Delhi High Court
28,224 judgments
APAR INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. SH RUMMY CHHABRA
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the trademark "VELLO" based on binding undertakings to cease use, withdraw conflicting applications, and dispose of existing stock.
Dr. Jitendra Pal Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to constitute a Special Review Medical Board to assess the petitioner's suitability for promotion and decide on his case within a specified timeframe.
M/S EUREKA FORBES LIMITED v. VAIBHAV AGRO INDUSTRIES
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendant’s use of the deceptively similar "AquaSure" mark, recognizing plaintiff’s prior trademark rights and passing off claim, but dismissed copyright infringement and damages claims.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sima Devi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the territorial jurisdiction of the Employees’ Compensation Commissioner and the imposition of penalty on the insurer for delayed compensation payment under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923.
Novamax Industries LLP v. Prem Appliances & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that prior publication of a registered design, established by the plaintiff's own documents, is a valid defence under the Designs Act, leading to vacation of the interim injunction against alleged design infringement.
Mohit Kumar Bharti & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following a genuine and voluntary settlement between estranged spouses and mutual consent divorce.
Sushil Pandey & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The High Court held that seniority lists for Uttar Pradesh Police promotions must strictly comply with statutory rules, excluding retired/deceased officers and properly integrating direct recruits and promotees, setting aside the flawed 2013 list.
Share Samadhan Limited v. Vinay Prakash Sadh
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to the respondent's failure to cooperate in arbitration proceedings as per the agreement.
The Indian Expressp Ltd v. The Indian Express Newspapers Workers Union Regd and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s award increasing the retirement age of Indian Express workers from 58 to 60 years, affirming the Tribunal’s jurisdiction despite certified Standing Orders under the SO Act.
M/S Sudhakara Infratech Private Limited v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that ambiguous tender clauses must be harmoniously construed to allow societies to participate, upholding the award to a Joint Venture including a society and dismissing the challenge to the tender outcome.
Rajender Kumar Gupta v. Gadiwala Load Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s appeal, setting aside the Trial Court’s cost imposition for seeking adjournment to amend the plaint at an early stage of the suit and directed disposal of the amendment application on merits.
Mohd Junaid Qureshi v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the applicant on the ground of parity with co-accused already on bail, holding that recovery of incriminating material alone does not bar bail when similar circumstances exist.
Punita Bhardwaj v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review seeking to quash demolition orders, holding that alternate statutory remedies before the MCD Tribunal must be exhausted before invoking writ jurisdiction.
Tata Steel BSL Limited v. Venus Recruiter Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that avoidance applications under Section 43 of the IBC cannot be adjudicated after conclusion of CIRP as the Resolution Professional’s mandate ends with approval of the resolution plan, limiting NCLT’s jurisdiction post-CIRP.
Deepak v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and related charges due to failure of the prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt amid inconsistencies and unreliable circumstantial evidence.
M/S ENGINEERING SYNDICATE v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Delhi High Court held that procedural amendments changing forum jurisdiction apply retrospectively, directing transfer of a 2008 arbitration suit to the District Courts based on the aggregate claim value.
Sana College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. college by NCTE and directed a re-inspection to verify compliance with regulations before passing a fresh order.
M/S Jai Singh and Co v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that NHAI's premature termination of fixed-term toll plaza contracts without following contractual procedures and on mere commercial considerations was arbitrary and violative of Article 14, quashing the fresh tenders issued during the subsistence of existing contracts.
Sundeep Kathuria v. Deputy Director of Income Tax, Investigation, DD/ADIT-INV-1-1, FAIU
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authority to adjudicate the show cause notice under the Black Money Act after granting personal hearing and passing a speaking order, emphasizing procedural fairness and timely disposal.
Ashwani Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the issuance of a non-bailable warrant against an absconding accused involved in a fake call center racket, holding that inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC should not be exercised to aid evasion of law.