Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hari Om Sharma v. Sauman Kumar Chatterjee & Anr.
Delhi High Court upheld arbitration awards resolving partnership disputes, holding that unregistered firms' disputes are arbitrable despite Section 69 bar on civil suits, and affirmed limitation and interest rulings.
Manmohan Singh Kohli v. Amarjit Singh Kohli & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Gift Deed and Will, dismissed the plaintiff's claim for partition of alleged joint family properties, holding the properties to be self-acquired and owned exclusively by defendant No.1.
Korra Worldwide Advertising Pvt Ltd v. HT Digital Streams Limited
The Delhi High Court held that procedural defects in a written statement, including absence of signatures on each page and improper verification, are curable and allowed the rectified written statement to be taken on record with costs.
Kanhiya Lal Prakesh Kumar v. AJM Housing Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the actual use of immovable property exclusively in trade or commerce determines the commercial nature of a dispute under the Commercial Courts Act, dismissing the petition challenging jurisdiction.
Lemon Seeds Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an MPID Act auction sale, holding that explicit caution clauses and statutory procedures preclude refund claims despite non-availability of title documents.
Ranjan Vasudeo Kolambe v. Appa alias Hanmant Maroti Hatnure and Another
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against refusal of interim injunction in a copyright infringement suit involving coaching class notes on Indian Constitution and Economy, holding that no prima facie case of infringement was made out at the interlocutory stage.
M/s. T. Bhimjyani Realty Pvt. Ltd. v. Mr. Vineet Sachdeva & Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that RERA authorities have jurisdiction to examine fraud allegations in real estate disputes but must balance this with the summary nature of proceedings and the protection of allottee rights, remanding the matter for detailed inquiry.
M/s. Rashmi Realty Builders Pvt. Ltd. v. Rahul Rajendrakumar Pagariya & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that disputes under RERA are non-arbitrable despite arbitration clauses, affirming the Authority's jurisdiction to order refund with interest to homebuyers.
Kausa Jama Masjid Trust v. Fashibai Bhagirath Bhagat & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a suit for easementary right of way over Waqf property without dispute over Waqf rights is maintainable in Civil Court, and dismissed the suit for lack of cause of action and jurisdictional bar.
Mrs. Dagdabai Vitthal Kadam v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a successor inheriting property after the appointed date under the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, is entitled to separate rehabilitation benefits and directed allotment of alternate land to the petitioner.
Roshanbi Aziz Motiwala v. Union of India
The Court held that the rehabilitation and resettlement provisions of the 2013 Act apply to land acquisition under the National Highways Act and directed fresh reasoned adjudication of petitioners' claims beyond mere mechanical reliance on non-statutory guidelines.
Shri Balaso Bhimgonda Patil v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that an unregistered partition deed of joint Hindu family property does not require compulsory registration and set aside the trial court's order impounding the deed and the Collector's demand for deficit stamp duty and penalty.
Tika Ram v. Chet Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's revision challenging the trial court's refusal to grant summary judgment on disputed facts concerning the validity and cancellation of a General Power of Attorney and related property transfers.
Munendra Kumar v. Government of NCT Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that suspension of a government servant can be validly extended beyond three months without issuance of charge sheet if justified reasons are recorded, dismissing the petition challenging the suspension order.
M/S CENTURY 21 MALLS PVT LTD. v. BEYOND MALLS LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction of the seat of arbitration and refused interim reliefs under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, granting liberty to file a fresh application before the Arbitrator.
Amaterasu Foods Pvt Ltd v. Brajesh Kumar Prop of M/S Kumar Interiors
The High Court restored the defendant's struck-off defence after suit amendment, directing filing of amended written statement with costs, allowing the petition to proceed.
Santosh Kumar Dewan v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to decide the petitioner's representation for regularization of property by a speaking order within 12 weeks, restraining coercive action meanwhile.
Employees Provident Fund Organization and Another v. M. Arumugham
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 227 lies with the High Court where the cause of action arose and allowed withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court.
Chandra Kala Rai v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies Delhi and Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cooperative society election results for non-availment of the statutory remedy under Section 70 of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003.
M/S ELECTRONIC PLANET v. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 227 where the cause of action arose outside Delhi and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate jurisdictional High Court.