Narinder Kumar Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 20 Dec 2024 · 2024:DHC:9881-DB
Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur
W.P.(C) 17606/2024
2024:DHC:9881-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for increments in light of Supreme Court precedent within eight weeks, allowing the writ petition with liberty for further legal recourse.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 17606/2024
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 20.12.2024
W.P.(C) 17606/2024
NARINDER KUMAR BHARDWAJ .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pramod Kumar Tiwari, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, SPC
WITH
Mr. Kanishk Kharbanda and
Mr. Avinash Singh, Advs. and AC Raj Kumar, SI Praladh and
SI Amit Kumar, CISF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 74898/2024
JUDGMENT

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the respondents to grant him his due increments in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. versus C.P.Mundinamani & Ors. 2023 SCC OnLine SC 401.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the present, the petitioner will be satisfied, in case the respondents are directed to examine his claims in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. (supra) in a timebound manner.

4. Issue notice.

5. Notice is accepted by Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents. He has no objection if the present petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to take a final decision regarding the petitioner’s claim in a time-bound manner.

6. The learned counsel for the respondents has drawn our attention to the Office Memorandum dated 14.10.2024, issued by the Department of Personnel & Training, whereby it has been decided to implement the interim Order dated 06.09.2024, passed by the Supreme Court in MA Dy. N.2400/2024, without prejudice to the stand of the respondents and without prejudice to any change in law in that regard.

7. In light of this fair stand taken by the respondents, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s claim, as raised in the present petition, within a period of eight weeks from today and pass a reasoned and speaking order qua the petitioner.

8. Needless to state, while taking a decision on the petitioner’s claim, the respondents will take into account the decision dated 11.04.2023 of the Supreme Court in Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. (supra) read with the clarificatory order passed by the Supreme Court in S.L.P. (C) 4722/2021 on 06.09.2024. It is further made clear that in case the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

NAVIN CHAWLA, J SHALINDER KAUR, J DECEMBER 20, 2024/ss/sk Click here to check corrigendum, if any