Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Union of India v. M/S Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that delay beyond the statutory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be condoned, dismissing the petition challenging the arbitral award as time barred.
Parshottam Sarup Aggarwal (H.U.F) v. Dena Bank
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral rent deposits without landlord's consent after lease expiry do not renew tenancy under Section 116 of the Transfer of Property Act, granting possession to the landlord upon valid termination notices.
CIT v. Suresh Nanda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the assessee was a non-resident under section 6 of the Income-tax Act, leading to deletion of substantial additions under section 68 and dismissal of revenue appeals.
Shamshad Ali @ Naturia v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 398 IPC based on reliable eyewitness testimony despite absence of Test Identification Parade and non-examination of some witnesses.
ISEARCH AND ANR v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS IN SUPER SESSION COUNCIL OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court held that an MCI order debarring increase of MBBS seats under Clause 8(3)(l)(d) does not automatically apply to postgraduate courses and set aside subsequent PG seat rejection orders, directing fresh consideration.
Roop Lal v. Lt. Governor of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions as not pressed, allowing petitioners to withdraw and initiate fresh proceedings based on new facts constituting a fresh cause of action.
Nilender Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Single Judge's discretionary order permitting respondents to recall cross-examination and lead evidence after closure, dismissing the appellant's appeal against it.
Union of India v. Himachal Futuristic Communications Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award based on a Share Purchase Agreement, ruling that assumption of liabilities constitutes valid consideration under the Indian Contract Act and the award does not violate public policy.
Narvir Singh v. Union of India & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pro-rata pension for a retired Navy officer absorbed in a public sector undertaking without official permission, affirming that such pension entitlement requires sanctioned absorption or deputation.
Puran Chand v. Brij Lal
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal holding that under Order 2 Rule 2 CPC, all claims arising from the same cause of action must be included in one suit, barring the appellant from filing a separate suit for recovery after filing for specific performance.
MS. Parveen v. Management, Little Flowers Public Sr. Sec. School & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that unaided private schools are bound by the Delhi School Education Act to consider re-employment of employees up to 62 years, allowing the petitioner’s writ petition for re-employment consideration.
CIT v. Suresh Nanda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the assessee was a non-resident under section 6 of the Income-tax Act, leading to deletion of a major income addition under section 68 and dismissal of the revenue's appeals.
CIT v. Suresh Nanda
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s finding that the assessee was a non-resident under section 6 of the Income-tax Act, leading to deletion of additions under section 68 and dismissal of revenue’s appeals.
Digam Singh v. Anshu Prakash & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a contempt petition enforcing wage parity orders is barred by limitation and contractual employees are entitled to pay parity but not annual increments without regularization.
Mr Ashwini Kumar and Mr Puneet Saini, Advs. v. DELHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION.....
The court held that approval under Section 33(2)(b) does not negate the enforceability of an Industrial Tribunal Award reinstating a dismissed employee, directing reinstatement with continuity of service but without back wages.
Dhanpati Ram v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that meeting minutes are not binding decisions unless formalized by competent authority and communicated, dismissing the appeal challenging pay scale revision orders.
K.S. Rathi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging dismissal from CISF service, holding the disciplinary enquiry fair and the dismissal justified due to non-compliance with lawful orders and lack of credible medical evidence.
A.P. Verma v. National Council of Educational Research & Training
The Delhi High Court held that appointment through direct recruitment constitutes a fresh appointment entitling employees to switch from CPF to Pension/GPF scheme, and denial of such benefit violates Article 14.
A.P. Verma v. National Council of Educational Research & Training
The Delhi High Court held that employees appointed through direct recruitment with probation are entitled to switch from CPF to GPF/Pension scheme, and denying this right violates Article 14.
Jai Bhagwan Mittal v. Meena Jain and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a decree of possession against a tenant holding over after lease expiry, affirming that valid notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act and admissions justify summary judgment under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.