Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Kantaru Rajeevaru v. Indian Young Lawyers Association

10 Feb 2020 · S. A. Bobde; R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; L. Nageswara Rao;...

The Supreme Court held that it can refer questions of constitutional law to a larger bench in pending review petitions arising from writ petitions under Article 32, affirming the maintainability of such reviews and clarifying the scope of judicial review over religious practices.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Article 25 Constitution Article 26 Constitution Freedom of religion Judicial review

Prathvi Raj Chauhan v. Union of India

10 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST Act excluding anticipatory bail, recalled procedural safeguards imposed earlier, and affirmed courts' power to prevent misuse without diluting protective discrimination.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 Section 18A anticipatory bail

PRATHVI RAJ CHAUHAN v. UNION OF INDIA

10 Feb 2020 · ARUN MISHRA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 18 and 18A of the SC/ST Act barring anticipatory bail, recalled judicial directions requiring approval for arrest and preliminary enquiry, and emphasized protective discrimination and judicial safeguards against misuse.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 18 Section 18A anticipatory bail

Atma Ram v. Charanjit Singh

10 Feb 2020 · N. V. Ramana; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance originally filed as a mandatory injunction suit with insufficient court fee, emphasizing the necessity of proper procedural compliance and continuous readiness and willingness under the Specific Relief Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance mandatory injunction court fee Section 149 CPC

Mukul Agrawal and Others v. State of U.P. and Another

10 Feb 2020 · Navin Sinha; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings for forgery after the civil appellate court conclusively held the disputed agreement was genuine, emphasizing that continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Forgery Quashing of criminal proceedings Abuse of process of law

Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another

10 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 160
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging forgery pending civil adjudication but restored the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 N.I. Act, emphasizing statutory presumption and trial necessity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Forgery Cheque dishonour Handwriting expert opinion

Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel and Others v. State of Gujarat and Another

10 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR alleging forgery pending civil adjudication but restored the cheque dishonour case under Section 138 N.I. Act, emphasizing the statutory presumption and need for trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Forgery Quashing of FIR Handwriting expert opinion

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi · 2020 INSC 147
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court referred for reconsideration the legal principles on regularisation of temporary workmen under ONGC's Certified Standing Orders and unfair labour practices, emphasizing the applicability of Umadevi and statutory limits on regularisation.

labor other Significant regularisation unfair labour practice Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Certified Standing Orders

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation v. Krishan Gopal

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the PCLU decision on automatic regularisation of temporary ONGC workmen after 240 days' service requires reconsideration in light of constitutional principles and prior precedents, and referred the batch of appeals to a larger Bench.

labor other Significant regularisation temporary workmen Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 unfair labour practice

Nitesh Kumar Pandey v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's ruling invalidating the introduction of a computer efficiency test mid-way in the Gram Rojgar Sahayak recruitment process, holding such alteration unauthorized and candidates not estopped from challenging it.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Gram Rojgar Sahayak MGNREGS selection process computer efficiency test

Nitesh Kumar Pandey v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision invalidating the introduction of a computer efficiency test mid-way in the recruitment process for Gram Rojgar Sahayak, holding that such alteration of selection criteria without authority is impermissible.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Gram Rojgar Sahayak MGNREGS selection process computer efficiency test

Mukesh Kumar & Anr. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA · 2020 INSC 153

The Supreme Court held that the State is not constitutionally bound to provide reservation in promotions and may decide not to do so without collecting quantifiable data, setting aside the High Court's directions to the contrary.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation in promotion Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Article 16(4)

Mukesh Kumar & Anr. v. The State of Uttarakhand & Ors.

07 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that the State Government is not constitutionally bound to provide reservation in promotions and may decide not to do so without collecting quantifiable data on adequacy of representation of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant reservation in promotion Scheduled Castes Scheduled Tribes Article 16(4)

INFINITY INFOTECH PARKS LIMITED v. SHIVA JUTE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED

07 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 152

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside the High Court order and directed the sub-lessee to pay interim lease rent, maintenance, and electricity charges as a condition for restoration of electricity supply.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease rent maintenance charges electricity charges interim relief

INFINITY INFOTECH PARKS LIMITED v. SHIVA JUTE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED

07 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal setting aside the High Court's order restoring electricity without payment, directing the sub-lessee to pay outstanding lease rent, maintenance, and electricity charges as a condition for restoration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease rent maintenance charges electricity charges interim relief

Parmeshwar Nanda v. State of Jharkhand

07 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta · 2020 INSC 149
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service under a temporary government scheme does not qualify as pensionable service unless specifically declared, and employees absorbed as fresh appointees cannot count prior service for pension or seniority.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pensionary benefits Adult Education Project temporary government service Rule 59 Bihar Pension Rules

Parmeshwar Nanda v. State of Jharkhand

07 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that service under a temporary government scheme does not qualify as pensionable government service absent explicit State declaration, dismissing appeals seeking pension benefits for such service.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant pensionable service Adult Education Project Rule 58 Jharkhand Pension Rules Rule 59 Bihar Pension Rules

Bharti AXA General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Priya Paul

07 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the insurance claim for a fatal glider accident, ruling that the glider was a duly licensed standard aircraft, the deceased was a fare-paying passenger, and the operator was an air charter company, thus falling within the Policy coverage.

insurance appeal_dismissed Significant glider aircraft standard type of aircraft insurance policy exclusion

State Bank of India and Anr v. New India Assurance Company Limited

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that the bank cannot be held liable to pay an insurance claim when the borrower accepted the consumer forum's order and settled with the bank, placing liability solely on the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim consumer dispute State Bank of India National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

State Bank of India and Anr v. New India Assurance Company Limited

07 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indu Malhotra

The Supreme Court held that the bank cannot be held liable for an insurance claim when the borrower accepted a consumer forum order directing the bank only to forward the claim and had settled all claims with the bank, affirming that insurance liability lies with the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance claim bank liability consumer forum SCDRC