Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
CLEAVE CONSULTING NETWORK PRIVATE LIMITED v. ROZANA SUPERMART
Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve lease-related disputes between parties, directing settlement efforts and compliance with procedural safeguards.
Abhishek and Purnima Vashishtha v. Bureau of Indian Standards
The Delhi High Court held that BIS cannot enforce Service Bonds against employees resigning to join another government-owned enterprise and directed refund of Bond amounts and withheld salaries.
Raj Kumar Raghav v. The District and Sessions Judge, Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recalled its earlier order, restored the writ petition, and allowed the petitioner to approach the Additional District Magistrate for adjudication while granting interim protection against coercive action.
Satpal Kalra & Anr v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging cheating and dishonoured cheques, holding that registration of FIR is not barred by withdrawal of a similar complaint and that the FIR discloses cognizable offences warranting trial.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Sachin Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a Medical Board including a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo-related disqualification criteria.
M/S Ravindra Nath v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's cancellation of a tender despite a single valid bidder, affirming the authority's discretion to ensure competitive bidding and public interest.
Sh. Ajit Singh v. Smt. Adarsh Kaur Gill & Ors.
The court held that a suit for partial partition is maintainable under exceptions, recognized subrogation rights on mortgage redemption without exclusive possession, and accepted the sham nature of the lease deed, allowing the suit to proceed on restricted claims.
Iqbal Singh and Ors. v. Dr A K Gupta
A tenant who voluntarily agrees to and acts upon a rent escalation cannot later retract on statutory grounds limiting unilateral rent increases under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.
Ratul Puri v. Bank of Baroda
The Delhi High Court quashed the Bank of Baroda's classification of Ratul Puri as a fraudulent borrower for failure to provide natural justice, directing removal of his name from the Central Fraud Registry.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Harish Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination including dermatologist assessment to determine the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable appointment in light of tattoo restrictions.
Uday Kaushish v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that the DDA is bound by the 1931 lease deed terms mandating renewal rights and cannot treat the property as Nazul land without proper notification, thereby quashing the DDA's refusal to renew the lease and convert it to freehold.
Khyali Ram and Ors. v. GNCTD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order rejecting interim relief for contractual employees terminated under a Cabinet resolution, remanding the matter for fresh consideration after proper examination of contract terms and legal principles.
Om Rathod v. Director General of Health Services
The Supreme Court held that persons with disabilities must be assessed for medical course eligibility based on functional competence with reasonable accommodations, not merely on quantified disability, affirming their constitutional right to equality and inclusion.
Neeraj Sud v. Jaswinder Singh
The Supreme Court held that mere deterioration of a patient's condition post-surgery does not establish medical negligence absent proof of breach of duty or lack of skill, setting aside the compensation awarded by the NCDRC.
Ramratan @ Ramswaroop v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court held that bail conditions must be reasonable and related to securing the accused's presence, setting aside High Court conditions that interfered with civil property rights and exceeded bail jurisdiction.
The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramjan Khan & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable ocular evidence and material contradictions, emphasizing that acquittal after proper appreciation of evidence should not be disturbed absent perversity.
Ratna Chandrakant Vannam v. Tukaram K. Jadhav
The Bombay High Court held the arrest under Maharashtra Police Act unlawful, quashed the case, and awarded compensation for illegal detention and police misconduct.
Huges Real Estate Developers LLP v. Khernagar Adarsh Co-operative Housing Society Limited
The Bombay High Court dismissed the developer's appeal for injunction restraining redevelopment, held no concluded contract on revised terms, set aside NOC condition for new developer, and directed monetary deposit to protect developer's rights while allowing redevelopment to proceed.
IMAX Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Limited & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a final limitation order attained after Supreme Court dismissal of appeals operates as res judicata, allowing enforcement of foreign arbitral awards against E-City but not related companies, and clarified public policy and impleadment principles under the Arbitration Act.
Shiv Enterprises v. Amit Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing a plaintiff to place an additional email document on record after delay, emphasizing a lenient approach under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC to ensure substantial justice.