Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Yogesh Kumar Swain v. The Management of M/S Birla Textile Mills & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of approval under Section 33(2)(b) does not automatically invalidate dismissal where parallel proceedings exist, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on the merits of the inquiry and dismissal.
Sh. G.L. Gupta v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
The Delhi High Court held that suspension beyond 90 days without valid review and extension is invalid, directing payment of consequential benefits to the employee and allowing a fresh petition on terminal benefits.
Jagat Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CISF constable for gross misconduct, affirming that disciplinary proceedings based on preponderance of evidence and proper procedure were valid despite absence of the medical certificate's author as witness.
MS Naseem Begum v. Shafi Mohd.
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal permitting an illiterate divorced woman to examine herself as a witness under Section 311 CrPC despite delay, emphasizing that litigants should not suffer due to counsel's lapses and courts must actively ensure justice.
Mohd. Islam v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of Mohd. Islam and Chander Singh based on strong circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, blood trail, and fingerprint identification, but set aside the Arms Act conviction for lack of mandatory sanction.
Ram Dhawan @ Ramdev v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for raping his minor daughter, affirming that the prosecutrix's testimony alone suffices for conviction and delay in FIR is not fatal if explained.
Gujarat State Export Corporation Ltd. v. Mukesh Tyagi
The Delhi High Court held that illegal termination without compliance of Section 25F does not automatically entitle reinstatement with back wages and awarded compensation instead, modifying the Industrial Tribunal’s Award.
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asha & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, upholding the motor accident compensation award including 50% future prospects addition and rejecting the plea for exoneration despite the driver's invalid licence.
Union of India through Ministry of External Affairs v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that personal information of passport holders is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless related to public activity or larger public interest, and directed disclosure only of non-personal passport details.
Union of India through Ministry of External Affairs v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that passport-related personal information of third parties is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless it relates to public activity or public interest, directing disclosure only of non-personal passport details.
Union of India through Ministry of External Affairs v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that passport-related personal information of third parties is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless it relates to public activity or larger public interest justifies disclosure.
Union of India v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that personal information relating to passport holders is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless it relates to public activity or larger public interest justifies disclosure.
Union of India v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that personal information of passport holders is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless larger public interest justifies disclosure, directing limited disclosure of non-personal passport details while protecting privacy.
Union of India through Ministry of External Affairs v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that personal information of passport holders is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless it relates to public activity or larger public interest, directing disclosure of non-personal passport details while protecting sensitive personal data.
Union of India v. Rajesh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that personal information of passport holders is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act unless it relates to public activity or larger public interest justifies disclosure, while non-personal passport details must be disclosed.
MAGNUM AVIATION (UK) LTD v. PAWAN HANS HELICOPTERS LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld a five-year ban on Magnum Aviation (UK) Ltd. by Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. for customs-related forgery committed by its agent, affirming the principal's liability and the State enterprise's right to ban suppliers after due process.
M/S Ludhiana Wool Emporium & Ors. v. Jasvinder Pal Singh and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging dismissal of time-barred objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and upheld costs imposed on petitioners for delaying execution of a 1998 arbitral award.
Arjun & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR and criminal proceedings under Section 307 IPC at the final trial stage despite a compromise, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the need for judicial caution.
Tilak Raj Gogia v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an arbitral award that partially allowed payment to the contractor while rejecting inflated claims and upheld forfeiture of guarantees due to non-commencement of work.
Rupinder Kaur v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail applications in a fraud case involving alleged concealment of mortgage and creation of false title documents to defraud a complainant.