Delhi High Court
62,488 judgments
Radhey Shyam v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition under the old Act lapses if compensation is not paid or tendered within the statutory period under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, declaring the petitioner’s acquisition lapsed due to non-payment.
Mahak Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking declaration of lapse of land acquisition under the 2013 Act, holding that acquisition under the 1894 Act was complete with possession and compensation, and the petitioner lacked ownership and locus standi.
Umed Singh v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board; Hemant Kumar v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
The Delhi High Court held that the Member (Administration) of DUSIB is the competent disciplinary authority to issue show cause notices under Rule 19 of CCS (CCA) Rules, dismissing the petitioners' challenge to the notices issued post their absorption into DUSIB.
Harmala Singh Malik & Anr v. State & Ors
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly executed and registered Will with consent of all legal heirs, appointing the petitioners as executors of the estate.
Sanjeev Sharma v. Avinash Rastogi
The Delhi High Court granted leave to defend in a suit for recovery based on dishonoured cheques, holding that a triable issue regarding losses and credit notes justified conditional leave despite prior conviction under Section 138 NI Act.
Dimension Investment & Securities Ltd v. Uday Dutt Associates (P) Ltd
The Delhi High Court ordered winding up of Uday Dutt Associates (P) Ltd under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 for retaining ₹8.6 crores under frivolous accounts without explanation and failing to respond to statutory notices.
Samira Tramix Pvt. Ltd. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court allowed the Official Liquidator's petition for voluntary winding up of Samira Traxim Private Limited after finding full compliance with statutory requirements under the Companies Act, 1956.
State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Banti
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's leave petition challenging the acquittal in a rape and kidnapping case, holding that the trial court's judgment was not perverse despite contradictions and delay in FIR.
Sunil Jain & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession and compensation payment are not completed within five years, allowing the petitioners' claim to ownership.
Yudhvir Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or tendered within five years, and mere deposit in treasury is insufficient.
PEPSICO INC & ORS. v. DUGAR SPICES & EATABLES (P) LTD. & ORS.
Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction over foreign defendants and granted permanent injunction against trademark infringement of the well-known KURKURE mark.
Anil Kapoor v. State
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration with the Will annexed to the sole legal heir after holding the Will validly executed and unchallenged.
MODI- MUNDIPHARMA PVT. LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside the IPAB order cancelling the 'FECONTIN' trade mark, holding that use of an associated trade mark satisfies the use requirement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Sunil Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or tendered within five years and possession is not taken, applying this to portions of the petitioner’s land where these conditions were unmet.
Rattan Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition of land lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid or tendered within five years, declaring the petitioner’s land acquisition lapsed due to non-payment and non-possession.
Lajjawati v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapses under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if compensation is not paid and possession not taken within five years, and mere deposit in treasury does not satisfy payment requirement.
Parmod Jain & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession, allowing the writ petition.
IP Support Services (India) Pvt. Ltd & Anr v. Millenium Plaza Limited & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to maintenance charges under agreements containing arbitration clauses are not arbitrable and dismissed the defendants' application to refer the suit to arbitration.
MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT. LTD v. OMEX CABLES INDUSTRIES & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's interim injunction application against defendants' use of 'OMEX GOLD', holding no deceptive similarity with the registered trademark 'MEX' and noting plaintiff's inordinate delay in filing suit.
Shree Nath Heritage Liquor Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Octaga Green Power & Sugar Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that mere apprehension of trademark infringement without actual business presence or imminent threat in Delhi does not confer jurisdiction.