Delhi High Court

62,488 judgments

Year:

Mohsin Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

14 Jul 2017 · Pratibha Rani · 2017:DHC:3554

The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges for rape, intimidation, and extortion, holding that at the charge framing stage, the court must consider prima facie material and grave suspicion without weighing evidence or relying on anticipatory bail observations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant charge framing Section 227 CrPC prima facie case grave suspicion

Sharda Devi Sanskrit Vidyapeeth v. Shri Ganesh Ram Bhatt & Anr.

14 Jul 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:3547-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the condonation of a 430-day delay in filing a statutory appeal against dismissal, emphasizing that statutory rights should not be defeated on technical grounds when delay is bona fide.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay statutory appeal Delhi School Education Act removal from service

Neeraj Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

14 Jul 2017 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:3546-DB

The Delhi High Court held that disability pension is payable when disability is attributable to or aggravated by government service, even if not directly caused or if qualifying service is incomplete.

service_law petition_allowed Significant disability pension government service attributable to aggravated by service

Shambhu & Anr v. M/S Sugan Drycleaners & Anr

14 Jul 2017 · Anu Malhotra · 2017:DHC:3535

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioners failed to prove an employer-employee relationship with M/s. Sugan Drycleaners and dismissed their claim of illegal termination.

labor petition_dismissed Significant employer-employee relationship burden of proof Indian Evidence Act illegal termination

Sameer Jain v. Sanjay Jain & Ors.

14 Jul 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:3545

A co-owner cannot unilaterally grant exclusive rights over common property without consent of other co-owners, and injunctions require prior determination of title or possession; partition is the proper remedy for co-ownership disputes.

civil petition_dismissed Significant co-ownership injunction partition exclusive possession

Uday Khanna v. Preeti Khanna & Others

14 Jul 2017 · Manmohan · 2017:DHC:3538

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to challenge a registered Gift Deed as forged, holding that amendments filed promptly after a defence is raised should be allowed without examining merits at the amendment stage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC Gift Deed forgery

Ravi Singhal v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Anr

14 Jul 2017 · Indermeet Kaur, J. · 2017:DHC:3537

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking migration of an MBBS student, holding that migration is permissible only on genuine grounds between recognized medical colleges under the Medical Council of India regulations and that the petitioner failed to meet these criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant migration medical education Graduate Medical Education Regulations Ordinance 7

Narottam Mishra v. Election Commission of India

14 Jul 2017 · Indermeet Kaur · 2017:DHC:3536

The Delhi High Court upheld the Election Commission's order disqualifying a legislator for failure to correctly account election expenses related to paid news, emphasizing the Commission's broad powers and the civil nature of inquiry under Section 10-A of the Representation of People Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Representation of People Act, 1951 Section 10-A Election expenses Paid news

Anshu Gupta v. Sanjay Panchal & Anr.

14 Jul 2017 · R.K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:3544

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition, set aside the finding of contributory negligence against the claimant, and directed full compensation to be paid by the insurer.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence compensation site plan

Anubhav Jain v. Air India Ltd.

14 Jul 2017 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2017:DHC:3533

The Delhi High Court upheld the employer's contractual right to recover balance training costs with interest from a pilot who resigned prematurely, dismissing the defence based on a policy stopping salary deductions as untenable.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend training cost recovery loan agreement

Union of India and Anr. v. Jai Singh & Anr.

14 Jul 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:3557-DB

The Delhi High Court held that ad hoc promotions made in accordance with operative Recruitment Rules remain valid and must be regularized unless a bona fide policy decision defers such promotions, affirming that old Recruitment Rules continue until formally replaced.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Recruitment Rules Ad hoc promotion Regularization of promotion Article 309 Constitution

Vimal Kishor v. Northern Railway & Anr.

14 Jul 2017 · J. R. Midha · 2017:DHC:3560

The Delhi High Court held that both the principal employer and contractor are liable to ensure timely payment of compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, imposing penalty and interest for delay in a railway worker’s injury case.

labor petition_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act compensation principal employer liability contractor liability

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rohit Kumar

14 Jul 2017 · J. R. Midha · 2017:DHC:3559

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reassessing income, disability, and prosthetic costs, emphasizing actual earning capacity over minimum wages and excluding future prospects.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation loss of earning capacity functional disability

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rohit Kumar

14 Jul 2017 · J. R. Midha · 2017:DHC:3558

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a personal injury claimant by reassessing income, functional disability, and prosthetic limb costs, while dismissing the insurer's plea for reduction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation loss of earning capacity functional disability multiplier method

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajan @ Rajwati

14 Jul 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:3531

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal and upheld the tribunal’s enhanced compensation award following remand, directing prompt payment.

civil appeal_dismissed compensation insurance claim remand tribunal

Virender Kumar Syal v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. & Anr.

14 Jul 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:3532

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal, holding that a valid defence-issued driving licence negates the insurer's right to recover compensation from the insured in a motor accident claim.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant motor vehicular accident driving licence insurance recovery rights Ministry of Defence driving licence

Simplex Infrastructure Ltd v. Energo Engineering Projects Ltd & Anr

14 Jul 2017 · S. Muralidhar; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2017:DHC:3534-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the review petition holding that the Division Bench lacked jurisdiction to entertain the Section 9 arbitration petition under the retrospective Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and restored the petition for fresh hearing before a Single Judge.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 petition jurisdiction

M/s National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Sampati Devi & Ors.

14 Jul 2017 · R. K. Gauba · 2017:DHC:3530

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, insurers are liable to pay compensation irrespective of negligence.

motor_vehicle_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Section 163-A Motor Vehicles Act 1988 no-fault liability motor accident compensation insurance company liability

Pritam Singh v. Surender Kumar & Ors.

14 Jul 2017 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2017:DHC:3529

The Delhi High Court held that a legacy in a Will lapses if the legatee predeceases the testator without alternate disposition, and thus amendment to plead such a Will does not entitle heirs of the legatee to the legacy.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Indian Succession Act Section 105 legacy lapse Will

Suman Tiwari & Anr. v. Satish Kumar Bansal

14 Jul 2017 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2017:DHC:3525

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court’s decree for recovery of Rs. 8,70,000 loan with interest, holding that the defendants failed to disprove signed loan receipts and did not respond to the legal notice.

civil appeal_dismissed loan recovery loan receipts burden of proof Section 103 Indian Evidence Act