Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Mohit Garg
The Delhi High Court held that investigation into offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act can proceed against unknown public servants without prior approval under Section 17A, which is required only after their identity is established.
Chando Devi & Ors. v. Uttam Chand & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the death of a co-owner during appeal does not abate the appeal if other co-owners represent the estate, upheld the executing court's jurisdiction and rejected attempts to delay execution by demarcation or superstructure claims.
COWI India Pvt Ltd v. Pinnacle Air Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a winding-up petition pending before it without irreversible steps can be transferred suo motu to the NCLT under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, even without a formal application.
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dalvir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the notional income of a deceased homemaker for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be at least the prevailing minimum wages, granted 40% future prospects, and upheld deductions for personal expenses, modifying the compensation award accordingly.
Dhirendra Kumar Sinha v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of Dearness Relief paid during re-employment is lawful where the pensioner misrepresented facts, denying him equitable relief under Rafiq Masih.
Goodearth Bricks Pvt Ltd v. Movie Time Cinema Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to admit additional documents in a commercial suit due to the petitioner's failure to show sufficient cause for delay under Order 11 Rule 1 CPC as amended by the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Bharat Yatra Trust and Ors. v. H.N Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that leave to sue under Section 92 CPC must be expressly granted and cannot be presumed, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of maintainability where only one plaintiff survived.
Ramesh Shukla v. Anuradha Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking early hearing of an appeal against a possession decree, holding that execution proceedings may continue pending the scheduled appellate hearing and that delay tactics are impermissible.
Satpal Khurana v. Beerwati
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant, emphasizing the limited scope of revision jurisdiction under the Delhi Rent Control Act and granted the tenant additional time to vacate subject to conditions.
Jagdish Yadav v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking possession of a shop allotted by NDMC, holding that the appellant's inordinate delay and failure to take timely legal action disentitled him from relief despite non-possession.
Khalil Ahmad v. Jatin Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court allowed phased release of compensation awarded in a motor accident claim, emphasizing the claimant’s right to access funds for daily needs despite free government medical treatment and absence of documentary proof.
National Insurance Company Limited v. Amresh Rana; National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Krishan Lal Dhingra
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awards in motor accident claims, ruling no contributory negligence by the deceased driver despite alleged invalid license, and affirmed the assessed notional income and interest rate.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax - 1 v. M/s Chemester Food Industries Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act for lack of territorial jurisdiction as the original assessment order was passed by the AO in Amritsar.
Sushil Sagar v. M/S Prabhdit Associates Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant additional time to vacate shop premises subject to payment of user charges and compliance with conditions, dissolving interim protection upon default.
Nami Chand Jain v. Arun Grover & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate commercial premises upon filing an undertaking, with interim protection conditional on compliance and landlords waiving claims for damages.
Surjeet Singh Bindra v. M/S Prabhdit Associates Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant interim protection until 31.12.2025 subject to payment of Rs. 5,000 monthly user charges and compliance with conditions, failing which protection would be dissolved and possession recovered.
M/S K D R PVT LTD v. M/S PRABHDIT ASSOCIATES PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court directed the tenant to pay user and occupation charges during interim protection and vacate the premises by a fixed date, failing which interim protection would be dissolved.
Ashok Kumar Chopra v. Hotel Zodiac Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court granted a conditional stay of eviction until 30.06.2025 subject to the tenant filing an undertaking to vacate the premises and comply with specified conditions.
Ramjas Foundation v. Babbal Bhatia
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement granting the tenant extended time to vacate premises subject to payment of use and occupation charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying eviction till 31.03.2026.
Deepak Rathi & Anr. v. Shubham Jain
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection from eviction to tenants who undertook to vacate the premises by a specified date and comply with conditions, staying the eviction order subject to strict compliance.