Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Huges Real Estate Developers LLP v. Khernagar Adarsh Co-operative Housing Society Limited
The Bombay High Court dismissed the developer's appeal for injunction restraining redevelopment, held no concluded contract on revised terms, set aside NOC condition for new developer, and directed monetary deposit to protect developer's rights while allowing redevelopment to proceed.
IMAX Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a final limitation order attained after Supreme Court dismissal of appeals operates as res judicata, allowing enforcement of foreign arbitral awards against E-City but not related companies, and clarified public policy and impleadment principles under the Arbitration Act.
Shiv Enterprises v. Amit Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing a plaintiff to place an additional email document on record after delay, emphasizing a lenient approach under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC to ensure substantial justice.
Ritu Pahwa v. Payal Kashyap & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to place on record late-obtained documents relevant to a construction dispute and directed expeditious hearing of the injunction application, emphasizing judicial fairness over procedural delay.
Ram Singh v. Tej Bahadur Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s rejection of condonation of delay application for filing written statement, holding that vague hospitalization and financial difficulties do not constitute sufficient cause.
Pankaj Kumar Tiwari v. Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to accused in a large-scale money laundering case under PMLA, emphasizing the primacy of the right to speedy trial and liberty over stringent statutory bail conditions amid prolonged trial delays.
Chanchal Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increment in light of Supreme Court rulings and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.
Narmeta Manoj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing a fresh Physical Endurance Test for a CISF constable who was compelled to appear while injured, emphasizing compassionate consideration of medical conditions in recruitment.
M/S New Horizons Asphalt Private Limited v. The Chief Commissioner of Custom and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing release of detained imported rubber process oil due to procedural lapses in communicating hazardous waste test reports and non-compliance with statutory requirements.
BT GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
The Delhi High Court held that an assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act cannot be recharacterized as a draft order under Section 144C based on erroneous headings or order numbers, dismissing the petitioner's challenge accordingly.
Kanwar Enterprises Pvt Ltd v. Jaswinder Singh Bhatia
The High Court allowed the defendant's petition to summon a GST official to produce records on input tax credit, directing the Trial Court to rehear arguments after recording such evidence.
Rathod Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. George M. Cherian
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arose and allowed the petitioners to withdraw their petition to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court.
Kusum Jain v. Suresh Chand Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of a decree on admitted claim under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, holding that contested adverse possession negates any admission by the defendant.
Pawan Kumar Garg & Anr v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal challenging refusal of interim relief against a bank's fraud declaration, holding such interlocutory orders are generally not appealable and must comply with due process.
Union of India v. Hemraj Singh
The High Court allowed the Union of India to withdraw their writ petition challenging the CAT judgment to pursue a review before the Tribunal.
Vivek Kumar Saxena v. M/S College Book Store
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s refusal to allow a delayed written statement and dismissed the petition challenging ex-parte proceedings in a commercial suit, emphasizing strict adherence to statutory timelines.
Suman Kumari & Ors. v. National Ins Co Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claimants' appeal, holding that rash and negligent driving by the crane vehicle caused the fatal accident and remanded the matter for quantification of compensation.
Randhir Singh and Others v. Union of India and Another
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation for agricultural land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act by treating it as semi-urban land with potentiality, relying on adjoining urbanized land rates and statutory principles.
Council of Architecture v. AR Bela Agrawal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of a suspension order against an architect consultant, emphasizing procedural fairness and limiting the regulatory body's jurisdiction in contractual disputes.
Rahul Nath v. Registrar of Firms and Societies and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 is not maintainable for disputes involving contested facts and pending civil suits, and declined interim relief against gate pass charges levied by a society.