Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Vikas Mehrotra v. VLS Capital Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that succession certificate proceedings do not affect the appellants' rights to challenge illegal transfer of shares in pending suits and dismissed their appeals seeking to restrain such proceedings.
NB SUB/SKT Chandra Prakash v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s writ seeking quashing of a transfer order due to non-disclosure of a prior dismissal of a similar petition and refused to impose costs in the interest of justice.
SANDISK LLC v. VASU TELECOM AND ORS
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a settlement agreement acknowledging plaintiff's trademark rights and defendants' undertakings, proceeding ex parte against an absent defendant.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. v. MS. REKHA HEMAL
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that the respondent's promotion to Lecturer (Selection Grade) without a Master's Degree was valid under the applicable AICTE notification dated 05.03.2010 and GNCTD office orders.
Capt. Hemalatha V. S. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the 1992 medical board's order declaring the petitioner unfit was not illegal but shall not bar her from civil employment, dismissing the petition due to delay.
Dole Nitin Madhukar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed manual re-evaluation of the petitioner’s OMR answer sheet and allowed his selection for BSF Sub-Inspector by creating a supernumerary post or borrowing a vacancy, granting him seniority with the original batch.
Commissioner of Customs (Airport & General) v. M/S R.P. Cargo Handling Services
The Delhi High Court held that under Regulation 20(1) of the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013, a show cause notice is validly issued when dispatched within ninety days of the offence report, irrespective of when it is received by the customs broker.
St. Marys Educational Society v. Sub Divisional Magistrate/Revenue Assistant & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition quashing orders of eviction and demolition under the DLRA, holding that the petitioner’s land was used solely for agricultural purposes and that denial of hearing violated natural justice.
6368ea4af64abfa150639880e1f9f5c3bca88efd415078c6e2fec82e2a6b7798
The court held that mixing colorants with base paint to produce different shades does not amount to 'production' of a new product under the Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948, and is therefore not taxable as production.
Nasheta Zaidi v. Central Board of Secondary Education
The Delhi High Court held that a student is entitled to full marks where the examiner’s tick marks indicate correctness, despite failure to award marks in the margin, and directed CBSE to correct the mark sheet accordingly.
Amazon Technologies Inc v. Lifestyle Equities CV & Anr
The Delhi High Court stayed a ₹336 crore trademark infringement decree against Amazon Technologies Inc, holding that unpleaded enhanced damages awarded ex parte violated natural justice and lacked evidentiary basis.
Jahangir Alom v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging discharge from BSF on medical grounds, upholding the medical board’s finding of mental unfitness and the consequent termination of service.
Shree Balaji Motors v. Hero Motocorp Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a Dealership Agreement between Shree Balaji Motors and Hero Motocorp Ltd.
Jain Shikanji Private Limited v. Satish Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an interim injunction restraining the appellant from using the trade mark "Jain Shikanji," affirming that combined generic words can form a protectable mark and emphasizing the limited scope of appellate interference in interlocutory matters.
Babu Lal Jain v. Vijay Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court directed the Rent Controller to expeditiously dispose of a pending leave to defend application in a rent control matter, citing undue delay and prejudice to the petitioner.
Commissioner of Customs v. M/S TANEJA AEROSPACE AND AVIATION LTD
The Delhi High Court held that Customs Authorities can independently verify compliance with exemption conditions but upheld that the aircraft was used for permissible non-scheduled passenger services under the DGCA permit, partly allowing the appeal.
Rajeev Kumar v. Zile Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting necessary amendments to the plaint upon addition of a new defendant under Order 1 Rule 10(4) CPC, while granting the petitioner a fresh opportunity to file an amended written statement.
Darshan Singh Namdhari v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under Section 420 IPC, holding that criminal proceedings are not for recovery of dues and substantial custody served favors bail despite breach of settlement undertakings.
Sanjay Kumar Sain v. State of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court expunged adverse judicial remarks and set aside bailable warrants against a police officer, emphasizing judicial restraint in criticizing police for delays caused by independent forensic agencies.
Commissioner of Customs v. M/S RELIANCE COMMERCIAL DEALERS LTD
The High Court held that Customs Authorities can independently examine compliance with exemption notification conditions, and use of aircraft for non-scheduled passenger services for remuneration satisfies such conditions even without tariff publication or ticket issuance.