Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Sonu
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing a remedical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for appointment as a Delhi Police Constable, dismissing the petition challenging this direction.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Monu Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for police constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Ankush
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess tattoo presence on candidates' right forearms in Delhi Police recruitment, dismissing the Staff Selection Commission's challenge.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. KM Lalita
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in Delhi Police under tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Shivam Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the candidate's fitness regarding a tattoo restriction in Delhi Police recruitment.
Divakar Upadhyaya v. Amit Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a Medical Board including a dermatologist to verify the absence of tattoos on the candidate's right forearm as per recruitment rules for Delhi Police Constable.
Staff Selection Commission v. Deepak Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a dermatological re-medical examination to determine the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in light of tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission v. KM Sonika
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tribunal's direction for re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the candidate's fitness and compliance with the tattoo clause for Delhi Police Constable recruitment.
Vedansh Anand v. Dharam Singh Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Rocky Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including dermatologist assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Rohit Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist's assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for police recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Upendra Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s direction for a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to verify the absence of a tattoo on the right forearm as a valid recruitment condition for the post of Constable in Delhi Police.
GNCT OF DELHI v. RAHUL
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including dermatological assessment to verify the absence of a tattoo on the right forearm as per recruitment rules for Delhi Police Constable.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SACHIN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment under tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission v. Sanjay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination including a dermatologist's assessment to determine the presence of a tattoo on the candidate's right forearm as per recruitment rules, dismissing the petition challenging this direction.
Staff Selection Commission v. Amit Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for a re-medical examination including a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for police recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission v. Atul Baghel
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police recruitment in compliance with tattoo restrictions.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Amit Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the CAT's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for appointment as Constable in the Delhi Police in light of a tattoo restriction.
Chairman, National Highways Authority of India v. Arvind Kumar Thakur
The Supreme Court allowed NHAI's appeal, holding that toll collection on a partially completed highway section under BOT contract is lawful and toll amounts collected need not be refunded.
SHRI GURUDATTA SUGARS MARKETING PVT. LTD. v. PRITHVIRAJ SAYAJIRAO DESHMUKH
The Supreme Court held that authorized signatories of a company are not 'drawers' under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act and cannot be directed to pay interim compensation, limiting such liability to the drawer company alone.