Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Sardar Ali Khan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh

12 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings alleging forgery and cheating over a disputed sale deed pending civil adjudication, holding such criminal prosecution an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings abuse of process of law civil dispute

Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF) v. Union of India

06 Mar 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of provisions regulating foreign contributions to organisations of a political nature, holding that the powers conferred are not vague or arbitrary and that fundamental rights under Article 19 are not available to non-citizen organisations.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 Section 5(1) Rule 3(i), 3(v), 3(vi) Article 14

Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF) v. Union of India

06 Mar 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Sections 5(1) and 5(4) of the FCRA 2010 and related Rules, holding that the power to declare organisations of political nature is not vague and that only organisations involved in active politics can be barred from receiving foreign contributions.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 Section 5(1) Rule 3(i), 3(v), 3(vi) Article 14

M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India

06 Mar 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a secured creditor's prior charge on property prevails over subsequent Income Tax attachment, validating the appellant's purchase and transfer of the property despite the Income Tax Department's attachment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Schedule II Rule 2 Rule 16

M/s. Connectwell Industries Pvt. Ltd v. Union of India

06 Mar 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a prior secured charge and sale under the DRT take precedence over subsequent Income Tax Act attachments, allowing the appellant's appeal for property transfer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Schedule II Rule 2 Rule 16

Poonam Devi and Others v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd

06 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a truck driver’s death while fetching water and bathing during a journey arose out of and in the course of employment under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, restoring compensation to his legal heirs.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 Employer’s liability Notional extension Course of employment

Poonam Devi and Others v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd

06 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a truck driver’s death while fetching water and bathing during a journey arose out of and in the course of employment under the doctrine of notional extension, entitling legal heirs to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 employer’s liability notional extension course of employment

M. Vanaja v. M. Sarla Devi

06 Mar 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA

The Supreme Court held that failure to prove adoption in accordance with the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, including consent and ceremony, precludes recognition as an adopted child and entitlement to partition of adoptive parents' property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 valid adoption consent of wife adoption ceremony

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/s Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd.

06 Mar 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court upheld that a 100% EOU undertaking job-work with DTA units under the EXIM Policy is entitled to excise duty exemption under Notification No.8/97, rejecting Revenue's claim for duty and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Export Oriented Unit EXIM Policy Central Excise Act Job-work

M/S NANDAN BIOMATRIX LTD. v. S. AMBIKA DEVI

06 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a small farmer engaged in cultivation under a buyback agreement is a "consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the activity is for livelihood by self-employment and not excluded as resale or commercial purpose.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection Section 2(d) Consumer Protection Act commercial purpose self-employment

M/S NANDAN BIOMATRIX LTD. v. S. AMBIKA DEVI & ORS.

06 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a small farmer growing crops under a buyback agreement is a "consumer" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and is entitled to its protection against seed companies.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant consumer protection Section 2(d) Consumer Protection Act commercial purpose self-employment

Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

06 Mar 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah; S. R... · 2020 INSC 294

The Supreme Court held that under Section 24(2) of the Land Acquisition Act, 2013, acquisition lapses only if neither possession is taken nor compensation is paid (tendered), reading 'or' conjunctively, and clarified the meaning of 'paid' and the effect of interim court orders.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013 Land Acquisition Act 1894 Interpretation of 'paid' and 'tender' Lapsing of acquisition

Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal

06 Mar 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; Vineet Saran; M. R. Shah; S. R...
Cites 8 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act only if both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid (tendered), interpreting 'or' conjunctively and clarifying that tendering compensation suffices even if refused.

property appeal_allowed Significant Section 24 Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation payment

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/s Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd.

06 Mar 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court upheld that EOUs undertaking job-work for DTA units with valid permissions under the EXIM Policy are entitled to exemption from excise duty under the relevant notification, rejecting Revenue's demand for duty and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Export Oriented Unit EXIM Policy Central Excise Act exemption notification

M.S. Bhavani and Anr. v. M.S. Raghu Nandan

05 Mar 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a Will granting absolute ownership to a widow over property empowers her to validly sell it without consulting heirs, rendering a clandestine sale deed binding despite heirs' objections.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will interpretation absolute ownership life interest sale deed validity

Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/s. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari · 2020 INSC 279

The Supreme Court held that a company succeeding a partnership firm by conversion under Part IX of the Companies Act is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act for infrastructure projects entered into by the firm.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA deduction Part IX Companies Act conversion of partnership firm statutory vesting

Commissioner of Income Tax, Udaipur v. M/s. Chetak Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a company succeeding a partnership firm under Part IX of the Companies Act is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80-IA of the Income Tax Act for operating an infrastructure facility, as all rights and liabilities vest by operation of law in the company.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 80-IA deduction Part IX Companies Act conversion of partnership firm statutory vesting

Suborno Bose v. Enforcement Directorate

05 Mar 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a Managing Director who takes charge after an initial contravention under FEMA but fails to rectify the continuing offence is liable for penalty under Section 10(6) and Section 42 of the FEMA Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 Section 10(6) FEMA Continuing offence Managing Director liability

Manoj Suryavanshi v. State of Chhattisgarh

05 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Indira Banerjee; M. R. Shah
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of the appellant for the brutal murder of three minor children based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence and proper procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence death penalty Section 302 IPC Section 364 IPC

Mankastu Impex Private Limited v. Airvisual Limited

05 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna; Hrishikesh Roy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the arbitration seat being Hong Kong excludes Indian courts' jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to appoint an arbitrator, dismissing the petition accordingly.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant seat of arbitration venue of arbitration international commercial arbitration Section 11 Arbitration Act