Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
RKM Powergen Pvt Ltd v. CBI
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging FIR and related orders in coal block allocation cases, holding that only the Supreme Court has jurisdiction under Article 136 to entertain such matters, thereby restricting High Court writ jurisdiction as per binding Supreme Court precedents.
Gurpreet Singh & Ors. v. Protection Officer & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim maintenance of Rs.8,000 per month under the DV Act, emphasizing the husband’s duty to maintain the wife despite his non-disclosure of income and the wife’s inability to earn.
Cancer Aid and Research Foundation v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Rs. 4 crore average annual turnover eligibility condition in the MCD’s mid-day meal scheme tender as a rational policy decision, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge of arbitrariness.
Sh. Rohit Gautam & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A)(1), 509, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
M/S. FIRST GLOBAL STOCK BROKING PVT. LTD. v. TARUN GUPTA
The Delhi High Court upheld arbitral awards holding that trades executed without prior confirmed instructions in a client's trading account are unauthorized, and mere receipt of contract notes does not constitute pre-trade authorization.
Pankaj Mittal v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration due to a defective Show Cause Notice lacking clear reasons, directing restoration of registration and emphasizing the need for intelligible allegations in such notices.
Swati Saista v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking restoration of electricity and prosecution of police, holding that disconnection for non-payment by the housing society is lawful, res judicata bars re-litigation, and no fundamental rights violation occurred.
Nandkishore Subhash Dhekane and Ors. v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking regularization of contractual FCSAs as TGT (Computer Science), holding that long continuous service alone does not entitle regularization and that eligibility criteria prescribed by the employer must be respected.
M/S. PRIME ACCOUNTING SOLUTION THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MS. GURMEET KAUR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a GST cancellation application filed due to turnover below threshold and directed fresh consideration with opportunity to be heard.
R. K. Choudhary v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that entitlement to second time bound promotional scale requires completion of 8 years regular service in the first promotional grade as per Recruitment Rules, allowing the claim of one petitioner who met this criterion and dismissing the other who did not.
Pintu Das v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a domestic help for voyeurism and sexual harassment of a minor, rejecting defence claims of false implication and victim shaming.
Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited v. Sh Mahesh Taneja and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate lacks jurisdiction to entertain third party applications under Section 340 CrPC in Section 14 SARFAESI proceedings, directing such disputes to be resolved before the Debt Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 SARFAESI.
The Patri Association v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court ordered relocation of 22 street vendors displaced by DMRC metro construction to a designated site, holding that only those actually displaced are entitled to relocation without conferring permanent rights.
Vikash Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Delhi Prevention of Defacement of Public Property Act because the complainant and investigating officer were the same person, violating the constitutional right to a fair investigation and trial.
Pooja Gupta & Ors. v. Indian Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging bank recovery proceedings under the DRT Act, emphasizing that statutory remedies before the DRT must be exhausted before seeking High Court intervention.
Canara Bank v. Vineeta Pandey & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that banks are not legally obligated to grant One Time Settlement benefits and no writ can compel such grant, affirming that acceptance of EMIs is at the bank's discretion and only authorized persons can deal with loan repayments.
Anurag Mahajan v. Tumlare Travels Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking to set aside an ex parte decree for recovery, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause for delay and negligence of counsel without evidence does not justify setting aside the judgment.
Zeeshan Haider v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a money laundering case, holding that the stringent twin conditions under Section 45 of PMLA were not satisfied based on prima facie evidence including statements under Section 50 and corroborative material.
Santoshanand @ Kavitender Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a POCSO case after charges were framed, emphasizing the higher threshold for bail, inconsistencies in victim’s statements, and prolonged custody without trial.
Jai Singh v. Lt. Governor & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking clarification that acquisition proceedings were quashed, holding that only those who filed Section 5A objections benefit from the Balak Ram Gupta judgments and that the petitioner failed to disclose prior adverse proceedings.