Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Naresh Chand Singhal v. NDPL
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to dishonest abstraction of electricity fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Electricity Act, dismissing writ petitions challenging related orders and directing petitioners to seek remedy before the Special Court.
Naresh Chand Singhal v. NDPL
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to dishonest abstraction of electricity fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Electricity Act, and writ petitions challenging related orders before the High Court are not maintainable.
B.R. Sharma v. Syndicate Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary punishment imposed on a bank employee, holding that the enquiry findings were not perverse and Fundamental Rule 29 did not apply.
Naresh Chand Singhal v. NDPL
The Delhi High Court held that disputes relating to dishonest abstraction of electricity fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Special Court under the Electricity Act, 2003, and writ petitions challenging related orders must be dismissed in favor of remedy before the Special Court.
H.S. Rawat v. Central Board of Irrigation and Power
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Board of Irrigation and Power is not an instrumentality of the State under Article 12, and thus writ petitions against it under Article 226 are not maintainable.
Marc Bathing Luxuries Ltd. v. Income Tax Settlement Commission
The Delhi High Court set aside the Income Tax Settlement Commission's cryptic dismissal of settlement applications for lack of reasoned consideration and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication.
Prem Prakash @ Tyagi @ Prem Prakash Upadhyay v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted appellants of robbery and possession of stolen property charges due to lack of direct evidence, improper recovery procedures, and failure of prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ashok Kriplani v. Dr. Jethanand Jethwani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the refusal to initiate enquiry under Section 340 Cr.P.C., holding that taking a plea of family settlement is not a false plea warranting prosecution without clear evidence of fabrication.
SEASKY EXPORTS PVT.LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking export subsidy under the EMA scheme due to delay and failure to disclose required jute content percentage in exported products, holding that such disclosure is essential for grant of assistance.
Mohinder Pal Singh v. DDA and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a suit for cancellation of a perpetual sub-lease deed filed after over 40 years is barred by limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Din Bandhu Dass v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an AIIMS tender notice for failing to disclose evaluation criteria, directing fresh tenders with transparency and allowing the petitioner to participate.
Deepak Sapra v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court held that officers compulsorily retired as a penalty are entitled to leave encashment benefits under statutory service regulations, overruling the bank’s circular and prior contrary judgments.
Sunita v. Ranbir Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that partition suits for agricultural, industrial, and residential plots under ongoing consolidation proceedings are barred, but allowed partition of a residential house, directing amendment of the plaint accordingly.
Ranjeet Goswami v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that properly proved school records conclusively establish juvenility, overruling medical age reports, and directed trial by the Juvenile Justice Board.
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. v. N.T.P.C. Ltd.
The Supreme Court upheld CERC's authority to approve additional capital expenditure for tariff fixation without Central Electricity Authority approval post the Electricity Act, 2003 repeal of earlier statutory provisions.
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar Medical College & Ors. v. Union of India & Another
The Supreme Court upheld the Central Government's power to restrict the 2013 intake capacity enhancement benefits to Government medical colleges, dismissing claims of discrimination under Article 14.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat v. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals
The Supreme Court clarified that the Revenue is liable only to pay statutory interest on refunds under the Income Tax Act and not interest on such interest, overruling misinterpretations of the Sandvik judgment.
Gothamchand Jain v. Arumugam @ Tamilarasan
The Supreme Court held that the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 governs limitation in Pondicherry, overruling the applicability of the French Code Civil, and dismissed the appeal as the suit was barred by limitation.
BHARTI AXA GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SAHIDAN & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that counsel’s fee cannot be awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, partially allowing the insurer’s appeal by setting aside the counsel’s fee portion of the compensation.
R.P.FOAM HOME PVT. LTD. v. BEAMECH GROUP LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as infructuous after the bank made the payment under the letter of credit, rendering the dispute moot.