Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Food Corporation of India v. Brihanmumbai Mahanagar Palika

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that property tax cannot be levied on Central Government-owned godowns constructed after the Constitution's commencement, exempt under Article 285, and occupier liability under municipal law cannot override this exemption.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 285 property tax exemption Union property Municipal Corporation Act 1888

State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vijay Shankar Dubey

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that a rationally fixed cut-off date for pay scale revision benefits cannot be retrospectively extended to employees who retired before that date, setting aside the High Court's order granting such benefit to a retired Joint Director, Prosecution.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant pay scale revision Fifth Pay Commission Joint Director Prosecution retirement benefits

Ram Chandra Prasad Singh v. Sharad Yadav

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; M. R. Shah
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of additional evidence relating to subsequent conduct in a disqualification petition under the Tenth Schedule, affirming that disqualification relates back to the date of voluntary giving up of party membership.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Tenth Schedule Disqualification Voluntarily given up membership Rajya Sabha

B K Pavithra v. Union of India

19 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2020 INSC 321

The Supreme Court dismissed applications seeking directions on implementing the Reservation Act 2018, holding that substantive challenges to implementation must be pursued through independent remedies and not by miscellaneous applications circumventing finality of its judgment.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Reservation Act 2018 post-based reservation creamy layer Miscellaneous Applications

B K Pavithra v. Union of India

19 Mar 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud

The Supreme Court dismissed applications seeking directions on implementing the Reservation Act 2018, holding that substantive challenges to government actions post-judgment must be pursued through independent proceedings and not by miscellaneous applications circumventing the review process.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Reservation Act 2018 post-based reservation creamy layer Order XII Rule 3

Dhanpat v. Sheo Ram

19 Mar 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta · 2020 INSC 316

The Supreme Court restored the validity of a Will duly executed and attested, holding that secondary evidence of a lost Will is admissible and that the High Court erred in overturning concurrent factual findings of the lower courts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will execution Indian Succession Act Secondary evidence Attesting witnesses

Dhanpat v. Sheo Ram

19 Mar 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of a Will executed in compliance with statutory requirements, restored concurrent factual findings, and dismissed the suit challenging the Will's execution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Will execution Indian Succession Act attesting witnesses secondary evidence

Benedict Denis Kinny v. Tulip Brian Miranda & Ors.

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that High Courts have constitutional jurisdiction under Article 226 to grant interim and final reliefs staying statutory retrospective termination of election under Section 5B of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 High Court jurisdiction Caste validity certificate Section 5B Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act

Gurcharan Singh & Ors. v. Angrez Kaur & Anr.

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a decree based on admitted pre-existing rights relating to immovable property does not require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act and restored the trial court's decree declaring appellants as owners.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act Section 17 compromise decree immovable property family settlement

Gurcharan Singh & Ors. v. Angrez Kaur & Anr.

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that a decree based on admitted pre-existing rights relating to immovable property does not require registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act and restored the trial court's valid decree dismissing the heirs' challenge.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Registration Act Section 17 compromise decree immovable property Will execution and proof

Akshay Kumar Singh v. Union of India

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the President's rejection of a mercy petition, holding that judicial review is limited and no grounds for interference existed.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition judicial review President of India Article 72

Akshay Kumar Singh v. Union of India

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the petition challenging the President’s rejection of a mercy petition, holding that judicial review is limited and no grounds for interference existed.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant mercy petition judicial review Article 72 Constitution of India President of India

Mukesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A.S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 311

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition under Article 32 challenging the criminal conviction after all statutory and constitutional remedies were exhausted and found no merit to interfere.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 32 writ petition criminal conviction appeal

Mukesh v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; Ashok Bhushan; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the conviction and rejection of the Mercy Petition, affirming the finality of judicial and executive decisions after exhaustive legal remedies.

criminal petition_dismissed Article 32 Constitution of India Mercy Petition criminal conviction judicial review

Shyam Sahni v. Arjun Prakash and Others

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the Single Judge's order directing the respondent to deposit his passport to ensure presence and compliance in civil contempt proceedings related to a property dispute.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passport deposit civil contempt undertaking equitable mortgage

Shyam Sahni v. Arjun Prakash and Others

19 Mar 2020 · R. Banumathi; A. S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court upheld the Single Judge’s order directing respondent No.1 to deposit his passport to ensure presence and compliance in contempt proceedings arising from a property dispute, setting aside the Division Bench’s contrary order.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contempt proceedings passport deposit civil suit property dispute

Nand Ram v. Jagdish Prasad

19 Mar 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta · 2020 INSC 315

The Supreme Court held that a Reference Court's finding on lease termination for compensation purposes does not operate as res judicata on possession, and a landlord's suit for possession against a tenant at sufferance filed within 12 years of lease expiry is not barred by limitation under Article 67 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata lease termination tenant at sufferance limitation period

Nand Ram v. Jagdish Prasad

19 Mar 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a prior court's incidental finding on lease termination does not operate as res judicata in a possession suit, and that a landlord's suit against a tenant at sufferance filed within 12 years of lease expiry is not barred by limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant res judicata lease termination tenant at sufferance limitation period

Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

19 Mar 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that additional tax under Section 143(1-A) can only be levied where there is an attempt to evade tax, and quashed the additional tax demand arising from a bona fide mistake in depreciation claim where the assessee remained in loss.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 143(1-A) Income Tax Act additional income tax tax evasion bona fide mistake

West Bengal Small Industries Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. M/S. Sona Promoters Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

18 Mar 2020 · S. Abdul Nazeer; Deepak Gupta · 2020 INSC 309

The Supreme Court held that a government company is a government undertaking under the Act, but tenancy of bare land without structures does not constitute government premises, rendering eviction under the Act invalid.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Government undertaking Government premises West Bengal Government Premises (Tenancy Regulation) Act, 1976 bare land tenancy