Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S SHIVOY ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF CGST, DELHI NORTH AND ORS
The Delhi High Court directed verification of the petitioner’s additional place of business and restoration of GST registration if found operational, emphasizing that cancellation solely for non-existence at the principal place is unjustified.
Neeraj Dengre @ Neeraj Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of cheating and forgery due to failure to cooperate with investigation despite initial compliance.
Dr Utkarsh Pathak v. Dr Sreenivas Madireddy
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and the suit could not be summarily rejected.
Jyoti Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of serious fraud and forgery due to failure to cooperate with investigation despite notices under Section 41A CrPC.
M/S SHRI SAI METALS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX WEST DELHI
The Delhi High Court directed the GST authorities to decide the petitioner's application for cancellation of GST registration within 30 days, clarifying that cancellation does not absolve prior tax liabilities.
Kanchaman Yonjan v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused under the NDPS Act despite recovery of commercial quantity of narcotics, emphasizing delay in trial, procedural safeguards under Section 50, and absence of independent witnesses as grounds overriding statutory bail embargo.
Olive Traders v. The Commissioner, CGST and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the cancellation of GST registration for lack of independent verification and fair opportunity, directing the petitioner be allowed to respond to the Show Cause Notice on merits.
Sukhvinder Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to absence of independent witnesses and prolonged trial delay, emphasizing that procedural irregularities do not automatically justify bail but trial delay can override statutory bail restrictions.
Sovraj v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a foreign national accused under the NDPS Act, emphasizing that procedural irregularities in sampling and absence of independent witnesses, coupled with prolonged trial delay, justify bail despite stringent statutory conditions.
Madhuri Chauhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, emphasizing the impact of procedural irregularities and prolonged trial delay on the right to liberty despite statutory bail restrictions.
Jasbir Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that disclosure statements under Section 67 NDPS Act are inadmissible without corroboration and that delay in trial justifies bail despite the bar under Section 37.
Sahib Textiles Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 206, Zone 11, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order under Section 73 CGST Act for failure to consider the petitioner’s submissions and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication with an opportunity of hearing.
M/S Balaji Rubber Industries and Ors. v. M/S Green Rubber India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to condone delay and directed the appellants to remove procedural defects and file the written statement with costs imposed on them.
Shri Parmod Bahl v. Registrar, Cooperative Societies and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar Cooperative Societies to decide the petitioner’s pending representation for plot allotment by a reasoned order within four weeks, without adjudicating on the substantive merits.
IDBI Bank Ltd v. SH Lagadapati Madhusudhan Rao & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that granting a personal hearing before classifying accounts as fraudulent under RBI Master Directions is discretionary, not mandatory, and the bank must provide reasons if it rejects such a request.
Shabnam Burney v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed removal of unauthorized constructions on the Yamuna river bank and appointed the DDA Vice Chairman as nodal officer to coordinate enforcement and prevent future encroachments.
DR B. R. AMBEDKAR INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCE AND HOSPITAL v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Central Government’s withdrawal of recognition of a dental college based on expert recommendations, emphasizing judicial deference to expert authorities and procedural fairness in mala fide allegations.
Mohd. Mintoo v. The State GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that statutory bail restrictions do not bar bail on grounds of trial delay and absence of independent witnesses, and that Section 50 NDPS Act does not apply to vehicle searches.
Bantu v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that omission of the word 'nearest' in Section 50 notice does not vitiate the search, Section 50 is inapplicable to recovery from a bag, and procedural irregularities like non-joinder of independent witnesses and absence of videography do not entitle bail but require trial scrutiny.
Jagir Kaur v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that CGHS beneficiaries are entitled to full reimbursement of emergency Covid-19 treatment expenses at non-empanelled hospitals, affirming the right to health under Article 21 and setting aside retrospective application of reimbursement caps.