Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

Ajoy Debbarma v. State of Tripura

05 Aug 2020 · Uday Umesh Lalit; Vineet Saran

The Supreme Court upheld the quashing of illegal teacher appointments in Tripura, denied recognition of past service, allowed age relaxation for fresh recruitment, and dismissed attempts to reopen final judgments by non-parties.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant illegal appointments teacher recruitment age relaxation natural justice

The Chairman, Board of Trustees, Cochin Port Trust v. M/S Arebee Star Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd.

05 Aug 2020 · R. F. Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Banerjee

The Supreme Court held that steamer agents fall within the inclusive definition of 'owner' under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, making them liable for ground rent and port charges even beyond 75 days if goods remain uncleared and containers undestuffed, rejecting the relevance of title passing to consignees for such liability.

civil other Significant Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 ground rent steamer agent liability Port Trust lien

Ravinder Kaur Grewal v. Manjit Kaur

31 Jul 2020 · A.M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that a bona fide memorandum of family settlement recording an existing arrangement acted upon by parties does not require registration and is binding, restoring the first appellate Court's decree in favor of the plaintiff's ownership of the suit property.

civil appeal_allowed Significant family settlement memorandum of family settlement registration of documents Section 17(2)(v) Registration Act

B.B.M ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

30 Jul 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Ban... · 2020 INSC 472
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of a belated Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, emphasizing minimal judicial interference and reducing the post-award interest rate from 18% to 15%.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Judicial interference

B.B.M ENTERPRISES v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL

30 Jul 2020 · R.F. Nariman; Rohinton Fali Nariman; Navin Sinha; Indira Ban...

The Supreme Court upheld the arbitral Award as not barred by limitation, reduced the post-award interest rate, and set aside the High Court’s remand order, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Limitation period Judicial interference

Prem Chand v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's conviction for food adulteration due to lack of conclusive evidence and upheld the trial court's acquittal.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 food adulteration Haldi Powder public analyst report

Prem Chand v. State of Haryana

30 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the trial court's acquittal, holding that the prosecution failed to prove food adulteration beyond reasonable doubt under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 food adulteration public analyst report benefit of doubt

DR. ASWATHY R.S. KARTHIKA v. DR. ARCHANA M.

29 Jul 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court held that reservation shortfall for the Hindu Nadar community must be compensated from future vacancies and upheld appointments made from the 2015 rank list, restoring the Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation shortfall Hindu Nadar community Kerala Public Service Commission rank list

DR. ASWATHY R.S. KARTHIKA v. DR. ARCHANA M.

29 Jul 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; HEMANT GUPTA; S. RAVINDRA BHAT

The Supreme Court upheld the entitlement of Hindu Nadar community candidates to reservation benefits by directing the Kerala Public Service Commission to fill shortfall vacancies from the subsequent rank list, restoring the Tribunal's order and setting aside the High Court judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant reservation Hindu Nadar community Other Backward Classes Kerala Public Service Commission

Union of India & Ors. v. Lt. Col. S. S. Bedi

29 Jul 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Ex. Lt. Col. Bedi for outraging the modesty of patients, restored his cashiering sentence, and clarified that pension forfeiture requires a separate order under the Army Act or Pension Regulations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC cashiering Army Act 1950 Army Pension Regulations 1961

Union of India & Ors. v. Lt. Col. S. S. Bedi

29 Jul 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Hemant Gupta; S. Ravindra Bhat
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Ex. Lt. Col. Bedi for outraging the modesty of patients, restored his cashiering sentence, and clarified that pension forfeiture requires a separate order under the Army Act or Pension Regulations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC cashiering Army Act 1950 Army Pension Regulations 1961

Parminder Kaur @ P.P. Kaur @ Soni v. State of Punjab

28 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to material contradictions, procedural lapses, and failure of prosecution to negate the accused's plausible defence under Section 313 CrPC in a case under Sections 366A and 506 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 366A IPC Section 506 IPC Section 313 CrPC reasonable doubt

Parminder Kaur v. State of Punjab

28 Jul 2020 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Krishna Murari

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to material contradictions, inadequate investigation, and failure to effectively rebut her defense under Section 313 CrPC, emphasizing the need for careful scrutiny of evidence in criminal trials involving minors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 366A IPC Section 506 IPC Section 313 CrPC reasonable doubt

Erudhaya Priya v. State Express Transport Corporation Ltd.

27 Jul 2020 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Ajay Rastogi; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced motor accident compensation to Rs. 41.69 lakh applying the correct multiplier and disability factors, awarding 9% interest, thereby clarifying principles for assessing loss of earning capacity and future prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation multiplier method permanent disability loss of earning capacity

Shailendra Swarup v. Deputy Director, Enforcement Directorate

27 Jul 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that a director can be penalized under Section 68 of FERA only if proved to be in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the time of contravention, and set aside penalty imposed on a part-time non-executive director without such proof.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 Section 68 FERA Director liability Part-time non-executive director

Bhagwan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand

26 Jul 2020 · S.A. Bobde; B.R. Gavai; Surya Kant

The Supreme Court modified the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part 2 IPC, holding that firing a gun in a crowded place with knowledge of likely fatal consequences but without intent constitutes culpable homicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC

R. Palanisamy & Ors. v. The Registrar General High Court of Madras & Ors.

24 Jul 2020 · S. A. Bobde; A. S. Bopanna; V. Ramasubramanian

The Supreme Court upheld that promotion to Junior Bailiff post requires prescribed SSLC qualification under Special Rules, dismissing claims based on prior judgments or the 2016 Act.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant promotion Junior Bailiff educational qualification SSLC

Sunil Rathee & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Ors.

23 Jul 2020 · Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of a writ petition challenging Haryana's 10% economically weaker sections reservation to itself under Article 139A, finding the legal questions substantially the same as pending appeals on similar issues.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 139A Constitution of India reservation economically weaker sections 10% reservation

Sunil Rathee & Ors. v. The State of Haryana & Ors.

23 Jul 2020 · Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court allowed transfer of a writ petition challenging Haryana's 10% reservation for economically weaker sections to itself under Article 139A, holding that the legal questions involved are substantially the same as those in pending Gujarat appeals and are of general importance.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Article 139A reservation economically weaker sections 10% reservation

Union of India & Anr v. N K Srivasta & Ors

23 Jul 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indu Malhotra; K M Joseph · 2020 INSC 462

The Supreme Court upheld the NCDRC's finding of medical negligence against Safdarjung Hospital, dismissed the appeal, and left open the general question of the hospital's consumer jurisdiction for future cases with proper factual foundation.

consumer_protection appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence consumer protection jurisdiction free medical services