Full Text
W.P.(C) 8024/2012 & C.M.No.20035/2012.
KESHAV SECURITY SERVICES Petitioner
SURE EYE SECURITY Petitioner
TIBRA CHAUKAS SECURITY SERVICES Petitioner
Kumar Singh, Ms.Neetu Jain, Advs. for the petitioners.
Mr.Rajeeve Mehra, ASGwithMrJatan Singh, CGSC withMr.Tushar
Singh, Adv. for UOI.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN
09.01.2013 W.Ps.(C) 8024/2012, 8025/2012, 8059/2012 Page I of3. _
2013:DHC:7267-DB <-
ORDER
1. Issue relating to the new wage structure brought about by the Office Memorandum No.28(3)/2012-D(Res-I) dated 9"^ July, 2012 and the consequential publication of the same on 1^' October, 2012, came up for consideration before this Court in, W.P.(C) No.7365/2012 titled M/s Gaheli Security Services Vs. Union ofIndia & Anr. Having noticed the submissions of the learned Additional Solicitor General, on instructions, that various representations received by the Government to make amendment to the Office Memorandum dated 9^*" July, 2012 with regard to the new wage structure was under consideration, this Court did not entertain the writ petition as the representations had drawn the attention of the respondent/Government.
2. In these writ petitions though the petitioners have not approached this Court questioning the new wage structure, they have raised the grievance relating to other service conditions in respect of the same Office Memorandum dated 9"^ July, 2012.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. We are of the considered view that all these petitions can be treated by the respondent/UOI as representations in respect of the grievance raised by the petitioners and they can also be considered by the Government while considering the various representations as mentioned in our earlier orderdated 07.12.2012 in W.P.(C) No.7365/2012.
4. In view of the above, all these petitions are disposed of with a direction to the respondent who is represented through the learned ASG to treat the petitions as representations and the grievance can also be looked into along with other representations. W.Ps. (C) 8024/2012, 8025/2012, 8059/2012 Page[2] of[3] >
5. With the above observations, the petitions are disposed of. However, we may observe that in the event the representations are not decided and disposed of in a period of three months from today, it shall be open to the petitioners to approach this Court for appropriate relief.
6. Order Dasti.
CHIEF JUSTICJ JANUARY 09, 2013 'anb' W.Ps.(C) 8024/2012, 8025/2012, 8059/2012 V.K. JAIN, J Page 3 of[3]