Delhi High Court
63,782 judgments
LAKSARRAILWAY STATION VIKRETA AND ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed petitioners to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to challenge a fresh policy, disposing of the petitions accordingly.
ERA Infra Engineering Ltd. v. Central Public Works Department & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain invocation of a performance bank guarantee, holding it lacked jurisdiction and that invocation is permissible despite disputes over delay compensation.
Accessories World Car Audio Pvt Ltd v. Capital First Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of a commercial appeal by recording the parties' out-of-court settlement involving payment of Rs. 2.3 crore in instalments.
Krishna Flour Mills (Bangalore) Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Finance to provide certified copies of old BIFR case documents to the petitioners within a reasonable timeframe to assist in pending NCLT litigation.
National Insurance Co Ltd. v. Munna @ Munna Khan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the multiplier for loss of dependency in motor accident claims must be based on the claimant’s age, not the deceased’s, reducing the compensation accordingly.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar; Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd. v. Prema Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for motor accident victims, rejecting contributory negligence despite the rickshaw traveling on the wrong side, but reduced the interest rate on compensation from 12% to 9% per annum.
Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Ashok Kumar; Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd v. Prema Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation awards but reduced the interest rate from 12% to 9% per annum, rejecting contributory negligence against injured passengers traveling in a rickshaw driven on the wrong side.
K.V. Prateek Enterprises v. IL&FS Engineering & Engineering Construction Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a valid arbitration agreement mandates referral of disputes to arbitration, and prior refusal or failure to initiate arbitration by a party does not waive this right.
DR N L VAISH AND ANR v. VIRENDER BANSAL AND ORS
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside costs imposed on plaintiffs who proved through medical evidence that the lead plaintiff's serious and continuing illness justified waiver of costs for procedural non-compliance.
M/S LOCHAV STORE v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside the suspension of a Fair Price Shop license as the suspension period exceeded the statutory maximum of three months without conclusion of proceedings.
M/S CEAT FINANCIAL SERVICE LTD. v. M/S H-LON HOISIERY LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition to dissolve H-Lon Hosiery Ltd. under liquidation, discharging the Liquidator and directing transfer of undistributed assets to the Reserve Bank of India.
Hargyan Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DDA's allotment cost policy, holding that no Scheduled Caste priority applies under the tail-end allotment policy and the petitioner was correctly charged the 1992-1993 cost without interest.
M.S AIR CAR AIRLINES PVT. LTD v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Appellate Authority to hear and dispose of the petitioner's appeal on merits while extending interim protection during the appeal's pendency.
Akashvani Announcers Association v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner’s objections during the re-verification of association recognitions and allowed the petitioner to seek further legal remedies if aggrieved.
ASERGIS TELECOM SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside TDSAT's order vacating interim stay on telecom licence termination, holding that termination based on new information requires prior procedural compliance under licence conditions.
Vinod Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed allotment of a first floor government quarter to the petitioner considering his mother’s age and allowed consideration of relocation allowance due to redevelopment, while clarifying the order is non-precedential.
LT. COL NAVEEN KUMAR ANAND (RETD.) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a premature writ petition under Article 226 seeking RTI information for failure to exhaust statutory remedies under the RTI Act, 2005.
Prem Shanker v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed allotment of a ground floor government quarter to a petitioner shifted due to redevelopment, considering his child's medical condition, and permitted application for relocation allowance.
M/S Synergy Telecommunications & Ors. v. M/S Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file their written statements beyond the stipulated time under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC, setting aside the trial court's order striking off their defense, emphasizing the directory nature of procedural provisions and the court's discretion to prevent injustice.
M/S Synergy Telecommunications & Ors. v. M/S Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the time limit for filing written statements under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is directory, allowed the petitioners to file their written statements despite delay, and set aside the trial court's order striking off their defence subject to costs.