Delhi High Court

93,877 judgments

Year:

Boom Agro India Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Reserve Bank of India & Anr.

02 Nov 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:8012-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the classification of petitioners' accounts as fraud by RBI for failure to provide an opportunity of hearing, applying the Supreme Court's ruling that natural justice must be read into the RBI's Master Directions on Frauds.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant audi alteram partem natural justice RBI Master Directions on Frauds classification of accounts as fraud

Deepa Chandok v. The Union of India and Ors.

02 Nov 2023 · Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:8016

The Delhi High Court held that the INGRAM portal is a pre-litigation grievance mechanism and dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to seek remedy before the appropriate consumer forum.

consumer petition_dismissed INGRAM portal consumer grievance redressal pre-litigation mechanism writ jurisdiction

Amit Sahni v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

02 Nov 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:8013-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court disposed of petitions seeking enforcement of laws against manual scavenging, directing strict compliance with the Supreme Court's comprehensive directions in Balram Singh v. Union of India.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant manual scavenging PEMSR Act 2013 rehabilitation compensation for sewer deaths

Surender Kumar and Others v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others

02 Nov 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:7951-DB

The Delhi High Court held that contractual Assistant Public Prosecutors are entitled to one-time age relaxation for regular recruitment based on their contractual service as per valid government policy, directing UPSC to consider such relaxation in the selection process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant age relaxation contractual employees Assistant Public Prosecutor recruitment rules

Pankaj Ravjibhai Patel Trading as Rakesh Pharmaceuticals v. SSS Pharmachem Pvt. Ltd.

02 Nov 2023 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:7925-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified that valuation of IPR suits for jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act and for court fees are distinct, overruling directions mandating all IPR suits below Rs. 3 lakhs be tried by commercial courts, and restored the injunction vacated on valuation grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Intellectual Property Rights Commercial Courts Act 2015 specified value valuation of suit

Khandwala Finstock Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

02 Nov 2023 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2023:DHC:7923-DB

Delhi High Court held that gold coins must be classified under CTH 7118 9000 and that executive circulars cannot pre-empt adjudication, directing authorities to decide classification and exemption claims on merits uninfluenced by prior office memoranda.

customs and indirect tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 Classification of goods Gold coins CTH 7114 1910

M/S-Saini Cargo v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. & Anr.

02 Nov 2023 · Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:8080
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld IOCL's blacklisting of the petitioner's entire fleet and forfeiture of security deposit for pilferage of aviation turbine fuel based on the Industrial Transport Discipline Guidelines, emphasizing judicial restraint in administrative contract matters.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Transport Discipline Guidelines blacklisting pilferage duplicate dip rod

Thriving Farm Builders Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Sushil Chaudhary and Anr

02 Nov 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6838
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the court must refer disputes to arbitration if a valid arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, without examining substantive contractual conditions.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act arbitration agreement pre-arbitration conciliation conditions precedent

Prasar Bharati v. Prime Channel Software Communications (P) Ltd. & Anr.

01 Nov 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:7934-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the direction to extend the benefit of a revised penalty policy to Prime Channel on the principle of parity, dismissing Prasar Bharati's appeal against the grant of reduced penalty for drop in TVR.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Article 14 parity revised policy penalty formula

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) – 2 v. M/S Victory Apartments Pvt. Ltd.

01 Nov 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld that proceedings under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act are invalid without incriminating material found during search, dismissing the revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 153C Income Tax Act incriminating material search and seizure Assessing Officer satisfaction

Ashok Kumar Aggarwal v. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-2, New Delhi & Ors.

01 Nov 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:8283-DB

The Delhi High Court held that seized cash prior to 01.06.2013 can be adjusted as advance tax, quashing interest imposed under Sections 234A, 234B, and 234C, and directed refund recalculation accordingly.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 132 Section 132B advance tax

Bhumi Chatter Singh Rachhoya v. Vice Chairman, DDA and Ors.

01 Nov 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:8547

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking enforcement of demolition orders on illegal encroachment for lack of locus standi and held that courts should not interfere with executive compliance of such orders.

administrative petition_dismissed writ of mandamus locus standi demolition order Delhi Development Act 1957

Rishi Sehdev v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

01 Nov 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:8498

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging permissions granted for renovation in a protected heritage area, holding that statutory authorities acted within their powers and no judicial interference was warranted.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act Article 226 mandamus judicial review

Ishwar Chand Saini and Anr. v. Delhi Development Authority

01 Nov 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:8287

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging DDA's demolition of a shop on acquired land, holding that unauthorized occupants without legal title cannot claim relief under Article 226.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Delhi Development Authority encroachment public land

Deco Industries (India) v. JM Financial Assets Reconstruction Company Ltd

01 Nov 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:8210-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that the transaction between Karnataka Bank and JM Financial was an assignment of debt under SARFAESI Act, remanded the matter for fresh consideration, and declined to continue interim relief on remand.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act assignment of debt outright sale equitable mortgage

Anni Shokeen v. Delhi Development Authority

01 Nov 2023 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2023:DHC:8382
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for removal of alleged encroachments on DDA land, holding the petitioner lacked locus standi and no legal right was violated as the land was encroachment free.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant writ of mandamus locus standi illegal encroachment green belt

Nawal Kishor v. Union of India and Anr.

01 Nov 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:7936-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of disability pension, holding that the petitioner failed to establish a causal link between his disability and police service under CCS (EOP) Rules, 1939.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension CCS (EOP) Rules 1939 causal connection government service injury

Krishna & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar & Ors.

01 Nov 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:7946

The Delhi High Court upheld the decree of possession for the entire property, dismissed objections to execution, awarded mesne profits, and directed the judgment debtors to vacate within a stipulated time.

civil petition_dismissed Significant execution of decree section 47 CPC section 151 CPC possession

M/S NTPC LIMITED v. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL DGGI COIMBATORE & ORS.

01 Nov 2023 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2023:DHC:7958-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a service tax demand notice against NTPC Limited and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of a clarificatory circular and relevant judicial precedents.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax capacity charges late payment surcharge show cause notice

Pawan Kumar & Anr. v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

01 Nov 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:8159

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406 and 420 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement civil dispute in criminal case