Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
K S Bakshi & Ors. v. Surinder Nath HUF & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, holding that the landlord had better title, the agreed rent was Rs. 1,500 within jurisdictional limits, tenants attorned to the landlord, and bona fide need was established.
Renu Garg; Naresh Garg v. The State
The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against petitioners for illegal adoption and child trafficking under IPC and Juvenile Justice Act, emphasizing compliance with prescribed adoption procedures.
TEK TRAVELS PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURSAHIB SINGH SETHI & ORS.
The Delhi High Court recalled an ex parte order against defendants due to their counsel's negligence, allowing them to be heard but without reviving their closed right to file a written statement.
Vijay Enterprises & Anr. v. The Principal Commissioner of Customs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 15-year-old Customs Show Cause Notice and consequential order due to inordinate delay violating statutory limitation and principles of natural justice.
Tilak Raj Jain and Anr. v. Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Delhi Zonal Unit and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 2008 Show Cause Notice under the Customs Act due to inordinate delay exceeding statutory limitation, holding that repeated call book placements do not justify non-adjudication.
Polyglass Acrylic Manufacturing Co Pvt Ltd v. Additional Director General, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a nine-year-old Customs Show Cause Notice due to unjustified delay in adjudication beyond the statutory period under Section 28(9) of the Customs Act, 1962.
Shri Inderjeet Singh Bindra v. Smt Ramesh Kumari and Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Plaintiff's review petition seeking cancellation of a Power of Attorney on limitation grounds, holding that the amendment was barred under Article 59 of the Limitation Act and that review jurisdiction is limited to correcting patent errors.
M/S NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 16 1 & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that a notice under Section 148 issued in the name of a non-existent amalgamated company is validly construed as a Section 148A(b) notice and does not vitiate reassessment proceedings continued under a subsequent valid Section 148 notice.
Satya Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court quashed an illegal demand notice by NDMC and directed re-computation of license fee from 2002 excluding arrears cleared by prior sub-lettees, enforcing its earlier judgment.
Ajay Singh Kushwaha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioner's pending representation within eight weeks, without expressing any opinion on merits or limitation.
Brij Kishor and Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and decide the petitioners' claims for retrospective pay scale benefits within twelve weeks, referencing a recent precedent, without expressing opinion on merits.
Amit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a CISF dismissal order on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Sayresh Dhavj Dhangda v. Staff Selection Commission and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical fitness in recruitment for lack of territorial jurisdiction, upholding the binding nature of jurisdiction clauses in recruitment advertisements.
Urmila v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of conspiracy to murder, emphasizing the lack of direct evidence and prolonged pre-trial detention.
Ex CPO Jitendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's refusal to expedite hearing of a service termination challenge, holding no legal infirmity in the tribunal's scheduling discretion.
Baksish Ahmad v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a BSF dismissal order on the ground of lack of territorial jurisdiction, applying the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Kiran Sehgal v. Veena Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining appellants from using deceptively similar trademarks 'POWERMEN DLX' and 'POWERMEN MAXX' against the respondent's registered mark 'POWERMAN', affirming that registration does not bar passing off claims.
Habib Ahmad v. The Commissioner MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance of its order on unauthorized construction, holding that ongoing appeals preclude contempt until final adjudication, but granted liberty to revive the petition if non-compliance persists.
Sonansh Creations Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening of the petitioner’s income tax assessment for AY 2015-16 due to lack of credible material exceeding the ₹50 lakh threshold and non-compliance with procedural safeguards under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Satish Builders v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, upholding the arbitrator's reasoned findings on delay attribution, escalation claims, and contract interpretation under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.