Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Rajkumar Sav and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow street vendors to vend peacefully within their designated zones in compliance with their vending certificates, without harassment.
Tarun Kumar v. Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Tarun Kumar in a money laundering case under PMLA, holding that sufficient incriminating evidence existed to deny bail under the stringent conditions of Section 45 of the Act.
The Commissioner of Income Tax -4 v. GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s exclusion of certain comparables affected by extraordinary events and functionally dissimilar entities in transfer pricing analysis, dismissing the revenue’s appeal.
B L Kashyap and Sons Ltd v. Emaar India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a judgment debtor cannot avoid cash deposit of a monetary decree by furnishing bank guarantee and that liquidity issues do not justify stay of execution once the Appellate Court is seized of stay applications.
Harpreet Singh @Vansh v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the framing of charges under Section 10 of the POCSO Act, holding no illegality in the Trial Court’s order at the charge framing stage.
Mayank Khatri v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused after investigation completion and chargesheet filing, emphasizing no prejudice to trial and satisfactory jail conduct.
Nishant Singhal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s writ petition directing issuance of a passport with corrected date of birth based on a valid statutory birth certificate, holding that the Passport Authority cannot reject such correction without valid grounds.
Ravinder Kumar v. Sahiba Chhabra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a license does not automatically terminate a lease without proper notice, affirming the tenant's liability to pay rent for the notice period under the lease deed.
Chief Engineer/TSP/NR v. M/S Vishal Nirmiti Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the dismissal of a Section 34 petition for being barred by the 120-day limitation period, reaffirming that no condonation of delay beyond this period is permissible under the Arbitration Act.
Neeraj Kumar @ Neeraj v. The State/Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of abetment to suicide under Section 306 IPC, holding that at the bail stage only prima facie satisfaction is required without delving into merits.
Shiv Bathla v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Article 227 to condone delay in filing the written statement in a commercial suit, setting aside the trial court’s orders and directing the statement to be taken on record subject to costs.
Ankit Bansal v. S Paramjeet Singh Khurana
The High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioner's application to reject the plaint in a suit for recovery and rendition of accounts arising from an unregistered partnership firm, holding that such suits post-dissolution are maintainable under the exception in Section 69(3)(a) of the Indian Partnership Act and that revisional interference is unwarranted absent jurisdictional error.
Rabindra Kumar Saha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the posting order of the petitioner by the Director General Border Roads, ruling that organizational interest and administrative discretion prevail over procedural technicalities and personal preferences.
G Arun v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail in a serious offence case under IPC and POCSO Act after considering the nature of allegations, period of custody, and possibility of witness intimidation, emphasizing judicial discretion and trial court's role.
Sh. Sunil Kumar @ Sharma and Anr v. The State through SHO P.S. Vijay Vihar and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a voluntary amicable settlement and mutual divorce decree.
Deepanshu Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the demolition order for an unauthorized temple on public land, ruling that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate had jurisdiction despite the area’s urban status under section 507(a) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957.
Sukhdeep Singh Chadha v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department
The Delhi High Court set aside an income tax assessment order for failure to consider the assessee's timely reply to a show-cause notice, directing a fresh order after affording a personal hearing.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-11 v. DSC Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment beyond four years requires a recorded allegation of failure to disclose material facts, and mere reference to a search action is insufficient to confer jurisdiction.
Sh. Manujendra Shah v. Commissioner of Income Tax-8 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2011-12 due to non-application of mind by the Assessing Officer and sanctioning authority, holding that reassessment was invalid as the petitioner had computed capital gains based on circle rates and the AO failed to justify the cost of acquisition adjustments.
MHG IP Holdings (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. v. The Registrar of Trade Marks, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the trademark registration application for reconsideration under the honest concurrent use exception, recognizing the appellant's prior global use and reputation of the mark 'TIVOLI'.