Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Hotel Corporation of India Limited v. Sudesh Kumar Julka
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's rejection of approval for dismissal due to a vitiated domestic enquiry and the petitioner's failure to seek timely permission to lead evidence.
Ram Preet v. State
The Delhi High Court modified the conviction of a man accused of sexual assault on a minor from aggravated penetrative sexual assault under POCSO to sexual assault under Sections 7/8 POCSO and Section 354B IPC due to lack of medical evidence of penetration.
Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd. v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court held that immunity under Section 32A of the IBC protects a corporate debtor from prosecution post-resolution plan approval with change of management but does not bar investigation, and thus refused to quash the FIR against the petitioner company.
Vishwajeet Singh and Ors. v. Sh Subhasish Panda
Delhi High Court upheld DDA's authority to demolish and reconstruct unsafe residential towers at Signature View Apartments with reasonable rehabilitation, affirming public interest and statutory compliance.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed banks and domain registrars to strictly implement government-mandated procedures and technological safeguards to prevent trademark infringement and cyber fraud involving domain names and payment systems.
SecLink Technologies Corporation v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The court upheld the cancellation of the earlier Dharavi redevelopment tender due to material changes involving railway land inclusion and dismissed the petition challenging the fresh tender and award to respondent No.3.
The State of Maharashtra v. Swenjita Sanjeet Goraksha and Anr.
The Bombay High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a criminal case arising from a civil dispute, holding that inconsistent and uncorroborated prosecution evidence failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Nisar Abdul Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra and Anr.
The High Court quashed the conviction under Section 326 IPC due to inconsistencies and lack of corroborative evidence, allowing the criminal revision and ordering the applicant's release.
AFX+Q Engineers v. Nikita Udyog
The Bombay High Court held that it has jurisdiction under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. to accept consent terms and allow compounding of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act even after conviction and appeal, subject to conditions and in the interest of justice.
AFX+Q Engineers and Anr. v. Nikita Udyog and Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that it has jurisdiction under Section 397 Cr.P.C. to accept compromise terms and allow compounding of offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act even after conviction and appeal, subject to conditions in the interest of justice.
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd v. Sapna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by recalculating compensation for a deceased motor accident victim, adjusting dependency deductions and affirming income assessment based on pre-pandemic returns.
Aditya Singh v. Consortium of National Law Universities
Delhi High Court partially allowed a writ petition challenging CLAT-2025 answer key, correcting two questions while upholding others, emphasizing limited judicial interference in academic matters unless answer keys are demonstrably incorrect.
Manu Prashant Wig v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a large-scale investment fraud case, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and prolonged judicial custody without trial conclusion.
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd v. Khem Chand Alias Bittu
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal challenging compensation awarded for permanent disability and upheld the full quantum including non-pecuniary damages and 100% functional disability assessment.
Ajay Bhatia v. Jitender
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's eviction petition under the DRC Act, holding that bona fide requirement and non-availability of suitable alternate accommodation were proved, and adverse inference was warranted against the tenant for failing to lead evidence.
Glaxo Group Limited v. Gurmukh Kapoor
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and costs to Glaxo Group Limited against Levotic Pharma for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving deceptively similar marks and packaging.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shishpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court revised the compensation award in a motor accident claim by correcting the deceased's age, applying Uttar Pradesh minimum wages, upholding loss of consortium to the unmarried sister, and maintaining 8% interest.
M S Aishwarya Lakshmi Construction v. M S Empathy Infra and Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve payment disputes arising from a construction contract, after the petitioner demonstrated valid arbitration agreement and sufficient service attempts despite respondent's non-appearance.
Sarath Kanth Yalmarthy v. FIITJEE Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate an employment dispute involving non-payment of full and final settlement.
Nelakuduru Infra Sriganesh JV v. Northern Railway & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the question of arbitrability of disputes including excepted matters is to be decided by the arbitral tribunal and not at the appointment stage.