Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Yogesh Kumar Goel & Anr. v. Saurabh Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition, holding that the suit was filed within the extended limitation period granted due to COVID-19, setting aside orders dismissing the suit on limitation grounds.
Commissioner CGST Delhi South v. Air India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the extended limitation period under Section 73(1) Finance Act, 1994 cannot be invoked without specific allegations of deliberate suppression of facts or fraud in the Show Cause Notice.
STIC Travels Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a 14-year delay in adjudicating a service tax Show Cause Notice renders the proceedings barred by limitation and quashed the re-initiation notice issued in 2023.
Surender Kumar Badhwar v. Abhay Pratap Singh Raghuwanshi
The High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the trial court's order rejecting a decree on admissions in an ejectment suit due to absence of clear admissions and presence of disputed factual defenses.
Manoj Arora v. Shri Jatinder Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that court fee assessment depends on the relief granted and cannot be contested at the preliminary stage.
Kamal Mahajan & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Anand Singh Panwar and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed retrospective grant of replacement pay scale benefits from 01.01.1996 to similarly placed CAPF personnel, following earlier judicial precedents, subject to limitation on arrears.
Harish Chand & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
VIDYASAGAR PRASAD v. UCO BANK
The Supreme Court upheld the initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor, holding that statutory balance sheet entries and a One Time Settlement proposal constitute valid acknowledgment of debt extending the limitation period under Section 18 of the Limitation Act as applied to IBC proceedings.
HDFC BANK LTD. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against HDFC Bank and its officials for alleged violation of Income Tax Act restraining orders, holding that the FIR did not disclose prima facie offences under the IPC and continuation of proceedings would cause undue hardship.
Uma & Anr. v. The State Rep. by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence, medical proof of homicidal death, and failure to explain circumstances under Section 106 of the Evidence Act.
V. D. RAVEESHA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for criminal breach of trust and cheating where the accused forged documents to sell a hypothecated vehicle without repaying the loan, clarifying the distinction and coexistence of offences under Sections 406 and 420 IPC.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Pune v. Dr. Kasliwal Medical Care & Research Foundation
The Bombay High Court held that non-disposal of a registration application under Section 12AA(2) within six months does not result in deemed registration, overruling the Tribunal's order and following the later Supreme Court precedent.
Praveen Kumar Passi v. Pradip Syamlal Das
The Competent Authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act has implied powers to sell attached goods to fully execute eviction orders, and partial delivery of possession does not amount to complete execution.
Shivaji Damodar Karne v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court acquitted a bus driver of rash and negligent driving causing death due to lack of evidence and failure to consider contributory negligence, setting aside earlier convictions.
The People’s Education Society v. Dr. K. Sudhakar Reddy
The High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order setting aside the compulsory retirement of an associate professor, holding that the purported Chairman of the trust lacked authority due to rejected Change Reports, and that disciplinary action without competent authority violated natural justice.
Hemant Bharat Kachare v. Vasu Anna Shetty & Ors.
The High Court held that tenant's unauthorized permanent constructions in rented premises justified eviction under Section 13(1)(b) of the Bombay Rent Act, setting aside the appellate court's reversal of eviction.
Aspandiar Rashid Irani & Ors. v. Pasayadan Cooperative Housing Society Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that recovery of cooperative housing society dues under Section 154B-29 is not barred by limitation and applies to persons in possession regardless of membership or registered sale agreement.
Vikash @ Vicky v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged with commercial quantity narcotics offences under the NDPS Act due to prolonged pre-trial custody and procedural lapses, emphasizing that statutory bail restrictions do not bar bail where trial delay violates fundamental rights.
Neeraj Mittal v. Subhash Sachdeva & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of the State Consumer Commission to procure records from the District Forum to facilitate hearing of a seven-year pending appeal, without imposing a strict timeline for disposal.