Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sherwood Officers Society v. Sh. Kamaljit Singh & Anr.
Delhi High Court held it lacked jurisdiction over a consumer dispute petition arising in Punjab, allowing withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Anju Bala v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes lacks jurisdiction to issue binding directions like FIR registration, affirming its recommendatory role under Article 338 and dismissed the appellant's delayed appeal.
The Jagjiwan Coop Group Housing Society Ltd v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the execution order substituting a member's name in cooperative society records, holding the execution petition was filed within limitation and dismissing the petitioner's challenges as meritless.
Sanjay Malik v. Neeru Malik
The Delhi High Court granted one final opportunity to the objector to cross-examine a crucial witness in a probate petition, subject to payment of costs, to prevent serious prejudice while upholding procedural fairness.
Amarjeet Singh @ Pummy v. M/S Jaina Properties Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court deferred coercive execution proceedings for one week to allow the petitioner to file an appeal against a mandatory injunction decree.
M/S ANGLIAN FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S ELECTREV MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to reconsider the petitioner’s request to prove documents already on record through an additional witness after hearing both parties.
Ms. Shruti Shukla and Ms. Harpreet Kaur v. Priyanka Luthra
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking direction for expeditious disposal of a divorce case, holding that no special reason existed to invoke its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227.
Akash Tanwar v. State of Delhi
Delhi High Court granted transit bail to the applicant arrested for a social media post offence, held Nagaland as proper jurisdiction, and declined to quash the FIR under the SC/ST Act for lack of prima facie case.
Vikas Chhillar & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIRs under minor IPC offences on the basis of amicable settlement between parties, applying Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process and directed restorative measures instead of costs.
Mohammad Shabaz & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement between the parties.
Vijay Kumar Jain & Ors. v. Arun Mehra Proprietor of M/S Saree Ghar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's grant of Leave to Defend in a suit for recovery based on admitted signed cheques and promissory notes, holding that triable issues regarding loan disbursement and misuse of blank instruments warranted contesting the suit.
Dr Brajesh Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal and Anr
The court held that the punishment period for forfeiture of promotion must be counted from the due date of promotion, directing promotion with seniority from that date despite the punishment order being issued later.
IIDL (IFCI Infrastructure Development Ltd) v. M/S Subir Engineering Works (P) Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on VAT liability, holding that judicial interference under Section 37 is limited and specific LOIs supersede general tender terms.
Smt. Murti v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim for CSD and Health Card facilities and pass a reasoned order, granting liberty to challenge the decision.
Vipul Bansal & Ors. v. State Through SHO Vijay Vihar & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Ravi Shukla & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 509, 354, 354A, and 34 IPC based on amicable settlement between neighbors, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 of BNSS.
Amarjit Singh v. Punjab & Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court held that only the Competent Authority under Pension Regulations can initiate disciplinary proceedings and impose penalties on retired bank officers, quashing a charge sheet issued by an incompetent authority and setting aside the consequent penalty of withholding pension.
Devendra Khatik v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354 and related IPC provisions following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.
Pradeep Kumar v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing a fresh medical examination for a recruitment candidate declared unfit due to inconsistent chest expansion measurements taken while ill, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to medical standards.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. DHARMENDER SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under a Credit Facility Agreement, affirming that a valid arbitration clause mandates such appointment despite non-response by respondents.