Delhi High Court
29,725 judgments
PUMA SE v. ASHOK KUMAR TRADING AS EXPOSURE STYLE
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit based on a court-mediated settlement wherein the defendant acknowledged the plaintiff's exclusive rights and agreed to cease infringing activities.
Sarita Parwanda v. Gunjan Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a registered sale deed under Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act, dismissing claims of mortgage and forgery, and affirmed Respondent No.1's right to possession of the property.
Sajal Mitra v. The Institution of Engineers (India)
The Delhi High Court held that The Institution of Engineers (India) is a private body not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, and dismissed the petition challenging its election results.
Vipen Kumar Parwanda v. Gunjan Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a registered sale deed and dismissed the appeal challenging the sale transaction, holding that oral evidence cannot vary the terms of a registered document absent proof of fraud or forgery.
Retail Royalty Company & Anr. v. Nirbhay Marg News Broadcast Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to plaintiffs for trademark and copyright infringement against a defendant who failed to appear or defend, applying summary judgment principles.
Sripal v. Smt. Laxmi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that unsubstantiated allegations of illicit relationship do not disentitle a wife from maintenance.
M/S Divine Messengers v. Dr Prerna Diwan
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree for possession against a tenant partnership firm, affirming that clear admissions and valid termination of tenancy justify summary judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC, and that suing some partners without impleading all is valid.
Raman Kakar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the discontinuation of Streptomycin in Category-II TB treatment, holding that policy decisions based on expert recommendations and scientific evidence are beyond judicial interference.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. M/S Financial World (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's refusal to recall its order dismissing the revenue's appeal based on the CBDT circular in force at the time, rejecting retrospective application of a later circular concerning penny stock transactions.
Raj Bala v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR involving property dispute after the parties amicably settled, applying the principle that criminal cases with predominant civil nature can be quashed to prevent injustice.
Chanchal Goel & Anr. v. Alok Malani
The Delhi High Court held that the time limit for filing a written statement under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC is procedural and courts have discretion to condone delay, setting aside the trial court's order closing the right to file the written statement and granting the defendants additional time subject to costs.
Dhruv Chand Pathak v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, and 34 IPC based on a genuine compromise between the parties, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to prevent futile prosecutions.
Renuka Kulkarni v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court set aside DDA's non-speaking lease termination of a Dharamshala for lack of natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh hearing and consideration.
Naresh Guliya @ Naresh Singh v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 509, and 506 IPC based on a bona fide settlement between closely related parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of the criminal process.
CLH Gaseous Fuel Applications Pvt Ltd v. National E Assessment Centre Income Tax Department, New Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to issue a mandatory show-cause notice and provide an opportunity of hearing as required under CBDT Instruction No. 20/2015.
Rishi Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Arora & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Trial Court erred in retaining possession keys from the admitted owner due to unrelated disputes, directing release of possession to the petitioner.
VANEETA IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL E-ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to grant personal hearing, directing a de novo assessment and compliance by the Resolution Professional with statutory notices.
Sh Bhupinder Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354A IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Sh. Nishant Walia & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in such cases.