Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court applied the principles from Yoshio Kubo to uphold that income tax assessments must comply with statutory and procedural requirements, affirming or dismissing connected tax appeals accordingly.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals against various respondents, upholding the income tax assessments based on principles established in the Yoshio Kubo case.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court applied the principles from the Yoshio Kubo case to a batch of connected income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions and judicial precedents in tax assessments.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of income tax assessments against various respondents, applying principles from the precedent Yoshio Kubo case and dismissing the Commissioner's appeals.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of income tax assessments in multiple appeals, applying the legal principles established in the Yoshio Kubo case.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders based on principles established in the Yoshio Kubo case regarding valid income tax assessments.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court delivered a consolidated judgment on multiple connected income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against various respondents, referencing the principles established in the Yoshio Kubo case.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax's assessments and tax demands in multiple connected appeals, applying the principles from the Yoshio Kubo case.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of income tax assessments and demands against multiple respondents by applying principles from the Yoshio Kubo precedent, allowing the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.
Neeraj Chopra v. Beena S. Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of a Section 8 application due to non-production of the original arbitration agreement, affirming the mandatory requirement to file the original or certified arbitration agreement to invoke arbitration.
State Bank of India v. National Housing Bank
The Supreme Court upheld the Special Court's decree dismissing the National Housing Bank's suit due to suppression of material facts and lack of evidence, affirming the Special Court's exclusive jurisdiction over securities transaction disputes involving notified persons.
Dharamvir Singh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that an Armed Forces member is presumed healthy at entry and entitled to disability pension if a disease causing discharge was not recorded at entry and the Medical Board fails to provide cogent reasons to the contrary.
Anandrao Dinkar Pachundkar v. Hon’ble Minister for Revenue & Forest Department
The Bombay High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging revenue authorities’ orders denying survey and mutation based on interpolated records, holding that title disputes must be resolved through civil suit and not writ proceedings.
Raj Kumar Gupta v. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld a remand directing the Tribunal to decide matters afresh without being bound by prior observations, allowing fresh evidence and clubbing related cases for hearing.
Smt Laxmi Devi v. Shrimohdumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Executing Court's jurisdiction to frame issues during execution proceedings and dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to modify those issues.
Mr. Soli J. Sorabjee, Senior Advocate with Mr.R.K.Mehta, Mr. Antaryami Upadhyaya and Mr. Premjit Elangbam, Advocates. v. STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the regulatory orders of the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, limiting judicial interference in tariff fixation under the Electricity Act.
CNA Exports Pvt Ltd and Ors. v. Dayal D Shahdadpuri and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that amendments introducing new causes of action based on subsequent events are impermissible and transposition of parties requires clear abandonment of suit, partially allowing and partially setting aside the impugned orders.
CNA Exports Pvt Ltd and Ors. v. Dayal D Shahdadpuri and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendments clarifying share ownership but disallowed amendments introducing subsequent share transfers and reversed party transposition due to lack of clear abandonment.
Anil Kumar Rai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of Summary Security Force Court findings without reasoned orders under Rule 149 and confirmed the Director General BSF's jurisdiction to pass reasoned appellate orders.
Gurpreet Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus for FIR registration in a property dispute involving alleged forgery and impersonation, holding that disputed facts must be resolved through civil and police proceedings.