Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Yamini Mittal v. Delhi High Court through its Registrar General
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a rule limiting candidates admitted to the DHJS Main Examination to twenty times the vacancies, dismissed challenges to reservation seat diversion and additional vacancies, and refused to interfere in the recruitment process.
N v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the discharge of the accused from the rape charge under Section 376 IPC, holding that discrepancies between FIR and Section 164 CrPC statements cannot justify discharge at the charge framing stage and remanded the case for trial.
Vikram Phogat v. Suman
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging interim maintenance awarded under the DV Act, holding that in absence of credible income proof, courts may infer financial capacity and uphold maintenance orders.
Swagath Restaurants v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that additional license fee for increased seating capacity is payable only in the transition year and set aside the demand for further payments in subsequent years under the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010.
Radico Khaitan Limited v. Harish Chouhan
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitration clause contained in invoices constitutes a valid arbitration agreement if parties intend to be governed by it, and referred the dispute to arbitration appointing a sole arbitrator.
X v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging acquittal in a POCSO and IPC sexual offence case, holding that the victim's testimony did not inspire confidence and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Indira Bahuguna and Ors. v. Lt Governor of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition under the 2013 Act does not lapse unless both possession is not taken and compensation is not paid, dismissing the petition claiming lapse of acquisition on non-payment of compensation alone.
Tacon Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. National Highways Authority of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of an unconditional bank guarantee cannot be restrained except in cases of egregious fraud or special equity causing irretrievable injustice, dismissing the petition seeking such restraint.
PIONEER CORPORATION v. MR. GAURAV KUMAR & ORS.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Pioneer Corporation against defendants selling counterfeit goods under its registered PIONEER trademark, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to contest.
Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Ashok Kumar Kaushik & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that only the Court, not the Registrar, can close the right to file replication under the High Court Rules, and set aside the Registrar's orders closing replication rights as jurisdictionally erroneous.
Kumari Gayatri Tripathi v. Trust Mandir Shri Ramchanderji
The Delhi High Court held that title disputes cannot be adjudicated in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, and upheld the eviction order dismissing the tenant's claim of ownership and plea of res judicata.
Eureka Forbes Limited v. Om Sai Enterprises and Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit for permanent injunction, damages, and costs against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off due to non-contestation and use of counterfeit products.
EUREKA FORBES LIMITED v. MR. VINOD K. AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against a defendant for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendant's non-appearance.
Sanja Gupta v. Prachin Gaur
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises subject to payment of monthly user charges and compliance with an undertaking, staying the eviction order till 31.12.2025.
RV Solutions Pvt Ltd v. Randhir Kumar
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a contractual payment dispute after finding valid service and existence of an arbitration agreement.
Vadim Infrastructure Private Limited v. Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator to adjudicate contractual disputes between Vadim Infrastructure and BHEL, emphasizing the court's power to intervene when the designated authority is unable or unwilling to appoint an arbitrator.
Vasudev v. Roop Kumari Thr LRs & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s decree granting possession and damages to the Plaintiff, holding that the Defendant failed to prove title or continuous possession through unregistered documents and that the probate order conclusively established the Plaintiff’s ownership.
Chasvinder Singh v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The High Court set aside the order summoning the petitioner under Section 319 Cr.P.C. due to lack of strong evidence and held that such power must be exercised sparingly and not on afterthought allegations.
V K Mishra v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal’s refusal to adjudicate a pay scale upgradation claim, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in line with Supreme Court directions.
Pramod Kumar Kaushik v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the legality of the promotion process for Deputy Commandant (Accounts Officer) in ITBPF, clarifying seniority rules under different Recruitment Rules and dismissing the petition challenging the promotion memorandum.