Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Navneet v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a candidate's appointment for failing to meet the mandatory educational qualification of studying Physics as prescribed in the recruitment advertisement for TGT (Maths).
Shaloo Gupta & Ors. v. Neeraj Khanna & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a tenancy dispute on the basis of an amicable settlement whereby the tenants agreed to vacate the premises by a specified date and comply with payment and maintenance obligations.
Josh Media Vision Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Information Broadcasting & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to decide the petitioners' representation by a speaking order after personal hearing, keeping impugned orders in abeyance pending final decision.
Sachin Asthana v. Adnan Azam
The Delhi High Court dismissed a revision petition challenging an eviction order as infructuous after the landlord lawfully recovered possession through execution proceedings.
Suresh Chandra Gupta v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition seeking release of seized goods, holding that factual disputes over seizure and custody require separate legal proceedings and contempt is not the appropriate remedy.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SURESH KASHYAP & ANR
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment default disputes arising from a Credit Facility Agreement.
M/S ONCQUEST LABORATORIES LTD. v. M/S SDACC HEALTHCARE PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator upon finding a prima facie arbitration agreement and proper service, limiting its role to existence of the agreement without delving into merits.
Jagdish v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that limitation for filing a petition under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act begins only after apportionment of compensation under Sections 30 and 31, allowing the appeal and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.
Kumar Karan v. Usha Rani Sharma
A revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous and is liable to be dismissed once possession of the premises is legally restored to the landlord through execution proceedings.
Sudershan Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the bona fide requirement for possession to establish a modern dental clinic was proved and the trial court's dismissal was perverse.
Balram @ Ballu v. Sanjay & Anr
The High Court held that the offending vehicle was driven rashly and negligently despite the injured's suicidal attempt, setting aside the Tribunal's award and remanding for compensation determination.
M/S B.E. BILLIMORIA AND COMPANY LIMITED v. ASHOK KHANNA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a 330-day delay in filing a revision petition due to unsatisfactory explanations and inconsistent reasons for the delay.
Divya Bhaskar and Anr. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that B.Ed. is not an essential qualification for Assistant Teacher posts under applicable Recruitment Rules and validated appointments made pursuant to a corrigendum excluding B.Ed. candidates, quashing the DoE's order declaring such appointments null and void.
KAD HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 6 DELHI
The Delhi High Court held that reopening a tax assessment for AY 2015-16 beyond the ten-year limitation period prescribed under pre-amendment law is invalid, quashing the notice issued under Section 148.
The Commissioner of Income Tax v. Zebra Technologies Asia Pacific Pet. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee must be given an opportunity to rebut treaty shopping allegations before invoking Section 263 to revise an assessment order.
ACROPOLIS REALTY PVT. LTD v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1-1, DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act is deemed issued only upon dispatch, and reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the three-year limitation period without valid extension are invalid.
Saddeekan Begum v. Bharati Axa General Insurance Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal holding that rash and negligent driving was proved by credible eyewitness and medical evidence, setting aside the Tribunal's conversion of the claim to Section 163A and remanding for fresh compensation determination under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988.
Ram Babu Mahto v. Bank of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging Bank of India's policy denying subsidised accommodation to officers transferred on their own request, holding that acceptance of transfer conditions precludes entitlement to such benefits.
Ashok Kumar Yadav and Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs autonomous MAIDS to grant contractual nursing staff pay fixation and allowances from November 2012 as per departmental order, affirming equal pay and rejecting unjustified delay.
Krishan Yad Gaur v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder and arms offences, holding that prima facie serious allegations and the gravity of the offence preclude bail at this stage.