Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mohit Gupta v. Ved Prakash Kathuria
The Delhi High Court cancelled non-bailable warrants issued against a Judgment Debtor in execution proceedings due to medical incapacity and assurance of future appearance, subject to compliance with court directions.
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited & Anr. v. Krishnaben Dipesh Gol & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the well-known trademark 'AMUL' is entitled to protection across classes and directed cancellation of the respondent's identical mark registered in Class-06 for infringement and passing off.
MGB FINLEASE PVT LTD v. KANWALJEET SINGH
The Delhi High Court refused to initiate contempt proceedings for non-compliance with a decree, emphasizing that contempt jurisdiction must be exercised sparingly and alternative execution remedies should be pursued first.
Shergil v. M/S VRC Constructions India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file replication despite prior closure of the right, imposing costs to balance procedural fairness.
Mr. Manish and Ms. Seema Singh v. Saroj Jain
The court dismissed the tenant's petition seeking amendment of the written statement to reflect subsequent developments and upheld the admission of a Sale Deed placed on record by the landlady, holding that such amendments were unnecessary and procedural irregularities did not invalidate relevant evidence.
Vir Pal v. Vijay Kumar Farshwal and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order against a tenant who failed to defend the petition and dismissed his subsequent frivolous applications challenging ownership and alleging fraud.
AMR INDIA LTD v. NBCC INDIA LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a bidder for failing to submit fresh Bank Solvency Certificates after revision of estimated costs in a tender, emphasizing strict compliance with tender conditions and limited judicial interference.
SD Windlesh v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs expeditious action by DDA to remove illegal encroachments on Yamuna floodplains and mandates protection of cleared areas to prevent future encroachments.
Shiva Build Tech Private Limited v. Northern Railway & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-speaking tender rejection order that forfeited earnest money and banned business without issuing a show cause notice, emphasizing the necessity of reasons and fair hearing in administrative actions.
Vishal Choudhary v. SNPC Machines Private Limited & Ors
The Delhi High Court modified an interim injunction in a patent infringement suit to permit the appellant to sell eight already manufactured brick making machines pending appeal, subject to safeguards protecting the respondents' interests.
SHRI HARISH BAJAJ v. SHRI YOGI BAJAJ & ORS.
The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful compromise partitioning the suit property and allowed refund of Court fees following an early settlement under CPC and Court Fees Act provisions.
M S Paramount Premier Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Neeraj Grover & Anr.
Limitation for filing a Section 34 petition against an arbitral award runs from the date of disposal of any Section 33 application, regardless of whether the application was allowed or dismissed.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH DIRECTORATE OF FAMILY WELFARE v. NISHA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Government's appeal and upheld the Industrial Tribunal's order directing regularization of long-term contractual ANMs engaged under the RCH project, emphasizing protection against indefinite contractual exploitation.
Abdul Mir Khalick v. Oriflame India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that courts must exercise discretion cautiously under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and not pass judgment solely on non-filing of written statement without considering disputed facts or evidence, and set aside a decree granting pre-suit interest without legal basis.
Purshottam Lal Tandon v. M/S City Super Market & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that when an amendment causes a suit to exceed the Court's pecuniary jurisdiction, the suit should be transferred under Section 24(5) CPC rather than plaint returned, to avoid de novo proceedings and further justice.
Grandeur Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Gramin Vikas Trust
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal by six months under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with no objection from the respondent.
Mineral Area Development Authority v. M/S Steel Authority of India
The Supreme Court held that royalty under the MMDR Act is not a tax and that the Act limits State powers to tax mineral rights, clarifying the constitutional division of legislative powers over mineral taxation.
Manharan Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to the prosecution's failure to prove his presence at the relevant time and held that the burden under Section 106 Evidence Act cannot be shifted without cogent evidence.
Meshar Jahan & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that serious offences like rape require trial despite matrimonial disputes and possible settlements.
PIO, RP CELL, SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's award of Rs. 50,000 compensation against SDMC for wilful denial of RTI information regarding unauthorized parking charges, affirming the Commission's broad remedial powers under Section 19(8)(b) of the RTI Act.