Delhi High Court

61,224 judgments

Year:

S Tech Info Pvt Ltd v. Lord Krishna Bank Limited

23 Aug 2017 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:4721-DB

Parmod Kumar Jain v. Satish Jain and Ors

23 Aug 2017 · Hima Kohli; Deepa Sharma · 2017:DHC:4722-DB

Jai Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation

23 Aug 2017 · Vipin Sanghi; Rekha Palli · 2017:DHC:4719-DB

Janmitr Fellowship v. The Chancellor, Indira Gandhi Delhi Technical University for Women

23 Aug 2017 · Acting Chief Justice Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2017:DHC:4703-DB

Ambuj Hotel and Real Estate Pvt Ltd v. Ministry of Railways and Anr.

22 Aug 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024 SCC Online SC 1754
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional objections under multiple agreements should be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal and referred the dispute over catering services on the Telangana Express to arbitration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) kompetenz-kompetenz principle exclusive jurisdiction clause

DELHI POLICE v. MUKESH CHAND YADAV

22 Aug 2017 · C. Hari Shankar; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:7957-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 21

The Delhi High Court held that a dismissed employee is not entitled to leave encashment and no interest on GPF is payable if the fund is released immediately upon application, setting aside the CAT's contrary order.

administrative appeal_allowed leave encashment dismissal from service Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 General Provident Fund

Tata Motors Limited v. Delhi Transport Corporation

16 Aug 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5996
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court held that the executing court must enforce post-award interest on the entire awarded amount including interest components as per the arbitral award, without excluding interest on interest, leaving legal objections to be addressed in substantive challenge proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitral award post-award interest interest on interest executing court

Jawaharlal Nehru University v. Geeta Kumari

09 Aug 2017 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:3787
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that protests obstructing ingress and egress within 100 meters of JNU's Administrative Block violated its order and constituted contempt, balancing the right to protest with institutional discipline.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant contempt of court peaceful protest Article 19(1)(a) administrative block

SERVOTECH ELECTRICALS PVT LTD v. PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD

04 Aug 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6451
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the existence of a valid arbitration agreement and timely petition mandates such appointment even if one party fails to act.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 notice Appointment of arbitrator

Ajay @ Bhagira v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

26 Jul 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4555

The Delhi High Court upheld a show cause notice under Section 50 of the Delhi Police Act against a petitioner involved in multiple criminal cases, dismissing his challenge for denial of defence evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Delhi Police Act, 1978 Section 50 show cause notice criminal propensity

Mahesh Chand Sharma v. Hari Chander @ Hariya

13 Jul 2017 · Mukta Gupta · 2018:DHC:4173

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a cheque dishonor case where the petitioner failed to prove the loan and the cheque was held to be a security cheque.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Cheque dishonor Loan agreement Security cheque

Ms. Pinky Pawar v. Jagmohan

13 Jul 2017 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of dismissal orders against postal assistants, holding that dismissal based solely on uncorroborated handwriting expert evidence and denial of relevant documents violates natural justice.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary inquiry handwriting expert evidence natural justice CFSL report

Union of India & Ors. v. Sumit

13 Jul 2017 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1344-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 11

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of the respondent's removal from service, holding that reliance solely on an uncorroborated handwriting expert report and failure to provide relevant documents and witnesses violated natural justice and rendered the disciplinary inquiry invalid.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings Rule 14 CCS(CCA) Rules natural justice handwriting expert evidence

Raj Kumar Roy v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors

05 Jul 2017 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:1639
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of the petitioner's bank account as 'fraud' due to non-supply of material documents and lack of personal hearing, directing the bank to comply with natural justice and RBI guidelines before passing any further order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice fraud classification bank account forensic audit report

Manish Kumar Sachar v. U.O.I & Ors.

04 Jul 2017 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:3982-DB
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary authorities must provide the UPSC's advisory opinion to the delinquent employee before imposing punishment, following the earlier Supreme Court precedent, and quashed the impugned order for non-communication.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Union Public Service Commission disciplinary proceedings natural justice communication of UPSC advice

Central Electricity Regulatory Commission v. The Additional Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence

28 Jun 2017 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:168-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Delhi High Court held that fees collected by electricity regulatory commissions in discharge of their statutory regulatory and quasi-judicial functions are not liable to GST under the CGST and IGST Acts.

tax petition_allowed Significant Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission Goods and Services Tax CGST Act, 2017

M/S THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI NORTH & ANR.

28 Jun 2017 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8799-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the GST liability on reinsurance services for the period 01.07.2017 to 24.01.2018 is regularized by the GST Council's circular and extended the benefit of such regularization to the petitioner despite earlier adverse orders.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST liability reinsurance services insurance schemes GST Council

FIVESTAR DEHYDRATION PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

09 Jun 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2021:DHC:1210
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent defaulted in complying with the arbitration clause in a contract dispute over supply specifications.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator defaulting party

Vijay Kumar Ojha v. Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd.

09 Jun 2017 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:2971
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's belated objection to territorial jurisdiction, holding that failure to raise such objection before framing issues results in waiver under Section 21 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction Section 21 CPC Order VII Rule 10 CPC cause of action

Shafique Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

07 Jun 2017 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:5620

The Delhi High Court reduced the sentence of appellant Shafique Khan under Section 392 IPC from eight to six years, granting release as he had already served more than the modified term, emphasizing parity and mitigating factors in sentencing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 392 IPC robbery sentence reduction parity in sentencing