Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
M/S DEEP BLUE XPRESS LIMITED v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking participation in a tender after the bid submission deadline, holding no technical glitches occurred on the e-portal and emphasizing strict adherence to tender timelines.
M/S GREENTECH ENVIRON MANAGEMENT PVT LTD v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a writ petition challenging a large contractual penalty, holding that disputed factual issues require civil adjudication rather than writ relief.
Gagan Inder Wadhwa v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of a Scientist Cadre officer as Director (CW&E) in DRDO, affirming the competent authority's broad powers to assign functional posts beyond cadre-specific recruitment rules.
M/S OM ENTERPRISES v. PAWAN KUMAR CHHABRA
The Delhi High Court disposed of appeals against arbitral awards on the basis of a mutually agreed settlement, affirming the binding nature of arbitration awards and court-approved settlements.
XILINX INDIA TECHNOLOGY SERVICES PVT LTD v. THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER ZONE VIII & ANR.
The Delhi High Court held that an Indian subsidiary and its foreign holding company are separate persons under the IGST Act, allowing the petitioner’s refund claim for export of services rejected on the ground of non-distinctness.
Subodh Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax assessment orders due to audio disruption during video conferencing personal hearing, directing a fresh hearing to uphold natural justice.
Manish Khilnaney & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 506, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes after the parties amicably settled their differences and entered into a joint settlement.
Ajay Elangovan v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 354D, and 509 IPC based on an amicable settlement and voluntary withdrawal of the complaint, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to secure the ends of justice.
Rajesh Gupta v. ITO Ward 35(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an income tax reassessment order for AY 2017-18 due to issuance of a Section 148 notice containing an incorrect PAN, holding that reopening without valid notice to the correct assessee is invalid.
Dinesh Dahiya v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the income tax appeal, setting aside the Tribunal's order and remanding the matter for reconsideration of trading losses ignored in additions on unexplained cash deposits.
Devendra Prasad Sinha & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Major General M.S. Ahluwalia v. Tehelka.com and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging a defamation judgment, holding that editorial remarks in transcripts admitted by parties are admissible documents not requiring electronic certification under Section 65B, and that review is not permissible to re-examine merits.
UOP India Private Limited v. PCIT 9 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -9
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter to the Tribunal to reconsider the exclusion of Onward Technologies Limited as a comparable, emphasizing the limited scope of appellate powers under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act.
Manish Kumar v. Office of Principal District and Sessions Judge, HQs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a Show Cause Notice issued for unauthorized absence, holding that such notices are not ordinarily subject to judicial interference at a premature stage.
Ruchir Agrawal v. Public Enterprises Selection Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the preference given to Chartered Accountants over Cost Accountants in CPSE Director (Finance) appointments as a reasonable classification and dismissed the appeal challenging the selection process.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -2 v. Standard Chartered Grindlays Pty Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's factual finding that expenses directly attributable to the Indian business are not subject to Section 44C disallowance, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Dr. S. Jaitley & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed a 75-year-old accused in a sexual offence trial to appear virtually without onerous conditions of physical attendance or repeated medical certificates, balancing fair trial rights with practicalities of age and health.
Mohd. Irshad & Anr. v. Nadeem
The Delhi High Court upheld the natural father's custody rights over his minor son, dismissing the maternal grandparents' guardianship petition but granting limited visitation rights to the father.
Navpreet Singh v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a serious economic offence case after investigation completion and chargesheet filing, emphasizing the primacy of liberty and case-specific bail considerations.
Rajesh Kumari v. Dhiraj & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's denial of custody to the mother, directing supervised visitation and counseling to restore the parent-child bond before deciding on custody.