Search Judgments

Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name

Surinder Singh v. UOI & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:162-DB

Lalea Trading Limited v. Anant Raj Projects Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:157

The Delhi High Court declined Lalea Trading's plea to deposit the entire exit amount in a no-lien account pending arbitration but directed deposit of the undisputed buy-back amount and security of title deeds, emphasizing judicial discretion under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act and the need for formal arbitration invocation.

corporate petition_dismissed

NTPC LTD v. DCIT & Others

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:156-DB

Subhash Chander v. UOI & Ors.

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:161-DB

Suresh Hingorani v. State of Haryana

Supreme Court of India · 10 Jan 2013

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for forgery and personation under Sections 419 and 467 IPC, modifying the sentence on humanitarian grounds but dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Vinay Kanodia v. J.P. Singh & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 10 Jan 2013

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order quashing prosecution for illegal detention and assault, directing the trial to proceed based on medical evidence of injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed

Chinnam Kameswara Rao & Ors. v. State of A.P. Rep. by Home Secretary

Supreme Court of India · 10 Jan 2013

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of trial court acquittal, affirming that appellate courts may convict under Section 302 read with 34 IPC despite absence of charge under Section 34 if no prejudice is shown and common intention is established.

criminal appeal_dismissed

Arun Bhandari v. State of U.P.

Supreme Court of India · 10 Jan 2013

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing cognizance against the accused wife in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, emphasizing that prima facie criminal intent must be presumed at the cognizance stage and that absence of privity of contract alone does not bar prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed

DELHI PUNJAB GOODS CARRIER v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Delhi High Court · 10 Jan 2013 · 2016:DHC:293-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that DDA's jurisdiction to seal property depends on whether the land is within a development area and that title vests in the acquiring authority post acquisition.

property appeal_dismissed

Mr. Rajiv Aneja, Advocate. v. RESHU GARG

Delhi High Court · 09 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:153

dated 09.01.2013 MALA MEHRA v. MCD AND ORS

Delhi High Court · 09 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:152

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VII v. CORAM:-

Delhi High Court · 09 Jan 2013 · 2013:DHC:144-DB