Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Additional Commissioner Revenue and Others v. Akhalaq Hussain and Another

03 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an exchange of agricultural land by a Scheduled Tribe member to a non-tribal without prior permission under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act is void, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

property appeal_allowed Significant U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 Section 157-B Section 161 Scheduled Tribe land transfer

Additional Commissioner Revenue and Others v. Akhalaq Hussain and Another

03 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that an exchange of land involving a Scheduled Tribe member without prior permission under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 is void, and such land vests in the State, overruling the High Court's contrary view.

property appeal_allowed Significant U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 Section 157-B Section 161 Scheduled Tribe land transfer

Mangayakarasi v. M. Yuvaraj

03 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; S. Abdul Nazeer; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that a High Court in a second appeal cannot reappreciate evidence and that acquittal in criminal proceedings does not automatically amount to mental cruelty warranting divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act Section 13 Section 9 mental cruelty

Aviation Travels Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhavesha Suresh Goradia and Others

02 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to set aside the ex parte decree against the appellant, restored the suit, and granted opportunity to contest subject to deposit of security, holding that valid appearance through Power of Attorney waives personal service of summons.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Power of Attorney vakalatnama service of summons

AVIATION TRAVELS PVT. LTD. v. BHAVESHA SURESH GORADIA AND OTHERS

02 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to set aside an ex parte decree and restored the suit, holding that valid representation by an advocate through Power of Attorney waives personal service of summons, and granted the appellant opportunity to contest the suit subject to deposit of a substantial amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex parte decree Power of Attorney vakalatnama service of summons

Union Bank of India v. Rajat Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

02 Mar 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court held that the mandatory pre-deposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act cannot be waived by the High Court and set aside the order permitting appeal without such deposit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 18 pre-deposit Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal

Shri Satish Kumar v. The State of Himachal Pradesh

02 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indu Malhotra; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's acquittal of accused in a murder case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that disclosure statements were inadmissible due to prior police knowledge of the dead body's location.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence disclosure statement Section 27 Indian Evidence Act recovery of dead body

Shah Faesal v. Union of India

02 Mar 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy; B. R. Ga... · 2020 INSC 253
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held there is no conflict between its precedents on Article 370 and refused to refer the constitutional challenge to a larger Bench, upholding the doctrine of precedent and rejecting the plea of per incuriam.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 370 Constitution Orders 2019 Doctrine of precedent Per incuriam

D.B. Basnett v. The Collector East District, Gangtok, Sikkim & Anr.

02 Mar 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State's failure to follow statutory acquisition procedure and pay compensation invalidated its claim to land, entitling the original owner to possession and damages.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Sikkim Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1977 Article 300A right to property

D.B. Basnett v. The Collector East District, Gangtok, Sikkim & Anr.

02 Mar 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; K.M. Joseph
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition without following statutory procedure and payment of compensation under the Sikkim Land Act is invalid, entitling the owner to possession and damages.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition Sikkim Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1977 Article 300A right to property

Parvat Singh & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh

02 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah · 2020 INSC 244

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted solely on the testimony of a sole eyewitness whose evidence was found unreliable due to material contradictions and omissions, emphasizing that conviction requires trustworthy and consistent evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole eyewitness material contradictions Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC

Parvat Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

02 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted solely on the testimony of a sole eyewitness due to material contradictions and lack of corroboration, emphasizing that conviction under Section 149 IPC requires proof of common object.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sole eyewitness Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC Section 161 Cr.P.C.

The Periyar District Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd. v. B. Balagopal & Ors.

02 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court modified the damages awarded for unlawful occupation by a tenant cooperative society, balancing fair rent principles and equitable considerations, and allowed the appeal in part.

civil appeal_allowed Significant damages eviction lease agreement rent control

The Periyar District Consumer Cooperative Wholesale Stores Ltd. v. B. Balagopal & Ors.

02 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court modified the damages awarded for unlawful possession under a lease, balancing fair rent principles and the tenant's cooperative status, allowing the appeal in part and directing payment of a reduced amount.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease agreement damages for use and occupation eviction Tamil Nadu Lease and Rent Control Act

Sajan Sethi v. Rajan Sethi

02 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's judgment on partition and rights over common areas, holding that courts can adjudicate such rights when raised by parties, even if outside the original scope of the suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition suit common areas easementary rights Will interpretation

Sajan Sethi v. Rajan Sethi

02 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, affirming the High Court's decision on partition and rights over common areas in a property dispute governed by a Will.

civil appeal_dismissed partition suit common areas Will easementary rights

Samta Naidu & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

02 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a second criminal complaint on the same facts is not maintainable after dismissal of the first complaint on merits unless exceptional circumstances exist, and dismissed the second complaint as an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant second complaint Section 203 CrPC Pramatha Nath Talukdar dismissal on merits

Samta Naidu & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh and Anr.

02 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a second criminal complaint on the same facts dismissed on merits under Section 203 CrPC is not maintainable unless exceptional circumstances exist, and dismissed the second complaint as an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant second complaint Section 203 CrPC maintainability of complaint Pramatha Nath Taluqdar

Shah Faesal v. Union of India

02 Mar 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Sanjay Kishan Kaul; R. Subhash Reddy; B. R. Ga...
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held there is no conflict between Prem Nath Kaul and Sampat Prakash judgments on Article 370 and refused to refer the matter to a larger Bench.

constitutional other Significant Article 370 Constitution Orders 2019 larger Bench reference doctrine of precedent

Than Kunwar v. State of Haryana

02 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; K.M. Joseph

The Supreme Court upheld conviction under the NDPS Act, ruling that non-production of entire contraband and minor discrepancies in witness testimony do not vitiate prosecution if seizure and sample testing are proved and Section 50 applies only to personal searches.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 18 NDPS Section 50 NDPS contraband production