Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S PIHU ENTERPRISES v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND TAXES GNCTD
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration cannot be withheld solely due to pending assessment or recovery proceedings and directed the tax authorities to process the petitioner’s cancellation application accordingly.
Satish Chand Mittal v. Sales Tax Officer SGST, Ward 25- Zone 1
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order for failure to properly serve the Show Cause Notice and denied the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, directing a fresh adjudication.
Sangeeta Bakshi & Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for alternate vending site allotment due to delay and non-compliance, directing petitioners to seek fresh licenses under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Rebanta Healthcare Pvt Ltd v. Dr Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte injunction against the appellant's use of the trademark 'REBAHEAL', recognizing prior user rights and directing mediation and merits hearing.
M/S Kundan Trading Company v. Pr. Commissioner of Department of Trade & Taxes, Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to process the petitioner's GST registration cancellation application without withholding it due to pending proceedings, clarifying that cancellation does not absolve prior liabilities.
Akash Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the petitioner failed to rebut the presumption of debt and financial capacity of the complainant, and dismissed the revision petition.
Anant Rao v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that admitted cheque signatures raise statutory presumptions which the accused must rebut with evidence, and that service of demand notice by registered post and electronic means is valid.
Staff Selection Commission v. Ajay Khatri
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order allowing a candidate with a non-visible tattoo to join training, holding that invisible tattoos cannot justify medical rejection in recruitment.
Divine Infracon Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle -18, New Delhi
Reopening of income tax assessment cannot be based solely on the DVO report without the Assessing Officer applying independent mind and forming a bona fide reason to believe escapement of income.
KGPS Mechanical Pvt Ltd v. Cinda Engineering and Construction Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute arbitrator to continue arbitration proceedings after the original arbitrator recused himself, directing the arbitration to proceed under DIAC rules from the existing stage.
Tilak Raj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an employee who voluntarily refuses mandatory pre-promotional training cannot claim ACP benefits linked to promotion, dismissing the writ petition seeking such benefit.
Chander Kanta v. Gyanesh Bharti Commissioner MCD and Others
The Delhi High Court allowed the respondent to self-demolish unauthorized construction and apply for fresh building plan sanction despite a contempt petition, emphasizing that property disputes must be resolved in civil proceedings.
Sh. Sudhanshu Jaggi & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld interim maintenance granted under the DV Act based on prima facie domestic violence and reasonable income assessment, dismissing the petition challenging the order.
State v. Sarjeet
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against the acquittal in a POCSO case, holding that the victim's contradictory testimony and lack of proof of minority justified the acquittal.
Anita v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, affirming that the petitioner failed to rebut the statutory presumption of debt liability arising from admitted cheque signatures.
Sindhu Devi v. State of Govt of NCT & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of a minor child, holding that the child was voluntarily left with the in-laws and police investigation found no unlawful custody.
Naraindas v. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging an NCDRC order, holding that jurisdiction lies with the High Court where the cause of action arose.
Bharat Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition seeking production of an adult woman who voluntarily left her matrimonial home and did not wish to return.
Pranay Jain v. Shiv Kumar Gandhi
The Delhi High Court reduced the cost imposed on the defendant for delay in re-filing the written statement in a commercial suit, allowing the petition and directing payment and deposit of the moderated cost.
Sudesh Chhikara v. Baljeet Singh
The High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application for production of original documents not in the respondent's possession, allowing adverse inference and secondary evidence as appropriate remedies.