court's judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement of reconveyance readiness and willingness nominal sale deed

M/s Rajankumar and Brothers (Impex) v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

07 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; K. M. Joseph

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with the Institute Classification Clause in a marine insurance policy constitutes a breach of warranty discharging insurer liability, and issuance of a General Average Guarantee without knowledge of breach does not waive this breach.

insurance appeal_dismissed Significant Marine Insurance Institute Classification Clause IACS Breach of Warranty

Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

07 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that unutilised MODVAT credit and sales tax recoverable amounts do not qualify as allowable deductions under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act as they do not constitute actual payments of tax or duty by the assessee.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 43B Income Tax Act MODVAT credit Excise Duty actual payment

Vundavalli Ratna Manikyam v. V.P.P.R.N. Prasada Rao

06 Feb 2020 · M. R. Shah; Arun Mishra; Vineet Saran · 2020 INSC 141

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance applying Article 113 of the Limitation Act, dismissing the limitation defense under Article 54, and directed payment of enhanced consideration to settle a long-pending land sale dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell limitation Article 54 Limitation Act

Vundavalli Ratna Manikyam v. V.P.P.R.N. Prasada Rao

06 Feb 2020 · M. R. Shah; Arun Mishra; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell, applying Article 113 of the Limitation Act, and directed payment of enhanced consideration to conclude the sale.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell limitation Article 54 Limitation Act

CANARA BANK v. M/S UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.

06 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court held that farmers storing produce in an insured cold store are consumers and beneficiaries under the insurance policy, entitling them to compensation for accidental fire loss despite lack of direct contract with the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance policy interpretation consumer protection act beneficiary privity of contract

Chhota Ahirwar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

06 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat · 2020 INSC 138

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant for lack of proof of common intention under Section 307/34 IPC, holding that mere exhortation without pre-arranged common intention is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention instigation

Chhota Ahirwar v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

06 Feb 2020 · Indira Banerjee; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant for lack of proof of common intention under Section 34 IPC in an attempt to murder case, emphasizing that mere instigation without pre-arranged common intention is insufficient for conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention instigation

M/S. NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) v. STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.

05 Feb 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 137

The Supreme Court held that a lease granted after inclusion of land in a wildlife sanctuary is ineffective, no damages lie without proof of deprivation, and limitation principles bar the appellant's claim, dismissing the review petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 lease rights wildlife sanctuary damages claim

M/S. NATESAN AGENCIES (PLANTATIONS) v. STATE REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVT.

05 Feb 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court dismissed the review petition upholding that no rights could be acquired post-wildlife sanctuary notification, the second lease was ineffective, and the appellant was not entitled to damages or limitation benefits.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 lease rights wildlife sanctuary damages claim

Mohammade Yusuf v. Rajkumar

05 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide compromise decree relating to the subject matter of the suit does not require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, overruling the High Court's contrary decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree registration Section 17 Registration Act adverse possession

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Shyam Kishore Singh

05 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 136
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated requests for correction of date of birth in service records after decades of acceptance and post-retirement are not sustainable, setting aside the High Court's orders granting such relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction service records delay in claim fag end of service

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Shyam Kishore Singh

05 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that belated correction of date of birth in service records after decades of acceptance is not permissible, setting aside the High Court's order granting such relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant date of birth correction service records fag end of service delay in claim

Kajal v. Jagdish Chand & Ors.

05 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation to a minor with 100% permanent disability from a motor accident, applying the multiplier method and directing interest from claim filing date and secure investment of the award.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 just compensation multiplier method personal injury damages

Kajal v. Jagdish Chand & Ors.

05 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for a minor with 100% physical and mental disability from a motor accident, applying the multiplier method and directing proper investment and interest on the award under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 just compensation multiplier method attendant charges