Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Union of India & Ors. v. M/s. Associated Container Terminal Ltd.

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that customs duty on unclaimed warehoused goods sold by auction must be calculated on sale proceeds as per Section 150(2) of the Customs Act, overruling the High Court's order and clarifying the priority of payments from sale proceeds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 warehouse charges customs duty calculation sale proceeds distribution

Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. State of Bihar

14 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2020 INSC 192

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused of rape and house trespass charges due to unreliable prosecutrix testimony unsupported by medical or forensic evidence and material contradictions creating reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony medical evidence forensic evidence

Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. State of Bihar

14 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court acquitted the accused in a rape case due to material contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical or forensic evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable and trustworthy evidence to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony medical evidence FSL report

Laxmibai v. The Collector, Nanded

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 197
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that disqualification for failure to submit election expenses under Maharashtra local body laws must be proportionate and supported by reasons, and election disputes must be raised by election petition, not writ petition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election expenses disqualification Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961

Laxmibai v. The Collector, Nanded

14 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Hemant Gupta; Dinesh Maheshwari
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that disqualification for failure to submit election expenses must be proportionate and supported by reasons, and election disputes should ordinarily be resolved through election petitions under Article 243-O, not writ petitions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant election expenses disqualification Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961

CHARITIES & ORS v. M/S BHASKAR RAJU & BROTHERS

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause in an insufficiently stamped lease deed cannot be enforced unless deficit stamp duty and penalty are paid, and set aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator on such a document.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement insufficiently stamped document Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

Charities & Ors. v. M/s Bhaskar Raju & Brothers

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that an insufficiently stamped lease deed cannot be relied upon to enforce an arbitration clause, setting aside the High Court's appointment of an arbitrator under such a document.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause insufficient stamp duty Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Section 11(6) Arbitration Act

Vinay Sharma v. Union of India and Others

14 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the mercy petition by the President of India, holding that the rejection was based on proper application of mind and all relevant materials were considered, thereby upholding the death sentence of the petitioner.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution death sentence judicial review

Vinay Sharma v. Union of India and Others

14 Feb 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of the petitioner's mercy plea, holding that the President duly considered all relevant materials and the limited scope of judicial review does not permit interference.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition Article 72 Constitution of India death sentence judicial review

M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA & ORS.

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that stamp duty objections on power of attorney documents involving transfer of possession must be decided after evidence on possession is led, setting aside lower courts' orders and remitting the matter for fresh adjudication.

civil appeal_allowed Significant power of attorney Indian Stamp Act, 1899 stamp duty conveyance

M/S. Z. ENGINEERS CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. & ANR. v. BIPIN BIHARI BEHERA & ORS.

14 Feb 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that power of attorney documents involving transfer of possession must be treated as conveyances attracting stamp duty, and objections to insufficient stamping can be decided after evidence, setting aside lower courts' orders dismissing impounding applications.

civil appeal_allowed Significant power of attorney stamp duty Indian Stamp Act, 1899 conveyance

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable despite disputed facts when the State arbitrarily denies refund of an auction amount where possession was never given, directing refund with interest.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition disputed questions of fact refund of auction amount

Popatrao Vyankatrao Patil v. State of Maharashtra

14 Feb 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against the State for refund of auction amount when possession was not given and no excavation occurred, directing refund with interest and emphasizing the State's duty as a model litigant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 writ petition contractual obligation refund

Vinod Giri Goswami v. State of Uttarakhand

14 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that promotee Deputy Collectors appointed ad hoc contrary to rules cannot count such service for seniority and upheld the State's seniority list reflecting final allotments under the Reorganization Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant seniority dispute ad hoc appointment promotee quota direct recruit

Rambabu Singh Thakur v. Sunil Arora

13 Feb 2020 · R.F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court mandated stringent transparency and disclosure requirements for political parties regarding candidates with pending criminal cases, emphasizing compliance under threat of contempt.

constitutional other Significant criminalisation of politics disclosure of criminal antecedents political parties Supreme Court directions

Rambabu Singh Thakur v. Sunil Arora

13 Feb 2020 · R.F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court mandated political parties to transparently disclose candidates' criminal cases and reasons for their selection, enforcing compliance through contempt proceedings to combat criminalisation of politics.

constitutional other Significant criminalisation of politics disclosure of criminal antecedents political parties Supreme Court directions

ONGC Employees Mazdoor Sabha v. Executive Director Basin Manager

13 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that term-based employees irregularly appointed without public advertisement are entitled to regularization from the date of industrial dispute referral with actual benefits from that date, but not retrospectively from initial appointment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization term-based employment industrial dispute public advertisement

K Sivaraman & Ors. v. P Sathishkumar & Anr.

13 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation under the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 must be calculated based on the wage ceiling applicable on the date of the accident, and amendments deleting the wage ceiling do not apply retrospectively to accidents before their commencement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 wage ceiling retrospective application compensation calculation

OSIANS CONNOISSEURS OF ART PVT. LTD v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

12 Feb 2020 · R. F. Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court held that trusts operating unregistered collective investment schemes violate SEBI regulations and directed refund of investors' monies with interest, dismissing the appeals.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Collective Investment Scheme SEBI Act 1992 Section 11AA Section 12(1B)

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. National Bulk Handling Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

12 Feb 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the insurer's liability under a Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy where credible evidence showed employee involvement in loss by substitution of goods, and the claim was timely lodged.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Fidelity Guarantee Insurance Policy breach of fidelity insurance claim employee dishonesty