Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jamil Ahmed v. State (NCT) of Delhi
The High Court upheld kidnapping conviction under Section 363 IPC but set aside the Section 364A IPC conviction due to absence of evidence of threat or reasonable apprehension of harm to the kidnapped child.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals against various respondents, applying the principles from the Yoshio Kubo case to uphold the income tax assessments.
Radhey Shyam v. The Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that denying pension benefits based on arbitrary joining dates violates Article 14 and directed the employer to grant the petitioner the 1995 pension scheme.
Air Force School v. Shri Gagan Bhalla and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 105 does not provide for automatic confirmation after probation, confirmed that termination during a reasonable probation period is valid without a specific confirmation order, and set aside the tribunal's order deeming confirmation after one year.
Surjeet Singh Saini & Ors. v. Guru Teg Bahadur Institute of Technology & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a minority unaided college affiliated to a University is bound to implement the University's pay commission recommendations for non-teaching staff and that writ jurisdiction is maintainable against such institutions performing public functions.
R. Vasudevan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner was entitled only to cross-examine already examined prosecution witnesses and not to compel additional witnesses in departmental enquiry proceedings.
Narendra Kumar & Others v. Union of India & Others
The Delhi High Court directed the Border Road Organization to grant pay scale parity and arrears to promotee officers in line with the 5th and 6th Central Pay Commission recommendations, implementing the decision in rem.
State v. Bansi Dhar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of three respondents for attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, affirmed the reliability of interested witnesses’ evidence, and enhanced the inadequate sentence awarded by the trial court.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Ashok Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award holding the U.P. Roadways bus driver negligent and affirmed compensation based on dual income of the deceased, dismissing the UPSRTC's appeals.
M/S. JINDAL POLYESTER LIMITED v. SHRI N.K. MODI
The Delhi High Court modified the trial court's decree in a transport contract dispute by allowing partial deduction for proven short delivery but upheld territorial jurisdiction and interest entitlement.
Dr. R. Uma v. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare
The Delhi High Court held that excess payment of non-practicing allowance made contrary to the 5th Pay Commission rules is recoverable by the employer under the principle of restitution.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed multiple Income Tax Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, upholding the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's orders based on established legal principles from a prior judgment.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court delivered a reserved judgment on a batch of connected income tax appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax against various respondents, referencing the earlier Yoshio Kubo decision.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of income tax assessments against multiple respondents, applying principles from the Yoshio Kubo precedent and allowing the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of income tax assessments against multiple respondents, applying principles from Yoshio Kubo to affirm the jurisdiction and legality of the tax authorities' actions.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court disposed of a batch of connected income tax appeals by referring to the detailed judgment in Yoshio Kubo vs. Commissioner of Income Tax.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court upheld multiple income tax assessments by applying the principles from the Yoshio Kubo case, allowing the appeals filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax’s appeals against various respondents, upholding the income tax assessments based on principles established in a prior ruling.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court delivered a consolidated judgment on multiple income tax appeals referencing the principles established in the Yoshio Kubo case.
The Commissioner of Income Tax XVI v. Sh. Sashi Mukundan
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Commissioner of Income Tax's appeals upholding the validity of income tax assessments based on the precedent set in Yoshio Kubo vs. Commissioner of Income Tax.