Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Phool Singh
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination due to lack of reasoned discussion and restored the matter for fresh consideration.
Mohd Sadik v. Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation and interest awarded to a minor injured in a motor vehicle accident, applying Supreme Court guidelines on disability compensation and interest rates.
Wakil Kumar @ Wakil Das v. Arvind Biswakarma
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing functional disability assessment and awarding additional damages for non-pecuniary losses including attendant charges and loss of marriage prospects.
SMT. MST. MST. MS. SH. v. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reducing personal expense deduction and contributory negligence, affirming principles on dependents and negligence apportionment.
National Insurance Company v. Zahida Kausar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld 10% permanent functional disability and enhanced compensation to the injured despite no loss of salary, dismissing the Insurance Company's appeal.
Barkha Singh v. Vikram
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application for interrogatories in a property dispute, holding that where relevant title documents are already on record, interrogatories seeking the same are not warranted.
The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award holding the insurer liable for compensation despite the trolley not being separately insured and refused deduction of amounts received under a separate Group Personal Accident Policy.
Capt. Retd Jagadish Rath v. State of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed a rape FIR alleging consent obtained by false promise of marriage, holding that a prolonged consensual relationship negates vitiated consent and the FIR was an abuse of process.
Deepak Kumar v. Abdul Sajim
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded for a fatal road accident, ruling that the deceased's lack of license and helmet did not constitute contributory negligence, and the appellant's rash driving was solely responsible.
Pawan Gupta v. Sanjeev Mahajan
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the respondent in a criminal complaint alleging assault, criminal intimidation, and breach of trust, emphasizing appellate restraint in overturning acquittals absent perverse findings.
Tamanna Singh v. Crescent Financial Service Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petitions seeking deletion of a designated partner's name from an eviction suit, holding that her personal liability is a triable issue requiring evidence.
VERSUS
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of the application to reject a defamation suit plaint, holding that a prima facie cause of action was disclosed and the suit was within limitation considering COVID-19 extensions.
Meena Jain v. Bhupinder Singh
The High Court held that a subsequent suit based on different title documents over the same property cannot be stayed under Section 10 CPC merely due to pendency of an earlier suit.
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GMBH v. The Controller of Patents
The Delhi High Court set aside the Controller’s rejection of a patent application for lack of inventive step and remanded the matter for fresh, reasoned consideration addressing the applicant’s submissions.
Mahavir Transmission Limited v. Balaji Traders
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a defective supply under a Purchase Order, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
M/S VATIKA LIMITED & ORS v. M/S SAMMAAN CAPITAL LIMITED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to decide disputes including jurisdiction and impleadment of non-signatories arising from a Settlement Agreement arbitration clause, treating the Section 9 petition as a Section 17 application.
Enserve Electrocon Furnishers Private Limited v. Sammaan Capital Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to decide jurisdictional and impleadment issues arising from an arbitration clause in a Settlement Agreement, directing the arbitration tribunal to adjudicate these preliminary objections.
Suresh Shah v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration was an International Commercial Arbitration under Section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration Act, 1996, a non-derogable provision, and allowed the challenge to the arbitral awards accordingly.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD. v. BANSAL STEELS THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH VIKAS AGGARWAL AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration of loan repayment disputes in accordance with the arbitration clause and institutional rules.
Moneywise Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Omega Manpower Solution
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration agreement, despite respondents' non-appearance.