Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shri Kesar Dass Arora & Anr. v. Shri Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant an extension to vacate premises until 01.03.2026 on condition of paying monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying eviction execution subject to compliance.
LR of deceased v. Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying eviction execution until March 2026.
Shri Ravi Arora v. Shri Vijay Shanker
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order until March 2026.
Khursheed Alam v. Mithlesh
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and filing an undertaking, staying eviction until 31.01.2026.
Dr. Pawan Kumar Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that interest on delayed retiral benefits must be calculated from the date of retirement, not from the Tribunal's order, and directed payment at 7.5% per annum with escalation to 12% for prolonged delay.
Meenu Saluja v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi) & Amandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim bail granted to an accused in a murder case on compassionate grounds related to his child's Board Examination, emphasizing the balance between accused's rights and public interest.
Mohd Shoeb Ali v. The Banking Ombudsman & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Banking Ombudsman to decide the petitioner's cyber fraud complaint within eight weeks, treating the writ petition as a representation, without adjudicating on the merits.
Abhishek Gupta v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court set aside a bank's fraud classification order for non-supply of the forensic audit report to the account holder, directing fresh consideration after affording an opportunity to respond.
Nakul Manuja v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning an erroneous deposit by treating it as a representation and directed the respondent authority to decide the matter expeditiously with procedural fairness.
Kundan Kumar @ Gore v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, holding that no mandatory Section 41A CrPC notice was issued before arrest and that disclosure statements of co-accused without corroboration are insufficient to deny bail during ongoing investigation.
Rattan India Power Ltd v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim arbitral award based on admissions in minutes of meetings and issuance of C-forms, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Rajesh Breja v. The State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a criminal conspiracy case, holding that mere apprehensions without concrete evidence cannot justify denial of bail once investigation is complete and charge sheet filed.
C Sharma v. Navdeep Singh & Ors.
The High Court upheld the dismissal of a criminal complaint and revision petition due to inherently improbable allegations and lack of sufficient grounds to summon the accused.
Sanjay Sushil Bhosale v. Yogesh Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's refusal to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that summons were duly served and no sufficient cause was shown for non-appearance.
Psychotropic India Limited v. Meridian Medicare Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled respondent's trademark 'TROMA' for pharmaceutical goods, holding it deceptively similar and dishonestly adopted, affirming petitioner's prior rights.
Under Armour Inc. v. Ashwani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar 'AU' trademark registration in favour of Under Armour Inc., affirming the petitioner's prior rights and ordering rectification of the trademark register.
Joyi Kitty Joseph v. Union of India
The Supreme Court set aside a preventive detention order under COFEPOSA for failure to consider bail conditions imposed for the same smuggling allegations, emphasizing the need for subjective satisfaction on their sufficiency before detention.
Sita Ram & Anr v. State of Himachal Pradesh
The Supreme Court upheld convictions for culpable homicide based on a dying declaration in the FIR despite death by asphyxia, clarifying that expectation of death is not required for admissibility under Section 32 of the Evidence Act.
Rabindranath Panigrahi v. Surendra Sahu
The Supreme Court restored the lower courts' findings that the defendant was a tenant without title by adverse possession, allowing the landlord's eviction appeal and clarifying the scope of substantial questions of law under Section 100 CPC.
M/s Shri Sendhur Agro & Oil Industries v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act can be transferred under Section 406 CrPC for ends of justice, even if the court has jurisdiction, and ordered transfer of the complaint from Chandigarh to Coimbatore where the transaction occurred.