Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Attar Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a police officer for unauthorized absence due to failure to produce medical evidence during inquiry and dismissed his writ petition.
Rishi Pal Singh v. Commissioner of Police and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for cadre change and promotion, holding that such relief requires compliance with governing rules and cannot be granted merely on parity or after litigating for promotion within the original cadre.
K.C. Meena & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's directions that SC candidates promoted on merit are treated as General Category and roster vacancies filled by SC candidates in place of unavailable ST candidates are deemed filled for future roster purposes.
Ravi Singhal & Ors. v. Manali Singhal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal to amend pleadings challenging a family settlement agreement, holding that such amendments were unnecessary and the agreement enforceable despite not being signed by all HUF co-parceners.
Prasar Bharti v. Harikesh BS Gautam
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must first determine its jurisdiction over contractual appointments before adjudicating selection disputes, setting aside prior orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Prasar Bharti v. Harikesh BS Gautam
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must first determine its jurisdiction over contractual appointments before adjudicating selection disputes, setting aside prior orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
Prasar Bharti v. Harikesh BS Gautam and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must first determine its jurisdiction over contractual appointments before adjudicating selection disputes and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
Prasar Bharti v. Harikesh BS Gautam
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must first determine its jurisdiction over contractual appointments before adjudicating selection disputes, setting aside prior orders and remanding the matter for fresh consideration.
P.K. NAYYAR & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court ordered the relocation of a biomedical waste treatment facility operating near a residential area to protect public health and uphold the constitutional right to a pollution-free environment.
Mahesh Chand v. DTC
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality and fairness of a domestic inquiry and the termination of an employee for unauthorized absence, emphasizing that admission of charges negates the need for management witnesses and that absence without valid medical proof constitutes misconduct.
M/S SMCC-SCC-PVCC JV v. Rail Vikas Nigam Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award dismissing claims barred by a mutually agreed Supplementary Agreement closing the contract and accepted final payment, emphasizing limited court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
P.K. NAYYAR v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court ordered the relocation of a bio-medical waste treatment facility operating near a residential colony due to health and environmental hazards, affirming the fundamental right to a pollution-free environment under Article 21.
ABBAS ALI v. STATE OF PUNJAB
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 25 of the NDPS Act, ruling that physical disability does not absolve an accused from statutory presumption of culpability or negate permission for use of vehicle in drug transportation.
Union of India and Anr v. Syed Sajid Ali
The Court held that the effective date of suspension is the date of issuance of the order with immediate effect, and suspension extensions granted after 90 days without prior review are invalid, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Am A* v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed police to provide protection to petitioners married under Muslim rites who faced threats from relatives, ensuring their safety and personal liberty.