Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Enserve Electrocon Furnishers Private Limited v. Sammaan Capital Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to decide jurisdictional and impleadment issues arising from an arbitration clause in a Settlement Agreement, directing the arbitration tribunal to adjudicate these preliminary objections.
Suresh Shah v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration was an International Commercial Arbitration under Section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, a non-derogable provision, and allowed the challenge to the arbitral awards accordingly.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD. v. BANSAL STEELS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH VIKAS AGGARWAL AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration of loan repayment disputes in accordance with the arbitration clause and institutional rules.
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Omega Manpower Solution
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement, despite respondents' non-appearance.
Dr Deepak Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking a 'Renowned Shot' certificate under the 'Master Men Category', holding that the petitioner competed and qualified only in the 'Men Category' and is not entitled to category-specific certification for a category he did not participate in.
Anil Kumar v. Parveen Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order summoning the petitioner's wife as a witness under Section 311 CrPC to ensure just adjudication in a Section 138 NI Act complaint, emphasizing the discretionary but judicious use of such power.
Anil Kumar v. Princy
The Delhi High Court upheld the Magistrate's order allowing summoning of a bank clerk under Section 311 CrPC to clarify payment mode in a cheque dishonor case, emphasizing the discretionary power to ensure a just trial.
Puja Airy v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging SARFAESI proceedings for non-compliance with mandatory pre-deposit under Section 18, holding that disputed factual issues must be decided by the Debt Recovery Tribunal/Appellate Tribunal.
Smt Mehul Singh Ahluwalia v. Sh. Rishi Verma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s appeal challenging the dismissal of an application concerning delayed replies and upheld procedural directions after the appellant unconditionally withdrew a prior Chamber Appeal.
Ajay Narain v. Arti Singh & Kanwar Raj Singh
The Delhi High Court held that registered Agreements to Sell and related documents constituted valid sale transactions of property floors, rejecting the plaintiff's claim that they were mere security for loans, and allowed the defendants' suit for specific performance.
M/S. Kavita Enterprises v. Airport Authority of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking return of long-withheld Fixed Deposit Receipts and Earnest Money Deposits as barred by limitation and laches, emphasizing that writ jurisdiction is not a substitute for civil remedies in time-barred contractual disputes.
Amritpal Singh v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail petition of Amritpal Singh in a large-scale heroin smuggling case, holding that he failed to satisfy the stringent bail conditions under the NDPS Act given his role in the international drug syndicate and unexplained recovery of Rs. 1.34 crores.
Ravi Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, modifying the conviction from Section 397 IPC to Section 392 IPC due to failure to prove use of a deadly weapon and ordered the appellant's release for lack of conclusive evidence on identity and recovery.
Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh; Mr. Lzafeer Ahmad; Mr. SAdheer Aaryaan Sudanand; Mr. Chaitanya Gosain v. Union of India and Another
The Delhi High Court directed the IOA to constitute an ad-hoc committee to conduct fair selection trials for Indian Curling athletes for the 9th Asian Winter Games, pending resolution of the NSF recognition dispute.
Arvind Dham v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court quashed the petitioner’s arrest under Section 19 PMLA for non-compliance with statutory and constitutional safeguards including failure to provide reasons to believe and grounds of arrest.
Gulshan Kumar v. Indu Soni
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal and upheld the trial court's partial decree for recovery of possession based on admitted tenancy and termination despite pending security deposit refund.
VRC CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI's annulment of a tender due to procedural non-compliance in bid security submission, affirming the authority's power to annul tenders without arbitrariness and dismissed the petition challenging the annulment.
Ashok v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure to put material evidence under Section 313 CrPC and denial of effective legal aid, emphasizing the fundamental right to a fair trial.
Bastiram v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation
The Supreme Court awarded compensation to a dismissed employee, modifying the High Court's order on jurisdiction without deciding the issue, thereby resolving a long-pending labor dispute.
Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith v. Government of Gujarat
The Supreme Court held that under the applicable pension scheme, the State Government alone is liable to pay retiral benefits to an employee of a Grant-in-Aid institution, rejecting the institution's liability despite its litigation conduct.