Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Deepika Singh v. Sandeep Yadav
The Delhi High Court set aside the Family Court's order allowing amendment of a divorce petition to include desertion without meeting the statutory two-year desertion requirement, directing the respondent to file a fresh petition instead.
Uppal Housing Private Limited v. Late Jaswant Singh Arora
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 challenging an NCDRC order for lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
Nirmala Devi & Ors. v. Arun Kumar Singla @ A.K. Singla
The High Court allowed the petition to condone delay in filing the written statement upon payment of costs, setting aside the Trial Court's order removing it from record.
Prem Arora v. Kartar Chand through LR Rajiv Arora & Ors.
The High Court directed the trial court to promptly decide interlocutory applications under Order XII Rule 6 and Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC, rejecting indefinite postponement to ensure expeditious disposal of a long-pending possession suit.
Subhash Chand Jain v. Satish Kumar
The High Court clarified that interim orders dismissing injunction applications are tentative and do not constitute final findings on the merits of the suit.
Mohd. Samar v. Waseem Ahmed & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s request to produce a society’s Registration Certificate and examine a witness in execution proceedings, setting aside the Trial Court’s refusal.
RHC Ventures Limited v. Kitchannagari Sarveshwarsa Reddy
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a petition against an NCDRC order when the cause of action arose in Telangana and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Shiv Sagar Developers and Ors. v. Tilak Nagar Audumbar Cooperative Housing Society
Delhi High Court held it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 227 against NCDRC order when cause of action arose outside Delhi and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Yogesh v. Priya
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's imposition of litigation expenses and adjournment for non-payment in a divorce petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, dismissing the petition challenging these orders.
Union of India v. RCCIVL-LITL (Joint Venture)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the intra court appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the appellant was not denied opportunity to present its case and the award was not vitiated by patent illegality or inconsistency.
Monica Gogia v. M/S RSS Estate LLP & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining defendants from alienating disputed property and blocking plaintiff's access, holding that registered Sale Deeds can be challenged on grounds of fraud and non-payment of consideration.
Rajan Tewari v. Durgesh Kumar Pathak & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the election petition challenging the returned candidate's election for failure to plead material facts showing corrupt practice or material effect on election result, affirming the scope of disclosure obligations under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Kapil Dutt v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a 1992 Will executed by Late Major M.S.N. Dutt and granted Probate to the petitioners, rejecting challenges based on joint family property claims and undue influence.
Hamdard Public School v. Augustine MJ & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of amounts deposited by the appellant pursuant to a consent settlement with Respondent 1, disposing of the appeal without affecting the merits of the case.
SHASHIDHAR v. ASHWINI UMA MATHAD
The Supreme Court modified the partition decree by excluding certain self-acquired properties from ancestral coparcenary partition, confirming shares of parties in other properties.
Shiv Pratap Singh Rana v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr.
The Supreme Court quashed rape and criminal intimidation proceedings against the appellant, holding the relationship was consensual and the prosecution's case lacked sufficient material to proceed to trial.
X v. Y
The Supreme Court upheld divorce on the ground of desertion due to non-compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights and conditioned its operation on payment of Rs. 30 lakhs as lump sum alimony.
Thatireddigari Maheswara Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder based on reliable eyewitness testimony of the deceased's relatives corroborated by material evidence, dismissing the appeal.
Vishwanatha v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to doubts over his identification in the absence of a Test Identification Parade and inconsistencies between eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.
R. RADHAKRISHNA PRASAD v. SWAMINATHAN & ANR.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reduction of refundable advance consideration to Rs. 3,00,000/- due to lack of proof for additional payments in a suit for specific performance.