Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Chebrolu Leela Prasad Rao v. State of A.P.

22 Apr 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; Vineet Saran; M.R. Shah; Aniru...

The Supreme Court upheld the Governor's power under Schedule V to provide 100% reservation for Scheduled Tribe teachers in scheduled areas, ruling that such orders override fundamental rights and do not conflict with Article 371D.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Schedule V Paragraph 5(1) Governor's power Scheduled Areas

Hira Singh and Another v. Union of India and Another

22 Apr 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that for punishment under the NDPS Act, the entire weight of the narcotic drug mixture including neutral substances must be considered, overruling the earlier decision that considered only pure drug content.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act narcotic drugs psychotropic substances neutral substances

Hira Singh and Another v. Union of India and Another

22 Apr 2020 · Arun Mishra; Indira Banerjee; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that for punishment under the NDPS Act, the entire mixture including neutral substances must be considered in determining quantity thresholds, overruling the earlier decision that considered only pure drug content.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act narcotic drugs psychotropic substances neutral substances

Anjuman E Shiate Ali & Anr. v. Gulmohar Area Societies Welfare Group & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy · 2020 INSC 343

The Supreme Court upheld that plots reserved as open spaces in an approved 1967 layout cannot be used for construction despite a subsequent development plan indicating residential use.

property appeal_dismissed Significant approved layout open space reservation Development Control Regulations Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act

Anjuman E Shiate Ali & Anr. v. Gulmohar Area Societies Welfare Group & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld that plots reserved as open spaces in an approved 1967 layout cannot be used for construction despite a subsequent development plan showing them as residential.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Development Control Regulations approved layout open space reservation Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act

Mayor Municipal Corporation v. Govind Bajirao Navpute

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy · 2020 INSC 341

The Supreme Court upheld the mandatory nature of statutory timelines under the MRTP Act, dismissed the appeal, and affirmed the High Court's quashing of the draft development plan notification and illegal extension of time.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 26 MRTP Act draft development plan time limit mandatory

Mayor Municipal Corporation v. Govind Bajirao Navpute

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a delayed draft development plan notification under the MRTP Act, affirming the mandatory nature of statutory time limits and the limited jurisdiction of delegated authorities to grant extensions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Section 26 MRTP Act Section 21(4A) MRTP Act draft development plan

Shankar Sakharam Kenjale v. Narayan Krishna Gade

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that the mortgagor’s right of redemption survives the resumption and regrant of watan land under the Abolition Act, and any advantage gained by the mortgagee through regrant must be held for the mortgagor’s benefit under Section 90 of the Indian Trusts Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant mortgage right of redemption Mirashi tenant watan land

Shankar Sakharam Kenjale v. Narayan Krishna Gade

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a permanent Mirashi tenant’s right of redemption survives the Abolition Act and re-grant to the mortgagee, who must hold the benefit of re-grant for the mortgagor under Section 90 of the Indian Trusts Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mortgage right of redemption Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950 Mirashi tenant

Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh v. Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh

17 Apr 2020 · R. Banumathi; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s quashing of the RIMS Director recruitment advertisement, holding that non-notification of amended rules does not invalidate recruitment and eligibility criteria are within employer’s discretion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Regional Institute of Medical Sciences Director appointment Recruitment rules Medical Council of India Regulations

Pravakar Mallick & Anr. v. The State of Orissa & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's quashing of a Government Resolution granting consequential seniority to SC/ST promotees without valid legislation or executive order under Article 16(4A), reaffirming the "Catch Up Rule" and constitutional mandates for reservation in promotion.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 16(4A) reservation in promotion consequential seniority Catch Up Rule

Pravakar Mallick & Anr. v. The State of Orissa & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of a State Government Resolution granting consequential seniority to SC/ST promotees without valid legislation or executive order complying with Article 16(4A), reaffirming the applicability of the 'Catch Up Rule'.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant Article 16(4A) reservation in promotion consequential seniority Catch Up Rule

Chander Mohan Negi & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of teacher appointments under Himachal Pradesh government schemes made to fill urgent vacancies despite initial irregularities, dismissing delayed challenges and allowing regularisation based on long service and acquired qualifications.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Primary Assistant Teacher Scheme Para Teachers Policy Regularisation of teachers Recruitment and Promotion Rules

Chander Mohan Negi & Ors. v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.

17 Apr 2020 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court upheld the Himachal Pradesh High Court’s dismissal of challenges to teacher appointments made under special government schemes, allowing regularization of long-serving appointees despite initial irregularities.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Primary Assistant Teacher Scheme Para Teachers Policy Regularization of teachers Recruitment and Promotion Rules

Sushilaben Indravadan Gandhi v. The New India Assurance Company Limited

15 Apr 2020 · Rohinton Fali Nariman; S. Ravindra Bhat

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Gujarat High Court's judgment, holding that the insurance company is liable to honor the petitioners' valid claim under the policy.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Special Leave Petition insurance claim appeal High Court judgment

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. Mohani Devi & Anr.

15 Apr 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna · 2020 INSC 337

The Supreme Court held that voluntary retirement requires acceptance by the employer and resignation accepted with terminal benefits cannot be treated as voluntary retirement, but gratuity is payable on resignation after qualifying service.

civil appeal_allowed Significant voluntary retirement resignation retiral benefits disciplinary proceedings

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. & Ors. v. Mohani Devi & Anr.

15 Apr 2020 · R. Banumathi; A.S. Bopanna

The Supreme Court held that voluntary retirement requires acceptance by the employer and resignation once accepted cannot be converted into voluntary retirement, but gratuity is payable upon resignation after qualifying service.

labor appeal_allowed Significant voluntary retirement resignation disciplinary proceedings deemed acceptance

The State of Andhra Pradesh v. M/s Linde India Ltd

13 Apr 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi · 2020 INSC 334

The Supreme Court held that Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP qualify as drugs under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and are taxable under the lower rate Entry 88 of Schedule IV of the Andhra Pradesh VAT Act, 2005.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Oxygen IP Nitrous Oxide IP Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940 Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2005

The State of Andhra Pradesh v. M/s Linde India Ltd

13 Apr 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that Medical Oxygen IP and Nitrous Oxide IP qualify as drugs under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, and are taxable under the lower rate Entry 88 of Schedule IV of the Andhra Pradesh VAT Act, 2005.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Medical Oxygen IP Nitrous Oxide IP Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Entry 88 Schedule IV

Shivraj Singh Chouhan v. Speaker Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly

13 Apr 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that the Governor cannot direct a floor test in a running Assembly without a motion of no confidence and that acceptance of MLA resignations lies exclusively with the Speaker after due inquiry.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Governor's power floor test resignation of MLA Speaker's discretion