Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

U. P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Rajan Raut & Anr.

22 Aug 2022 · Gaurang Kanth

The Delhi High Court upheld MACT awards holding the U.P. Roadways bus driver negligent and affirmed the quantum of compensation to injured claimants in a motor accident case.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence compensation multiplier

Overnite Express Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

22 Aug 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:3144

The Delhi High Court invalidated the respondent's restricted panel of arbitrators as biased and appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to ensure impartial dispute resolution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment Impartiality of arbitrator Panel of arbitrators

Dipti Purtti @ Sumita v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

18 Aug 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:3218
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that prolonged custody alone does not override the statutory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 bail commercial quantity

Vipin Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

18 Aug 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:3215

The Delhi High Court set aside prison punishment imposed without following mandatory procedural safeguards under the Delhi Prison Rules, emphasizing strict compliance with show-cause and inquiry requirements.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Delhi Prison Rules 2018 major punishment show-cause notice quasi-judicial inquiry

Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

18 Aug 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:3111-DB

The Delhi High Court held that premature reversion of deputationists without three months' advance notice as per DoPT guidelines is invalid and directed continuation of deputation until such notice is given.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant deputation premature reversion advance notice Office Memorandum 17.06.2010

Pankaj v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

18 Aug 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:3102-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence identification parade recovery of weapon

Tanishq Mishra v. National Testing Agency and Anr.

18 Aug 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:3123

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the authenticity of JEE Main score cards, holding that official electronic records of the National Testing Agency are presumptively authentic and disputed factual issues cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant JEE Main JEE Advanced National Testing Agency score card authenticity

Pankaj v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

18 Aug 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:3101-DB

Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of murder charges due to gaps and inconsistencies in prosecution's circumstantial evidence and eyewitness testimony.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder circumstantial evidence recovery of weapon

K.P.R. Nair v. Jyotika Oguz

18 Aug 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:3121

The High Court allowed the revision petitions setting aside the trial court’s dismissal order and directed impleadment of legal heirs and expeditious adjudication of the probate revocation petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Indian Succession Act Section 263 Hindu Succession Act Section 15(2)(b)

Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India

18 Aug 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:3186-DB

The Delhi High Court directed that petitioners must be granted a one-week period before enforcement of any adverse order rejecting their absorption claims, ensuring reasonable time to join the parent organization or seek legal remedies.

administrative petition_allowed Significant absorption repatriation reasonable time adverse order

Vipin Sharma v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

18 Aug 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:3214

The Delhi High Court set aside a prison punishment imposed without following mandatory procedural safeguards under the Delhi Prison Rules, emphasizing strict compliance with show-cause and inquiry requirements.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Delhi Prison Rules 2018 major punishment show-cause notice quasi-judicial inquiry

Farah Naaj v. Ali Hasan & Ors.

18 Aug 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:3171

The High Court allowed the revision petition, condoned delay in filing the written statement subject to costs, and directed the trial court to reconsider interlocutory applications afresh.

civil appeal_allowed written statement delay condonation Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC status quo order

Rita Wadhwa v. Sanjeev Sarin & Anr.

18 Aug 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:3117-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a consent decree based on a valid compromise inter se siblings, dismissing the appeal as barred under Section 96(3) CPC and emphasizing the binding nature of consent given by authorized counsel.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant consent decree compromise Order XXIII rule 3 CPC Section 96(3) CPC

All India Aircraft Engineers Association & Anr. v. Air India Engineering Services Limited & Anr.

18 Aug 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:3119

Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging appointment of Aircraft Maintenance Engineers, holding that compliance with DGCA's binding Civil Aviation Requirements justified appointment to lower grade and no writ relief was warranted.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Aircraft Maintenance Engineer DGCA Civil Aviation Requirements Staff Employment Notice

Pr. Commissioner of Central Tax v. M/S Anglo American Service (India) Pvt. Ltd.

18 Aug 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:3168-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed tax appeals below the prescribed threshold limit as not maintainable and condoned delay due to COVID-19 limitation extensions, directing prompt refund payment with interest.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 35G Central Excise Act 1944 appeal maintainability threshold limit tax refund

Sunita & Anr. v. Vijay Pal @ Mohd. Sabir & Anr.

18 Aug 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:3122

A subsequent maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. is barred by res judicata once maintenance has been granted on merits; alteration must be sought under Section 127 Cr.P.C.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. Section 127 Cr.P.C. maintenance res judicata

Shri Hari Singh v. Land and Building Department and Anr.

18 Aug 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:3120

Delhi High Court held that the Special Rehabilitation Package must be uniformly calculated for similarly situated landowners, directing recalculation and payment of arrears with interest to petitioners whose compensation was discriminately computed.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Special Rehabilitation Package Land Acquisition Article 14 Equal Treatment

Sh. Ram Lal Malhotra & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

18 Aug 2022 · Siddharth Mridul; Amit Sharma · 2022:DHC:3126-DB

The Delhi High Court granted limited supervised visitation rights to the biological parents and sisters of an incapacitated cardiologist in custody of his wife, while directing other reliefs to be pursued separately.

constitutional petition_allowed habeas corpus custody visitation rights incapacitated person

Tosh Apartment Pvt. Ltd v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors

18 Aug 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:3098

The Delhi High Court declared six sale deeds executed in violation of an injunction as null and void, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling that such clandestine transactions confer no title and must be cancelled.

civil appeal_allowed Significant sale deed injunction specific performance limitation

Shipali Sharma v. State

18 Aug 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:3143
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the brother-in-law from Section 498A IPC charges due to lack of specific allegations, emphasizing the need for prima facie material and cautioning against omnibus allegations in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 498A IPC cruelty harassment charge framing