Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sachin Hindurao Waze v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld the legality of the petitioner's arrest and detention by the NIA, ruling that remand and cognizance procedures under the NIA Act and Cr.P.C. were properly followed and no consent under Section 45 Cr.P.C. was required as the petitioner was not acting in official capacity during the alleged offences.
Suresh Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that for ACP and MACP benefits, service must be reckoned from initial appointment ignoring re-mustering promotions where posts were merged, directing grant of benefits and arrears to petitioners.
Sumit Kumar Ghosh v. Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that for ACP and MACP benefits, service must be reckoned from initial appointment ignoring intermediate promotions merged in hierarchy, directing grant of benefits and arrears to the petitioner.
CPL Chandra Prakash Chhipa (Retd) v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging retrospective pension policy implementation, holding that the Armed Forces Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction over such service matters.
Rahul Singh v. Border Security Force & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a BSF officer is not entitled to training allowance after being relieved from Instructor duties post-promotion, but excess payments made without fault cannot be recovered without due process.
Mst. Zarina Begum v. Mst. Naseema Begum & Ors.
The High Court upheld the eviction order dismissing tenant's leave to defend, holding that title disputes are not adjudicable in eviction proceedings and the tenant is estopped from denying landlord's title under Section 116 of the Evidence Act.
State v. Subhash Chandra Luthra
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against the acquittal of the accused in a sexual harassment case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and the trial court's acquittal was justified.
Mst. Kanta Goswami v. Roshan Arora
The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s order directing occupation charges during suit pendency but reduced the amount from ₹30,000 to ₹10,000 per month, emphasizing prima facie ownership and tenancy at interlocutory stage.
Union of India v. Sh Chander Mohan Chopra & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's appeal and upheld the Supreme Court's enhanced compensation rates for land acquired in Village Pochanpur, applying the precedent set in the Impulse India case.
M/S GTL Infrastructure Ltd. v. S.C Wadhwa and Sons (HUF)
The Delhi High Court upheld an order under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act directing removal of a cellular tower and deposit of outstanding license fees, affirming courts' wide powers to grant interim mandatory reliefs to protect arbitration subject matter.
State v. Kaptan Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal, holding that prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 279 and 338 IPC.
Sh. Gulab Singh and Ors. v. D.M. /LAC South West District Kapashera & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings by holding that government-granted extensions of statutory timelines under the Land Acquisition Act prevent lapse or rescission of acquisition notifications and awards.
The Bhajanpura Co Op Urban T/C Society Ltd. v. Mukesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Lok Adalat settlement novates the original agreement, restricting enforcement to the settlement terms and setting aside an ex parte arbitral award passed without disclosure of such settlement.
Gopal Mishra & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that accused persons are entitled to a cloned copy of electronic evidence relied upon by the prosecution to ensure effective cross-examination and a fair trial.
Shri Srikant Prasad and Others v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Tribunal order by non-parties, directing them to seek remedy before the Tribunal via review or fresh application as per established legal principles.
Tyrance T Benjamin v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for contempt against transport authorities, holding that respondents who took all reasonable steps to comply with Court directions cannot be held guilty of contempt for backend data errors beyond their control.
Ashok Kumar v. Krishan Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the trial court's refusal to recall the plaintiff for cross-examination and rejection of current property valuation documents, affirming that recall under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC requires justifiable grounds and pecuniary jurisdiction is based on valuation at suit filing.
VST Industries Limited v. ASD Tobacco Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent’s trademark "CHUMS" for being deceptively similar to the petitioner’s prior registered mark "CHARMS" under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Aveena Mailk Products v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh hearing and reasoned reconsideration of the petitioner's delayed grant application, emphasizing natural justice and speaking orders before final denial.
Koyala Mazdoor Panchayat v. Ministry of Coal
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Coal to hear and decide the petitioner's representation pending since 2019 within a stipulated timeframe, ensuring expeditious administrative action.