Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Irwin Edmund Sequeira & Ors. v. Sale Proceeds of MV Karnika
The Bombay High Court allowed a mortgagee's intervention in an Admiralty suit under Rule 1086, holding that intervention depends solely on interest in the vessel or sale proceeds and that scope of defences is to be adjudicated at trial.
Rahul Vattamparambil Remesh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially waived warehousing charges by 50% under Section 151 CPC due to unexplained delay in seeking full waiver, modifying its earlier order.
Tushar Bansal & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
M/S J.K. Enterprises v. Superintendent, Delhi North, Ward-24, Zone-1, Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a consolidated SCN for multiple years, confirmed proper service of notices, rejected writ jurisdiction in a fraudulent ITC case, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Mohd. Guddu v. Ganga Devi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and possession decree in a commercial tenancy dispute, modifying the decree to allow continued occupation till June 2026 with payment of arrears, while remanding disputed issues for trial.
Pranij Heights India Pvt Ltd v. The Joint Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that non-communication of an extension order under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act does not vitiate adjudication proceedings and dismissed the writ petition challenging delayed adjudication of a Show Cause Notice.
Manikjeet Singh Kals v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction for adjudication and appeal under the CGST Act is determined by the highest tax demand and procedural objections do not invalidate orders, directing the petitioner to pursue remedy through appeal.
Neelmani Electricals v. The Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, and left open the validity of impugned GST notifications pending the Supreme Court's decision.
CDL Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Vijay Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
Rajesh & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of one appellant for causing grievous injuries under Section 308 IPC while acquitting another due to delayed implication, and modified the sentence of the convicted appellant to the period already served.
GALAX INFRA AND SPORTS v. TUNA ENVIROTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement without delving into arbitrability or merits.
Anil v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction under Section 307 IPC to Section 323 IPC due to lack of intention to cause death, while upholding other convictions and reducing the sentence to the period already served.
Axis Finance Limited v. Saurav Shekhar Sinha
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly.
Krishna Murari Bangar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal charges against a government servant alleging conspiracy to manipulate investigations, holding that judicially upheld Scheduled Tribe status and accepted closure reports preclude prosecution without sanction and material evidence.
Laxmi Rawat v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that absence of documentary proof and complainant's status as housewife do not rebut statutory presumption without credible evidence.
Union of India v. Satya Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction mandating grant of revised pay scales to eligible library staff without awaiting notification of amended Recruitment Rules, dismissing the petition challenging such implementation.
M/S CONVEY TECH PROJECTS v. M/S H.P TRADING COMPANY
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but modified the sentence by imposing a higher fine and reducing imprisonment, considering the accused's age and cheque amount.
Kedar Parsad Meena & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal case under Section 392 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the inherent power of the court to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Gagan Rathor and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial dispute based on amicable settlement and divorce decree, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.