Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Ravi Arora v. Shri Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order, holding that the landlord's bona fide need must be assessed as of the petition date, subsequent events are generally irrelevant unless they completely eclipse the need, and prior business experience is not required to establish bona fide requirement.
P.K. Rawal, Tarun Agarwal, Ankita Singh and Akhil Singh v. Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that subsequent events do not negate landlord's need unless they completely eclipse it, and revision jurisdiction is limited to procedural scrutiny without reappraisal of evidence.
P.K. Rawal, Tarun Agarwal, Ankita Singh and Akhil Singh v. Vijay Shanker & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order, holding that the landlord's bona fide need must be assessed as of the petition filing date and that subsequent events do not negate such need unless they completely eclipse it.
Jitendra Kumar Kaushik v. UCO Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a bank officer for unauthorized borrowing and misappropriation of customer funds, affirming the disciplinary authorities’ findings and the proportionality of the punishment.
Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, New Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional challenges to arbitration under the MSMED Act cannot be entertained via writ petition once arbitration has commenced, affirming the arbitrator's jurisdiction and dismissing the appeal.
Sanjeev Gupta v. Registrar General Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking judicial directions on procedural reforms in case filing and listing, holding such matters fall within the Court’s administrative domain.
Manish Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a service appointment, reaffirming the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal in service matters and the requirement of locus standi for such challenges.
Manish Yadav v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that consensual sexual relations based on a promise to marry do not constitute rape absent proof of mala fide intent, quashing the appellant's summoning order under IPC and SC/ST Act.
Surendra G. Shankar & Anr. v. Esque Finamark Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that delay in filing appeals before the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal should have been condoned and restored the appeals for merits, clarifying that appellate courts must not decide merits when ruling on delay condonation.
Thammaraya and Another v. State of Karnataka
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants due to failure of the prosecution to prove disclosure statements and recoveries as per law, highlighting strict adherence to principles governing circumstantial evidence and Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
Baban Shankar Daphal & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for murder based on credible eyewitness testimony corroborated by medical evidence, rejecting acquittal due to minor inconsistencies and affirming that related witnesses' evidence must be carefully scrutinized but not discarded.
RUHI AGRAWAL & ANR. v. NIMISH S. AGRAWAL
The Supreme Court upheld expanded visitation rights for the father with interim supervision by a female court-appointed Commissioner, balancing the child's welfare with parental involvement during custody litigation.
M/s Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Limited v. Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council and Another
The Supreme Court referred to a larger Bench the question of whether writ petitions are maintainable against orders of the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council under the MSMED Act and the scope of writ jurisdiction vis-à-vis statutory arbitration remedies.
Mohd. Tahir Hussain v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that interim bail cannot be granted solely for election campaigning, but allowed limited interim bail for filing nomination, with a split verdict on bail for campaigning.
Kamal Sevakram Jadhawani & Prajakta Chandrashekhar Chaugule v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that a removed slum rehabilitation developer loses rights to free sale area but State authorities must act lawfully and in good faith, setting aside unlawful demolition and directing compensation or equivalent area to petitioners.
Sukhshanti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Mr. Nishant M. Mahimtura & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held flat owners guilty of contempt for unauthorized amalgamation of flats without municipal permission, directed strict enforcement by BMC, and ordered restoration of the premises.
Rakesh Brijlal Jain v. State of Maharashtra
Criminal proceedings under PMLA and IPC were quashed as the dispute was contractual and no prima facie offence of cheating or money laundering was made out.
Navneet Singh Gogia and Simran Kaur Gogia v. The State of Maharashtra and Sushma B. Chandak
The High Court held that in cheque bounce cases under Section 138 NI Act, the trial court may proceed and convict in absence of the accused without recording Section 313 statement if the accused persistently absents without justification.
Jaysingh Revaji Patil v. The Municipal Corporation Malegaon
The Bombay High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge a Municipal Corporation notice under Sections 52 and 53 of the MRTP Act and must seek remedy against the landlord in civil court.
Vivek Krushna Dode v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge municipal notices under the MRTP Act and must seek remedy against the landlord in civil court.