Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/s Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Another
The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether writ petitions are maintainable against orders of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under the MSMED Act and the scope of writ jurisdiction vis-à-vis statutory arbitration remedies.
Mohd. Tahir Hussain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that interim bail cannot be granted solely for election campaigning, but allowed limited interim bail for filing nomination, with a split verdict on bail for campaigning.
Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani & Prajakta Chandrashekhar Chaugule v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a removed slum rehabilitation developer loses rights to free sale area but State authorities must act lawfully and in good faith, setting aside unlawful demolition and directing compensation or equivalent area to petitioners.
Sukhshanti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Mr. Nishant M. Mahimtura & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held flat owners guilty of contempt for unauthorized amalgamation of flats without municipal permission, directed strict enforcement by BMC, and ordered restoration of the premises.
Rakesh Brijlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra
Criminal proceedings under PMLA and IPC were quashed as the dispute was contractual and no prima facie offence of cheating or money laundering was made out.
Navneet Singh Gogia and Simran Kaur Gogia v. The State of Maharashtra and Sushma B. Chandak
The High Court held that in cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, the trial court may proceed and convict in absence of the accused without recording Section 313 statement if the accused persistently absents without justification.
Jaysingh Revaji Patil v. The Municipal Corporation Malegaon
The Bombay High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge a Municipal Corporation notice under Sections 52 and 53 of the MRTP Act and must seek remedy against the landlord in civil court.
Vivek Krushna Dode v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge municipal notices under the MRTP Act and must seek remedy against the landlord in civil court.
Aziza Kilicheva v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that bail proceedings relate only to judicial custody and courts cannot direct visa issuance or interfere with executive detention under the Foreigners Act while granting bail to a foreign national.
Metomatic Industries Pvt. Ltd v. PRV Alloys LLP
The High Court dismissed the appeal against a decree passed without deciding the jurisdictional plea, directing the appellant to seek review before the trial court as the appropriate remedy.
Jagdish Sharma v. Navtej Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by awarding loss of income during treatment, future earnings, and non-pecuniary damages due to permanent disability and amputation.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – 1, New Delhi v. DCM Shriram Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s deletion of transfer pricing adjustments based on Indian Energy Exchange rates, holding that SEB rates constitute appropriate comparables for determining arm’s length price under Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act.
M/S OM GEMS AND JEWELLERY v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) AIR CARGO COMPLEX NSCBI AIRPORT & ORS
The Delhi High Court directed immediate release of the Bank Guarantee with interest and permitted the petitioner to appeal the delayed final customs assessment order, emphasizing compliance with judicial directions independent of appeal proceedings.
Quartz Commercial Pvt Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Ward 20(3)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Assessee’s appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, upholding concurrent findings of tax authorities that additions on account of accommodation entries and commission income were justified and clarifying that no remand to the AO was made by the court.
Om Prakash Lakhina v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 ceases against a company that ceases to be a 'State' due to disinvestment before the writ is decided, dismissing the petition and directing alternative remedies.
Pardeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it with a personal hearing and reasoned order within twelve weeks, allowing further legal recourse if aggrieved.
M/S Apollo Hospitals Enterprises Private Limited v. Shri Suresh Malik & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that while the workmen were illegally terminated, reinstatement was not feasible due to cessation of posts and delay, awarding compensation instead.
Yogesh Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a director who was a mere figurehead without active involvement or criminal intent in alleged loan diversion and conspiracy.
Kapil Dev Pasricha v. The State NCT of Delhi
Bail application of the main accused in a large-scale financial fraud involving over 10,000 investors was dismissed due to gravity of offence, prior criminal record, and evasion of arrest.
Mr. Brijesh Chaudary, Mr. Prins Kumar and Mr. Aditya Chauhan v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the DDA's order addressing parking and pedestrian access issues near a school, directing timely implementation and disposing of the petitions accordingly.