Delhi High Court

62,488 judgments

Year:

Chandan Prajapati v. Suresh Kumar Azad

14 Dec 2016 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1486-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order setting aside disciplinary proceedings for failure to prove documents through witnesses, reaffirming that documents alone cannot establish charges in departmental inquiries.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental disciplinary proceedings proof of documents quasi-judicial inquiry witness testimony

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekha Balyan & Ors.

07 Dec 2016 · J.R. Midha · 2017:DHC:7607
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for death in a motor vehicle accident based on evidence of income and future prospects but set aside the penal interest imposed by the Claims Tribunal.

civil appeal_partially_allowed Significant compensation motor vehicle accident loss of dependency future prospects

Sanjay Tyagi v. Delhi Development Authority

25 Nov 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7082
Cites 1 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and directed disputes to be resolved under the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, overruling an unworkable arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Appointment of arbitrator Delhi International Arbitration Centre

BMW India Private Limited v. Libra Automotives Private Limited & Ors.

23 Nov 2016 · Sanjeev Narula · 2019:DHC:3275

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking interim security under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, holding that disputed claims and lack of clear intent to frustrate enforcement preclude granting such relief without crystallized liability.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act interim relief bank guarantee Order 38 Rule 5 CPC

Sanjay Mishra & Anr. v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

17 Nov 2016 · P. S. Teji · 2017:DHC:7037

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498-A IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute

M/S Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd v. Manav Sethi & Anr.

15 Nov 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5255

A Section 21 notice invoking arbitration is mandatory before filing a Section 11(6) petition for appointment of an arbitrator; absence of such notice renders the petition not maintainable.

arbitration appeal_dismissed Significant Section 21 notice Section 11(6) petition Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Unilateral appointment of arbitrator

CMYK PRINTECH LTD. v. UNITED INDIA PERIODICALS PVT. LTD.

09 Nov 2016 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; A. K. CHAWLA · 2018:DHC:1866-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a mediated settlement in a lease dispute, ruling that the appellant ratified its representative's authority despite a purported revocation, and dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside the settlement on grounds of fraud and lack of authority.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant settlement agreement authority of representative ratification Board Resolution

National Highway Authority of India v. GVK Jaipur Expressway Pvt. Ltd.

09 Nov 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8818
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting compensation to a toll operator for loss of revenue due to statutory suspension of toll collection following demonetization, holding the event constituted a change in law under the concession agreement.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Change in Law Concession Agreement Demonetization Toll Collection

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. General Secretary, All India Kamgar Union

26 Oct 2016 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1946

The Delhi High Court set aside a labor commissioner's award directing equal pay to contract workers, holding that no employer-employee relationship existed between the principal employer and contractor's employees performing dissimilar work.

labor appeal_allowed Significant equal pay for equal work contract labour principal to principal contract employer-employee relationship

Delhi Police v. Ajit Singh

25 Oct 2016 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 8862
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld that acquittal on benefit of doubt in criminal proceedings bars departmental action under Rule 12 of DPPAR, leading to quashing of disciplinary proceedings and reinstatement of the police officer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant acquittal on benefit of doubt departmental proceedings Delhi Police (Punishment and Appeals) Rules, 1980 Rule 12 DPPAR

Sub-Inspector Deovert Upadhyay & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Oct 2016 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:2921-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court held that downward pay fixation without notice and recovery of excess payments beyond five years are impermissible, quashing such orders against CISF Assistant Sub Inspectors.

administrative petition_allowed Significant downward pay fixation recovery of excess payment notice requirement Fundamental Rule 27

Union of India v. GNCT of Delhi and Ors.

21 Oct 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2019:DHC:200
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the 2016 Ministry of Defence guidelines supersede earlier restrictions, allowing construction beyond 10 meters from defence establishments without NOC, and dismissed the Commandant's challenge to the hospital building near Ordnance Depot Shakur Basti.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate Ministry of Defence guidelines Works of Defence Act 1903 Ordnance Depot security

Narendra Singh v. Bureau of Indian Standards

07 Oct 2016 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2017:DHC:4059

The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative transfer of a BIS officer to Kolkata, directing only that the employer reconsider the officer's representation before finalizing the transfer.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order Placement Policy administrative exigency mala fide

Dr. B.K. Tiwari v. Union of India

07 Oct 2016 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:691-DB
Cites 5 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking pay parity for Advisor (Nutrition) with Advisor (Ayurveda) and Advisor (Homeopathy), upholding the 5th Central Pay Commission's pay scale recommendations and emphasizing judicial restraint in pay fixation matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay parity Advisor Nutrition Advisor Ayurveda Advisor Homeopathy

Ved Prakash Lamba v. Satyapal Lamba

24 Sep 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:797
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a second appeal in a joint property dispute, holding that concurrent factual findings on joint possession and injunctions cannot be disturbed absent a substantial question of law.

civil appeal_dismissed second appeal Section 100 CPC substantial question of law joint ownership

Scrum Alliance, Inc v. Mr. Prem Kumar S. & Ors.

22 Sep 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:8346
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the defendants infringed the plaintiff's registered Certification Trade Marks "CERTIFIED SCRUMMASTER" and "CSM" by unauthorized use of identical and deceptively similar marks and logos, granting injunction against the defendants.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Certification Trade Mark Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 75 infringement Section 76(3) protection

Mohammad Javed Malik v. Jamia Millia Islamia

02 Sep 2016 · Yogesh Khanna · 2022:DHC:662

The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of Dr. Nazim Hussain Al-Jafri as Professor at Jamia Millia Islamia under the Vice-Chancellor's emergency powers and Executive Council ratification, dismissing the writ petition challenging its legality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Jamia Millia Islamia Act, 1988 Section 11(3) Statute 25(8) Vice-Chancellor emergency powers

Gopakumar Gopinathen v. Bergen Associates P Ltd

20 Aug 2016 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:4881

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order dismissing the petitioner’s application challenging territorial jurisdiction based on an exclusive jurisdiction clause in the service contract, dismissing the petition under Section 115 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant exclusive jurisdiction clause Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 115 CPC territorial jurisdiction

B.K. College v. National Council for Teacher Education

01 Jul 2016 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3370

The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a teacher education institution for procedural lapses and directed fresh inspection and due process before any adverse action.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant NCTE recognition withdrawal Teacher Education Institution shifting premises Section 17(1) NCTE Act show cause notice

TOSHIBA INDIA PVT LTD v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

24 Jun 2016 · S. Muralidhar; I. S. Mehta · 2019:DHC:7396-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court held that interest paid on customs duty is deductible only in the year of actual payment under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, allowing deduction in AY 2016-17 but not in earlier years.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal customs duty interest deduction Section 43B Income Tax Act assessment year